2004-08-07 04:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Copyright (C) 2001 Matthew Dillon. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
.\" are met:
|
|
|
|
.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.Dd May 26, 2001
|
|
|
|
.Dt FIREWALL 7
|
2001-07-10 15:31:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Os
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh NAME
|
|
|
|
.Nm firewall
|
|
|
|
.Nd simple firewalls under FreeBSD
|
|
|
|
.Sh FIREWALL BASICS
|
|
|
|
A Firewall is most commonly used to protect an internal network
|
|
|
|
from an outside network by preventing the outside network from
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
making arbitrary connections into the internal network.
|
|
|
|
Firewalls
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
are also used to prevent outside entities from spoofing internal
|
|
|
|
IP addresses and to isolate services such as NFS or SMBFS (Windows
|
|
|
|
file sharing) within LAN segments.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Fx
|
|
|
|
firewalling system also has the capability to limit bandwidth using
|
|
|
|
.Xr dummynet 4 .
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
This feature can be useful when you need to guarantee a certain
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
amount of bandwidth for a critical purpose.
|
|
|
|
For example, if you
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
are doing video conferencing over the Internet via your
|
2003-04-26 09:30:34 +00:00
|
|
|
office T1 (1.5 MBits/s), you may wish to bandwidth-limit all other
|
|
|
|
T1 traffic to 1 MBit/s in order to reserve at least 0.5 MBits
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
for your video conferencing connections.
|
|
|
|
Similarly if you are
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
running a popular web or ftp site from a colocation facility
|
2003-04-26 09:30:34 +00:00
|
|
|
you might want to limit bandwidth to prevent excessive bandwidth
|
|
|
|
charges from your provider.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Finally,
|
|
|
|
.Fx
|
|
|
|
firewalls may be used to divert packets or change the next-hop
|
|
|
|
address for packets to help route them to the correct destination.
|
|
|
|
Packet diversion is most often used to support NAT (network
|
|
|
|
address translation), which allows an internal network using
|
|
|
|
a private IP space to make connections to the outside for browsing
|
|
|
|
or other purposes.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Constructing a firewall may appear to be trivial, but most people
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
get them wrong.
|
|
|
|
The most common mistake is to create an exclusive
|
|
|
|
firewall rather than an inclusive firewall.
|
|
|
|
An exclusive firewall
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
allows all packets through except for those matching a set of rules.
|
2002-10-22 22:34:29 +00:00
|
|
|
An inclusive firewall allows only packets matching the ruleset
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
through.
|
|
|
|
Inclusive firewalls are much, much safer than exclusive
|
|
|
|
firewalls but a tad more difficult to build properly.
|
|
|
|
The
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
second most common mistake is to blackhole everything except the
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
particular port you want to let through.
|
|
|
|
TCP/IP needs to be able
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
to get certain types of ICMP errors to function properly - for
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
example, to implement MTU discovery.
|
|
|
|
Also, a number of common
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
system daemons make reverse connections to the
|
|
|
|
.Sy auth
|
|
|
|
service in an attempt to authenticate the user making a connection.
|
|
|
|
Auth is rather dangerous but the proper implementation is to return
|
2002-10-22 22:36:56 +00:00
|
|
|
a TCP reset for the connection attempt rather than simply blackholing
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
the packet.
|
|
|
|
We cover these and other quirks involved with constructing
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
a firewall in the sample firewall section below.
|
|
|
|
.Sh IPFW KERNEL CONFIGURATION
|
2002-07-29 07:22:26 +00:00
|
|
|
You do not need to create a custom kernel to use the IP firewalling features.
|
2002-06-25 02:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
If you enable firewalling in your
|
2002-11-29 11:39:20 +00:00
|
|
|
.Em /etc/rc.conf
|
2002-10-22 22:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
(see below), the ipfw kernel module will be loaded automatically
|
|
|
|
when necessary.
|
|
|
|
However,
|
2002-06-25 02:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if you are paranoid you can compile IPFW directly into the
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Fx
|
2002-06-25 02:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
kernel by using the
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sy IPFIREWALL
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
option set.
|
|
|
|
If compiled in the kernel, ipfw denies all
|
2002-10-22 22:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
packets by default, which means that, if you do not load in
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
a permissive ruleset via
|
|
|
|
.Em /etc/rc.conf ,
|
2002-10-22 22:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rebooting into your new kernel will take the network offline.
|
|
|
|
This can prevent you from being able to access your system if you
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
are not sitting at the console.
|
|
|
|
It is also quite common to
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
update a kernel to a new release and reboot before updating
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
the binaries.
|
|
|
|
This can result in an incompatibility between
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
the
|
|
|
|
.Xr ipfw 8
|
|
|
|
program and the kernel which prevents it from running in the
|
|
|
|
boot sequence, also resulting in an inaccessible machine.
|
|
|
|
Because of these problems the
|
|
|
|
.Sy IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
|
|
|
|
kernel option is also available which changes the default firewall
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
to pass through all packets.
|
|
|
|
Note, however, that using this option
|
2002-06-25 02:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
may open a small window of opportunity during booting where your
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
firewall passes all packets.
|
|
|
|
Still, it's a good option to use
|
2002-06-25 02:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
while getting up to speed with
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Fx
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
firewalling.
|
|
|
|
Get rid of it once you understand how it all works
|
|
|
|
to close the loophole, though.
|
|
|
|
There is a third option called
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sy IPDIVERT
|
|
|
|
which allows you to use the firewall to divert packets to a user program
|
|
|
|
and is necessary if you wish to use
|
|
|
|
.Xr natd 8
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
to give private internal networks access to the outside world.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
If you want to be able to limit the bandwidth used by certain types of
|
|
|
|
traffic, the
|
|
|
|
.Sy DUMMYNET
|
|
|
|
option must be used to enable
|
|
|
|
.Em ipfw pipe
|
|
|
|
rules.
|
|
|
|
.Sh SAMPLE IPFW-BASED FIREWALL
|
|
|
|
Here is an example ipfw-based firewall taken from a machine with three
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
interface cards.
|
|
|
|
fxp0 is connected to the 'exposed' LAN.
|
|
|
|
Machines
|
|
|
|
on this LAN are dual-homed with both internal 10.\& IP addresses and
|
|
|
|
Internet-routed IP addresses.
|
|
|
|
In our example, 192.100.5.x represents
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
the Internet-routed IP block while 10.x.x.x represents the internal
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
networks.
|
|
|
|
While it isn't relevant to the example, 10.0.1.x is
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
assigned as the internal address block for the LAN on fxp0, 10.0.2.x
|
|
|
|
for the LAN on fxp1, and 10.0.3.x for the LAN on fxp2.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
In this example we want to isolate all three LANs from the Internet
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
as well as isolate them from each other, and we want to give all
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
internal addresses access to the Internet through a NAT gateway running
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
on this machine.
|
|
|
|
To make the NAT gateway work, the firewall machine
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
is given two Internet-exposed addresses on fxp0 in addition to an
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
internal 10.\& address on fxp0: one exposed address (not shown)
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
represents the machine's official address, and the second exposed
|
|
|
|
address (192.100.5.5 in our example) represents the NAT gateway
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rendezvous IP.
|
|
|
|
We make the example more complex by giving the machines
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
on the exposed LAN internal 10.0.0.x addresses as well as exposed
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
addresses.
|
|
|
|
The idea here is that you can bind internal services
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
to internal addresses even on exposed machines and still protect
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
those services from the Internet.
|
|
|
|
The only services you run on
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
exposed IP addresses would be the ones you wish to expose to the
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Internet.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
It is important to note that the 10.0.0.x network in our example
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
is not protected by our firewall.
|
|
|
|
You must make sure that your
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Internet router protects this network from outside spoofing.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
Also, in our example, we pretty much give the exposed hosts free
|
|
|
|
reign on our internal network when operating services through
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
internal IP addresses (10.0.0.x).
|
|
|
|
This is somewhat of security
|
|
|
|
risk: what if an exposed host is compromised?
|
|
|
|
To remove the
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
risk and force everything coming in via LAN0 to go through
|
|
|
|
the firewall, remove rules 01010 and 01011.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Finally, note that the use of internal addresses represents a
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
big piece of our firewall protection mechanism.
|
|
|
|
With proper
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
spoofing safeguards in place, nothing outside can directly
|
|
|
|
access an internal (LAN1 or LAN2) host.
|
|
|
|
.Bd -literal
|
|
|
|
# /etc/rc.conf
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
firewall_enable="YES"
|
|
|
|
firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.conf"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# temporary port binding range let
|
|
|
|
# through the firewall.
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# NOTE: heavily loaded services running through the firewall may require
|
|
|
|
# a larger port range for local-size binding. 4000-10000 or 4000-30000
|
|
|
|
# might be a better choice.
|
|
|
|
ip_portrange_first=4000
|
|
|
|
ip_portrange_last=5000
|
2001-07-10 18:43:07 +00:00
|
|
|
\&...
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Ed
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
.Bd -literal
|
|
|
|
# /etc/ipfw.conf
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# FIREWALL: the firewall machine / nat gateway
|
|
|
|
# LAN0 10.0.0.X and 192.100.5.X (dual homed)
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
# LAN1 10.0.1.X
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# LAN2 10.0.2.X
|
|
|
|
# sw: ethernet switch (unmanaged)
|
|
|
|
#
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
# 192.100.5.x represents IP addresses exposed to the Internet
|
|
|
|
# (i.e. Internet routeable). 10.x.x.x represent internal IPs
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# (not exposed)
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# [LAN1]
|
|
|
|
# ^
|
|
|
|
# |
|
|
|
|
# FIREWALL -->[LAN2]
|
|
|
|
# |
|
|
|
|
# [LAN0]
|
|
|
|
# |
|
|
|
|
# +--> exposed host A
|
|
|
|
# +--> exposed host B
|
|
|
|
# +--> exposed host C
|
|
|
|
# |
|
|
|
|
# INTERNET (secondary firewall)
|
|
|
|
# ROUTER
|
|
|
|
# |
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
# [Internet]
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# NOT SHOWN: The INTERNET ROUTER must contain rules to disallow
|
|
|
|
# all packets with source IP addresses in the 10. block in order
|
|
|
|
# to protect the dual-homed 10.0.0.x block. Exposed hosts are
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
# not otherwise protected in this example - they should only bind
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# exposed services to exposed IPs but can safely bind internal
|
|
|
|
# services to internal IPs.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# The NAT gateway works by taking packets sent from internal
|
|
|
|
# IP addresses to external IP addresses and routing them to natd, which
|
|
|
|
# is listening on port 8668. This is handled by rule 00300. Data coming
|
|
|
|
# back to natd from the outside world must also be routed to natd using
|
|
|
|
# rule 00301. To make the example interesting, we note that we do
|
|
|
|
# NOT have to run internal requests to exposed hosts through natd
|
|
|
|
# (rule 00290) because those exposed hosts know about our
|
|
|
|
# 10. network. This can reduce the load on natd. Also note that we
|
|
|
|
# of course do not have to route internal<->internal traffic through
|
|
|
|
# natd since those hosts know how to route our 10. internal network.
|
|
|
|
# The natd command we run from /etc/rc.local is shown below. See
|
|
|
|
# also the in-kernel version of natd, ipnat.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# natd -s -u -a 208.161.114.67
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 00290 skipto 1000 ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to 192.100.5.0/24
|
|
|
|
add 00300 divert 8668 ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to not 10.0.0.0/8
|
|
|
|
add 00301 divert 8668 ip from not 10.0.0.0/8 to 192.100.5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Short cut the rules to avoid running high bandwidths through
|
|
|
|
# the entire rule set. Allow established tcp connections through,
|
|
|
|
# and shortcut all outgoing packets under the assumption that
|
|
|
|
# we need only firewall incoming packets.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Allowing established tcp connections through creates a small
|
|
|
|
# hole but may be necessary to avoid overloading your firewall.
|
|
|
|
# If you are worried, you can move the rule to after the spoof
|
|
|
|
# checks.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 01000 allow tcp from any to any established
|
|
|
|
add 01001 allow all from any to any out via fxp0
|
|
|
|
add 01001 allow all from any to any out via fxp1
|
|
|
|
add 01001 allow all from any to any out via fxp2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Spoof protection. This depends on how well you trust your
|
|
|
|
# internal networks. Packets received via fxp1 MUST come from
|
|
|
|
# 10.0.1.x. Packets received via fxp2 MUST come from 10.0.2.x.
|
|
|
|
# Packets received via fxp0 cannot come from the LAN1 or LAN2
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
# blocks. We can't protect 10.0.0.x here, the Internet router
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# must do that for us.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 01500 deny all from not 10.0.1.0/24 in via fxp1
|
|
|
|
add 01500 deny all from not 10.0.2.0/24 in via fxp2
|
|
|
|
add 01501 deny all from 10.0.1.0/24 in via fxp0
|
|
|
|
add 01501 deny all from 10.0.2.0/24 in via fxp0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# In this example rule set there are no restrictions between
|
|
|
|
# internal hosts, even those on the exposed LAN (as long as
|
|
|
|
# they use an internal IP address). This represents a
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
# potential security hole (what if an exposed host is
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# compromised?). If you want full restrictions to apply
|
|
|
|
# between the three LANs, firewalling them off from each
|
|
|
|
# other for added security, remove these two rules.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# If you want to isolate LAN1 and LAN2, but still want
|
|
|
|
# to give exposed hosts free reign with each other, get
|
|
|
|
# rid of rule 01010 and keep rule 01011.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# (commented out, uncomment for less restrictive firewall)
|
|
|
|
#add 01010 allow all from 10.0.0.0/8 to 10.0.0.0/8
|
|
|
|
#add 01011 allow all from 192.100.5.0/24 to 192.100.5.0/24
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# SPECIFIC SERVICES ALLOWED FROM SPECIFIC LANS
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# If using a more restrictive firewall, allow specific LANs
|
|
|
|
# access to specific services running on the firewall itself.
|
|
|
|
# In this case we assume LAN1 needs access to filesharing running
|
|
|
|
# on the firewall. If using a less restrictive firewall
|
|
|
|
# (allowing rule 01010), you don't need these rules.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 01012 allow tcp from 10.0.1.0/8 to 10.0.1.1 139
|
|
|
|
add 01012 allow udp from 10.0.1.0/8 to 10.0.1.1 137,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# GENERAL SERVICES ALLOWED TO CROSS INTERNAL AND EXPOSED LANS
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# We allow specific UDP services through: DNS lookups, ntalk, and ntp.
|
|
|
|
# Note that internal services are protected by virtue of having
|
|
|
|
# spoof-proof internal IP addresses (10. net), so these rules
|
|
|
|
# really only apply to services bound to exposed IPs. We have
|
|
|
|
# to allow UDP fragments or larger fragmented UDP packets will
|
|
|
|
# not survive the firewall.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# If we want to expose high-numbered temporary service ports
|
|
|
|
# for things like DNS lookup responses we can use a port range,
|
|
|
|
# in this example 4000-65535, and we set to /etc/rc.conf variables
|
|
|
|
# on all exposed machines to make sure they bind temporary ports
|
|
|
|
# to the exposed port range (see rc.conf example above)
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 02000 allow udp from any to any 4000-65535,domain,ntalk,ntp
|
|
|
|
add 02500 allow udp from any to any frag
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Allow similar services for TCP. Again, these only apply to
|
|
|
|
# services bound to exposed addresses. NOTE: we allow 'auth'
|
|
|
|
# through but do not actually run an identd server on any exposed
|
|
|
|
# port. This allows the machine being authed to respond with a
|
|
|
|
# TCP RESET. Throwing the packet away would result in delays
|
|
|
|
# when connecting to remote services that do reverse ident lookups.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Note that we do not allow tcp fragments through, and that we do
|
|
|
|
# not allow fragments in general (except for UDP fragments). We
|
|
|
|
# expect the TCP mtu discovery protocol to work properly so there
|
|
|
|
# should be no TCP fragments.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 03000 allow tcp from any to any http,https
|
|
|
|
add 03000 allow tcp from any to any 4000-65535,ssh,smtp,domain,ntalk
|
|
|
|
add 03000 allow tcp from any to any auth,pop3,ftp,ftp-data
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-25 04:13:46 +00:00
|
|
|
# It is important to allow certain ICMP types through, here is a list
|
|
|
|
# of general ICMP types. Note that it is important to let ICMP type 3
|
|
|
|
# through.
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# 0 Echo Reply
|
2002-06-25 04:13:46 +00:00
|
|
|
# 3 Destination Unreachable (used by TCP MTU discovery, aka
|
|
|
|
# packet-too-big)
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# 4 Source Quench (typically not allowed)
|
|
|
|
# 5 Redirect (typically not allowed - can be dangerous!)
|
|
|
|
# 8 Echo
|
|
|
|
# 11 Time Exceeded
|
|
|
|
# 12 Parameter Problem
|
|
|
|
# 13 Timestamp
|
|
|
|
# 14 Timestamp Reply
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Sometimes people need to allow ICMP REDIRECT packets, which is
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
# type 5, but if you allow it make sure that your Internet router
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# disallows it.
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-25 04:13:46 +00:00
|
|
|
add 04000 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0,3,8,11,12,13,14
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# log any remaining fragments that get through. Might be useful,
|
|
|
|
# otherwise don't bother. Have a final deny rule as a safety to
|
2002-01-09 12:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
# guarantee that your firewall is inclusive no matter how the kernel
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
# is configured.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
add 05000 deny log ip from any to any frag
|
|
|
|
add 06000 deny all from any to any
|
|
|
|
.Ed
|
|
|
|
.Sh PORT BINDING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL SERVICES
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
We've mentioned multi-homing hosts and binding services to internal or
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
external addresses but we haven't really explained it.
|
|
|
|
When you have a
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
host with multiple IP addresses assigned to it, you can bind services run
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
on that host to specific IPs or interfaces rather than all IPs.
|
|
|
|
Take
|
|
|
|
the firewall machine for example: with three interfaces
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
and two exposed IP addresses
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
on one of those interfaces, the firewall machine is known by 5 different
|
|
|
|
IP addresses (10.0.0.1, 10.0.1.1, 10.0.2.1, 192.100.5.5, and say
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
192.100.5.1).
|
|
|
|
If the firewall is providing file sharing services to the
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
windows LAN segment (say it is LAN1), you can use samba's 'bind interfaces'
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
directive to specifically bind it to just the LAN1 IP address.
|
|
|
|
That
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
way the file sharing services will not be made available to other LAN
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
segments.
|
|
|
|
The same goes for NFS.
|
|
|
|
If LAN2 has your UNIX engineering
|
|
|
|
workstations, you can tell nfsd to bind specifically to 10.0.2.1.
|
|
|
|
You
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
can specify how to bind virtually every service on the machine and you
|
|
|
|
can use a light
|
|
|
|
.Xr jail 8
|
|
|
|
to indirectly bind services that do not otherwise give you the option.
|
|
|
|
.Sh SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
.Xr ipnat 1 ,
|
2001-07-06 16:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr dummynet 4 ,
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr ipnat 5 ,
|
2001-07-06 16:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr rc.conf 5 ,
|
2004-06-16 08:33:57 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr smb.conf 5 Pq Pa ports/net/samba ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr samba 7 Pq Pa ports/net/samba ,
|
2001-07-06 16:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr config 8 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr ipfw 8 ,
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr jail 8 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr natd 8 ,
|
2001-07-06 16:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr nfsd 8
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh ADDITIONAL READING
|
2004-10-23 15:05:46 +00:00
|
|
|
.Bl -tag -width xxxx
|
|
|
|
.It Nm Ipfilter
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr ipf 5 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr ipf 8 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr ipfstat 8
|
2004-10-23 15:05:46 +00:00
|
|
|
.It Nm Packet Filter
|
|
|
|
.Xr pf.conf 5 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr pfctl 8 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr pflogd 8
|
|
|
|
.El
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh HISTORY
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Nm
|
|
|
|
manual page was originally written by
|
|
|
|
.An Matthew Dillon
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
and first appeared
|
2001-05-27 23:14:27 +00:00
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
|
.Fx 4.3 ,
|
|
|
|
May 2001.
|