freebsd-dev/sbin/fsck_ffs/inode.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1476 lines
37 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*
* Copyright (c) 1980, 1986, 1993
* The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
* may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
* without specific prior written permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#if 0
#ifndef lint
static const char sccsid[] = "@(#)inode.c 8.8 (Berkeley) 4/28/95";
#endif /* not lint */
#endif
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
#include <sys/stat.h>
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
#include <sys/stdint.h>
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
#include <ufs/ufs/dinode.h>
#include <ufs/ufs/dir.h>
#include <ufs/ffs/fs.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <pwd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <libufs.h>
#include "fsck.h"
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct bufarea *icachebp; /* inode cache buffer */
static int iblock(struct inodesc *, off_t isize, int type);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
static ufs2_daddr_t indir_blkatoff(ufs2_daddr_t, ino_t, ufs_lbn_t, ufs_lbn_t,
struct bufarea **);
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
static int snapclean(struct inodesc *idesc);
static void chkcopyonwrite(struct fs *, ufs2_daddr_t,
ufs2_daddr_t (*checkblkavail)(ufs2_daddr_t, long));
int
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
ckinode(union dinode *dp, struct inodesc *idesc)
{
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
off_t remsize, sizepb;
int i, offset, ret;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode dino;
ufs2_daddr_t ndb;
mode_t mode;
char pathbuf[MAXPATHLEN + 1];
if (idesc->id_fix != IGNORE)
idesc->id_fix = DONTKNOW;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
idesc->id_dp = dp;
idesc->id_lbn = -1;
idesc->id_lballoc = -1;
idesc->id_level = 0;
idesc->id_entryno = 0;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
idesc->id_filesize = DIP(dp, di_size);
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
mode = DIP(dp, di_mode) & IFMT;
if (mode == IFBLK || mode == IFCHR || (mode == IFLNK &&
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
DIP(dp, di_size) < (unsigned)sblock.fs_maxsymlinklen))
return (KEEPON);
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC)
dino.dp1 = dp->dp1;
else
dino.dp2 = dp->dp2;
if (DIP(&dino, di_size) < 0) {
pfatal("NEGATIVE INODE SIZE %jd\n", DIP(&dino, di_size));
return (STOP);
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
ndb = howmany(DIP(&dino, di_size), sblock.fs_bsize);
for (i = 0; i < UFS_NDADDR; i++) {
idesc->id_lbn++;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (--ndb == 0 &&
(offset = blkoff(&sblock, DIP(&dino, di_size))) != 0)
idesc->id_numfrags =
numfrags(&sblock, fragroundup(&sblock, offset));
else
idesc->id_numfrags = sblock.fs_frag;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (DIP(&dino, di_db[i]) == 0) {
if (idesc->id_type == DATA && ndb >= 0) {
/* An empty block in a directory XXX */
getpathname(pathbuf, idesc->id_number,
idesc->id_number);
pfatal("DIRECTORY %s: CONTAINS EMPTY BLOCKS",
pathbuf);
if (reply("ADJUST LENGTH") == 1) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(idesc->id_number, &ip);
DIP_SET(ip.i_dp, di_size,
i * sblock.fs_bsize);
printf(
"YOU MUST RERUN FSCK AFTERWARDS\n");
rerun = 1;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
irelse(&ip);
}
return (STOP);
}
continue;
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
idesc->id_blkno = DIP(&dino, di_db[i]);
if (idesc->id_type != DATA)
ret = (*idesc->id_func)(idesc);
else
ret = dirscan(idesc);
if (ret & STOP)
return (ret);
}
idesc->id_numfrags = sblock.fs_frag;
remsize = DIP(&dino, di_size) - sblock.fs_bsize * UFS_NDADDR;
sizepb = sblock.fs_bsize;
for (i = 0; i < UFS_NIADDR; i++) {
sizepb *= NINDIR(&sblock);
idesc->id_level = i + 1;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (DIP(&dino, di_ib[i])) {
idesc->id_blkno = DIP(&dino, di_ib[i]);
ret = iblock(idesc, remsize, BT_LEVEL1 + i);
if (ret & STOP)
return (ret);
} else if (remsize > 0) {
idesc->id_lbn += sizepb / sblock.fs_bsize;
if (idesc->id_type == DATA) {
/* An empty block in a directory XXX */
getpathname(pathbuf, idesc->id_number,
idesc->id_number);
pfatal("DIRECTORY %s: CONTAINS EMPTY BLOCKS",
pathbuf);
if (reply("ADJUST LENGTH") == 1) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(idesc->id_number, &ip);
DIP_SET(ip.i_dp, di_size,
DIP(ip.i_dp, di_size) - remsize);
remsize = 0;
printf(
"YOU MUST RERUN FSCK AFTERWARDS\n");
rerun = 1;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
irelse(&ip);
break;
}
}
}
remsize -= sizepb;
}
return (KEEPON);
}
static int
iblock(struct inodesc *idesc, off_t isize, int type)
{
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
struct bufarea *bp;
int i, n, (*func)(struct inodesc *), nif;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
off_t sizepb;
char buf[BUFSIZ];
char pathbuf[MAXPATHLEN + 1];
if (idesc->id_type != DATA) {
func = idesc->id_func;
if (((n = (*func)(idesc)) & KEEPON) == 0)
return (n);
} else
func = dirscan;
bp = getdatablk(idesc->id_blkno, sblock.fs_bsize, type);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (bp->b_errs != 0) {
brelse(bp);
return (SKIP);
}
idesc->id_bp = bp;
idesc->id_level--;
for (sizepb = sblock.fs_bsize, i = 0; i < idesc->id_level; i++)
sizepb *= NINDIR(&sblock);
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (howmany(isize, sizepb) > NINDIR(&sblock))
nif = NINDIR(&sblock);
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
else
nif = howmany(isize, sizepb);
if (idesc->id_func == pass1check && nif < NINDIR(&sblock)) {
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
for (i = nif; i < NINDIR(&sblock); i++) {
if (IBLK(bp, i) == 0)
continue;
(void)sprintf(buf, "PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=%lu",
1998-06-28 19:23:03 +00:00
(u_long)idesc->id_number);
if (preen) {
pfatal("%s", buf);
} else if (dofix(idesc, buf)) {
IBLK_SET(bp, i, 0);
dirty(bp);
}
}
flush(fswritefd, bp);
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < nif; i++) {
if (IBLK(bp, i)) {
idesc->id_blkno = IBLK(bp, i);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
bp->b_index = i;
if (idesc->id_level == 0) {
idesc->id_lbn++;
n = (*func)(idesc);
} else {
n = iblock(idesc, isize, type - 1);
idesc->id_level++;
}
if (n & STOP) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
brelse(bp);
return (n);
}
} else {
idesc->id_lbn += sizepb / sblock.fs_bsize;
if (idesc->id_type == DATA && isize > 0) {
/* An empty block in a directory XXX */
getpathname(pathbuf, idesc->id_number,
idesc->id_number);
pfatal("DIRECTORY %s: CONTAINS EMPTY BLOCKS",
pathbuf);
if (reply("ADJUST LENGTH") == 1) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(idesc->id_number, &ip);
DIP_SET(ip.i_dp, di_size,
DIP(ip.i_dp, di_size) - isize);
isize = 0;
printf(
"YOU MUST RERUN FSCK AFTERWARDS\n");
rerun = 1;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
brelse(bp);
return(STOP);
}
}
}
isize -= sizepb;
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
brelse(bp);
return (KEEPON);
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
/*
* Finds the disk block address at the specified lbn within the inode
* specified by dp. This follows the whole tree and honors di_size and
* di_extsize so it is a true test of reachability. The lbn may be
* negative if an extattr or indirect block is requested.
*/
ufs2_daddr_t
ino_blkatoff(union dinode *dp, ino_t ino, ufs_lbn_t lbn, int *frags,
struct bufarea **bpp)
{
ufs_lbn_t tmpval;
ufs_lbn_t cur;
ufs_lbn_t next;
int i;
*frags = 0;
if (bpp != NULL)
*bpp = NULL;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
/*
* Handle extattr blocks first.
*/
if (lbn < 0 && lbn >= -UFS_NXADDR) {
lbn = -1 - lbn;
if (lbn > lblkno(&sblock, dp->dp2.di_extsize - 1))
return (0);
*frags = numfrags(&sblock,
sblksize(&sblock, dp->dp2.di_extsize, lbn));
return (dp->dp2.di_extb[lbn]);
}
/*
* Now direct and indirect.
*/
if (DIP(dp, di_mode) == IFLNK &&
DIP(dp, di_size) < sblock.fs_maxsymlinklen)
return (0);
if (lbn >= 0 && lbn < UFS_NDADDR) {
*frags = numfrags(&sblock,
sblksize(&sblock, DIP(dp, di_size), lbn));
return (DIP(dp, di_db[lbn]));
}
*frags = sblock.fs_frag;
for (i = 0, tmpval = NINDIR(&sblock), cur = UFS_NDADDR; i < UFS_NIADDR;
i++, tmpval *= NINDIR(&sblock), cur = next) {
next = cur + tmpval;
if (lbn == -cur - i)
return (DIP(dp, di_ib[i]));
/*
* Determine whether the lbn in question is within this tree.
*/
if (lbn < 0 && -lbn >= next)
continue;
if (lbn > 0 && lbn >= next)
continue;
if (DIP(dp, di_ib[i]) == 0)
return (0);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
return (indir_blkatoff(DIP(dp, di_ib[i]), ino, -cur - i, lbn,
bpp));
}
pfatal("lbn %jd not in ino %ju\n", lbn, (uintmax_t)ino);
return (0);
}
/*
* Fetch an indirect block to find the block at a given lbn. The lbn
* may be negative to fetch a specific indirect block pointer or positive
* to fetch a specific block.
*/
static ufs2_daddr_t
indir_blkatoff(ufs2_daddr_t blk, ino_t ino, ufs_lbn_t cur, ufs_lbn_t lbn,
struct bufarea **bpp)
{
struct bufarea *bp;
ufs_lbn_t lbnadd;
ufs_lbn_t base;
int i, level;
level = lbn_level(cur);
if (level == -1)
pfatal("Invalid indir lbn %jd in ino %ju\n",
lbn, (uintmax_t)ino);
if (level == 0 && lbn < 0)
pfatal("Invalid lbn %jd in ino %ju\n",
lbn, (uintmax_t)ino);
lbnadd = 1;
base = -(cur + level);
for (i = level; i > 0; i--)
lbnadd *= NINDIR(&sblock);
if (lbn > 0)
i = (lbn - base) / lbnadd;
else
i = (-lbn - base) / lbnadd;
if (i < 0 || i >= NINDIR(&sblock)) {
pfatal("Invalid indirect index %d produced by lbn %jd "
"in ino %ju\n", i, lbn, (uintmax_t)ino);
return (0);
}
if (level == 0)
cur = base + (i * lbnadd);
else
cur = -(base + (i * lbnadd)) - (level - 1);
bp = getdatablk(blk, sblock.fs_bsize, BT_LEVEL1 + level);
if (bp->b_errs != 0)
return (0);
blk = IBLK(bp, i);
bp->b_index = i;
if (cur == lbn || blk == 0) {
if (bpp != NULL)
*bpp = bp;
else
brelse(bp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
return (blk);
}
brelse(bp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (level == 0)
pfatal("Invalid lbn %jd at level 0 for ino %ju\n", lbn,
(uintmax_t)ino);
return (indir_blkatoff(blk, ino, cur, lbn, bpp));
}
/*
* Check that a block in a legal block number.
* Return 0 if in range, 1 if out of range.
*/
int
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
chkrange(ufs2_daddr_t blk, int cnt)
{
int c;
if (cnt <= 0 || blk <= 0 || blk >= maxfsblock ||
cnt > maxfsblock - blk) {
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
if (debug)
printf("out of range: blk %ld, offset %i, size %d\n",
(long)blk, (int)fragnum(&sblock, blk), cnt);
return (1);
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
}
if (cnt > sblock.fs_frag ||
fragnum(&sblock, blk) + cnt > sblock.fs_frag) {
if (debug)
printf("bad size: blk %ld, offset %i, size %d\n",
(long)blk, (int)fragnum(&sblock, blk), cnt);
return (1);
}
c = dtog(&sblock, blk);
if (blk < cgdmin(&sblock, c)) {
if ((blk + cnt) > cgsblock(&sblock, c)) {
if (debug) {
printf("blk %ld < cgdmin %ld;",
1998-06-28 19:23:03 +00:00
(long)blk, (long)cgdmin(&sblock, c));
printf(" blk + cnt %ld > cgsbase %ld\n",
1998-06-28 19:23:03 +00:00
(long)(blk + cnt),
(long)cgsblock(&sblock, c));
}
return (1);
}
} else {
if ((blk + cnt) > cgbase(&sblock, c+1)) {
if (debug) {
printf("blk %ld >= cgdmin %ld;",
1998-06-28 19:23:03 +00:00
(long)blk, (long)cgdmin(&sblock, c));
printf(" blk + cnt %ld > sblock.fs_fpg %ld\n",
1998-06-28 19:23:03 +00:00
(long)(blk + cnt), (long)sblock.fs_fpg);
}
return (1);
}
}
return (0);
}
/*
* General purpose interface for reading inodes.
*
* firstinum and lastinum track contents of getnextino() cache (below).
*/
static ino_t firstinum, lastinum;
static struct bufarea inobuf;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
void
ginode(ino_t inumber, struct inode *ip)
{
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
ufs2_daddr_t iblk;
struct ufs2_dinode *dp;
if (inumber < UFS_ROOTINO || inumber >= maxino)
errx(EEXIT, "bad inode number %ju to ginode",
(uintmax_t)inumber);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ip->i_number = inumber;
if (inumber >= firstinum && inumber < lastinum) {
/* contents in getnextino() cache */
ip->i_bp = &inobuf;
inobuf.b_refcnt++;
inobuf.b_index = firstinum;
} else if (icachebp != NULL &&
inumber >= icachebp->b_index &&
inumber < icachebp->b_index + INOPB(&sblock)) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
/* take an additional reference for the returned inode */
icachebp->b_refcnt++;
ip->i_bp = icachebp;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
} else {
iblk = ino_to_fsba(&sblock, inumber);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
/* release our cache-hold reference on old icachebp */
if (icachebp != NULL)
brelse(icachebp);
icachebp = getdatablk(iblk, sblock.fs_bsize, BT_INODES);
if (icachebp->b_errs != 0) {
icachebp = NULL;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ip->i_bp = NULL;
ip->i_dp = &zino;
return;
}
/* take a cache-hold reference on new icachebp */
icachebp->b_refcnt++;
icachebp->b_index = rounddown(inumber, INOPB(&sblock));
ip->i_bp = icachebp;
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) {
ip->i_dp = (union dinode *)
&ip->i_bp->b_un.b_dinode1[inumber - ip->i_bp->b_index];
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
return;
}
ip->i_dp = (union dinode *)
&ip->i_bp->b_un.b_dinode2[inumber - ip->i_bp->b_index];
dp = (struct ufs2_dinode *)ip->i_dp;
/* Do not check hash of inodes being created */
if (dp->di_mode != 0 && ffs_verify_dinode_ckhash(&sblock, dp)) {
pwarn("INODE CHECK-HASH FAILED");
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
prtinode(ip);
if (preen || reply("FIX") != 0) {
if (preen)
printf(" (FIXED)\n");
ffs_update_dinode_ckhash(&sblock, dp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(ip);
}
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
}
/*
* Release a held inode.
*/
void
irelse(struct inode *ip)
{
/* Check for failed inode read */
if (ip->i_bp == NULL)
return;
if (debug && sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS2_MAGIC &&
ffs_verify_dinode_ckhash(&sblock, (struct ufs2_dinode *)ip->i_dp)) {
pwarn("irelse: releasing inode with bad check-hash");
prtinode(ip);
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (ip->i_bp->b_refcnt <= 0)
pfatal("irelse: releasing unreferenced ino %ju\n",
(uintmax_t) ip->i_number);
brelse(ip->i_bp);
}
/*
* Special purpose version of ginode used to optimize first pass
* over all the inodes in numerical order.
*/
static ino_t nextinum, lastvalidinum;
static long readcount, readpercg, fullcnt, inobufsize, partialcnt, partialsize;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode *
getnextinode(ino_t inumber, int rebuiltcg)
{
int j;
long size;
mode_t mode;
ufs2_daddr_t ndb, blk;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode *dp;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
static caddr_t nextinop;
if (inumber != nextinum++ || inumber > lastvalidinum)
errx(EEXIT, "bad inode number %ju to nextinode",
(uintmax_t)inumber);
if (inumber >= lastinum) {
readcount++;
firstinum = lastinum;
blk = ino_to_fsba(&sblock, lastinum);
if (readcount % readpercg == 0) {
size = partialsize;
lastinum += partialcnt;
} else {
size = inobufsize;
lastinum += fullcnt;
}
/*
* Flush old contents in case they have been updated.
* If getblk encounters an error, it will already have zeroed
* out the buffer, so we do not need to do so here.
*/
if (inobuf.b_refcnt != 0)
pfatal("Non-zero getnextinode() ref count %d\n",
inobuf.b_refcnt);
flush(fswritefd, &inobuf);
getblk(&inobuf, blk, size);
nextinop = inobuf.b_un.b_buf;
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
dp = (union dinode *)nextinop;
if (sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC)
nextinop += sizeof(struct ufs1_dinode);
else
nextinop += sizeof(struct ufs2_dinode);
if ((ckhashadd & CK_INODE) != 0) {
ffs_update_dinode_ckhash(&sblock, (struct ufs2_dinode *)dp);
dirty(&inobuf);
}
if (ffs_verify_dinode_ckhash(&sblock, (struct ufs2_dinode *)dp) != 0) {
pwarn("INODE CHECK-HASH FAILED");
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ip.i_bp = NULL;
ip.i_dp = dp;
ip.i_number = inumber;
prtinode(&ip);
if (preen || reply("FIX") != 0) {
if (preen)
printf(" (FIXED)\n");
ffs_update_dinode_ckhash(&sblock,
(struct ufs2_dinode *)dp);
dirty(&inobuf);
}
}
if (rebuiltcg && (char *)dp == inobuf.b_un.b_buf) {
/*
* Try to determine if we have reached the end of the
* allocated inodes.
*/
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
mode = DIP(dp, di_mode) & IFMT;
if (mode == 0) {
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (memcmp(dp->dp2.di_db, zino.dp2.di_db,
UFS_NDADDR * sizeof(ufs2_daddr_t)) ||
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
memcmp(dp->dp2.di_ib, zino.dp2.di_ib,
UFS_NIADDR * sizeof(ufs2_daddr_t)) ||
dp->dp2.di_mode || dp->dp2.di_size)
return (NULL);
return (dp);
}
if (!ftypeok(dp))
return (NULL);
ndb = howmany(DIP(dp, di_size), sblock.fs_bsize);
if (ndb < 0)
return (NULL);
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
if (mode == IFBLK || mode == IFCHR)
ndb++;
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
if (mode == IFLNK) {
/*
* Fake ndb value so direct/indirect block checks below
* will detect any garbage after symlink string.
*/
if (DIP(dp, di_size) < (off_t)sblock.fs_maxsymlinklen) {
ndb = howmany(DIP(dp, di_size),
sizeof(ufs2_daddr_t));
if (ndb > UFS_NDADDR) {
j = ndb - UFS_NDADDR;
for (ndb = 1; j > 1; j--)
ndb *= NINDIR(&sblock);
ndb += UFS_NDADDR;
}
}
}
for (j = ndb; ndb < UFS_NDADDR && j < UFS_NDADDR; j++)
if (DIP(dp, di_db[j]) != 0)
return (NULL);
for (j = 0, ndb -= UFS_NDADDR; ndb > 0; j++)
ndb /= NINDIR(&sblock);
for (; j < UFS_NIADDR; j++)
if (DIP(dp, di_ib[j]) != 0)
return (NULL);
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
return (dp);
}
void
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
setinodebuf(int cg, ino_t inosused)
{
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ino_t inum;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inum = cg * sblock.fs_ipg;
lastvalidinum = inum + inosused - 1;
nextinum = inum;
lastinum = inum;
readcount = 0;
Fix fsck_ffs -R finds unfixed duplicate block errors when rerunning. This fixes a long-standing but very obscure bug in fsck_ffs when it is run with the -R (rerun after unexpected errors). It only occurs if fsck_ffs finds duplicate blocks and they are all contained in inodes that reside in the first block of inodes (typically among the first 128 inodes). Rather than use the usual ginode() interface to walk through the inodes in pass1, there is a special optimized `getnextinode()' routine for walking through all the inodes. It has its own private buffer for reading the inode blocks. If pass 1 finds duplicate blocks it runs pass 1b to find all the inodes that contain these duplicate blocks. Pass 1b also uses the `getnextinode()' to search for the inodes with duplicate blocks. Pass 1b stops when all the duplicate blocks have been found. If all the duplicate blocks are found in the first block of inodes, then the getnextinode cache holds this block of bad inodes. The subsequent cleanup of the inodes in passes 2-5 is done using ginode() which uses the regular fsck_ffs cache. When fsck_ffs restarts, pass1() calls setinodebuf() to point at the first block of inodes. When it calls getnextinode() to get inode 2, getnextino() sees that its private cache already has the first set of inodes loaded and starts using them. They are of course the trashed inodes left over from the previous run of pass1b(). The fix is to always invalidate the getnextinode cache when calling setinodebuf(). Reported by: Chuck Silvers Tested by: Chuck Silvers MFC after: 3 days Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-03-25 00:23:33 +00:00
/* Flush old contents in case they have been updated */
flush(fswritefd, &inobuf);
inobuf.b_bno = 0;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
if (inobuf.b_un.b_buf == NULL) {
inobufsize = blkroundup(&sblock,
MAX(INOBUFSIZE, sblock.fs_bsize));
initbarea(&inobuf, BT_INODES);
if ((inobuf.b_un.b_buf = Malloc((unsigned)inobufsize)) == NULL)
errx(EEXIT, "cannot allocate space for inode buffer");
}
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
fullcnt = inobufsize / ((sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) ?
sizeof(struct ufs1_dinode) : sizeof(struct ufs2_dinode));
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
readpercg = inosused / fullcnt;
partialcnt = inosused % fullcnt;
partialsize = fragroundup(&sblock,
partialcnt * ((sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) ?
sizeof(struct ufs1_dinode) : sizeof(struct ufs2_dinode)));
if (partialcnt != 0) {
readpercg++;
} else {
partialcnt = fullcnt;
partialsize = inobufsize;
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
}
int
freeblock(struct inodesc *idesc)
{
struct dups *dlp;
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
struct bufarea *cgbp;
struct cg *cgp;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ufs2_daddr_t blkno;
long size, nfrags;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
blkno = idesc->id_blkno;
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
if (idesc->id_type == SNAP) {
pfatal("clearing a snapshot dinode\n");
return (STOP);
}
size = lfragtosize(&sblock, idesc->id_numfrags);
if (snapblkfree(&sblock, blkno, size, idesc->id_number,
std_checkblkavail))
return (KEEPON);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
for (nfrags = idesc->id_numfrags; nfrags > 0; blkno++, nfrags--) {
if (chkrange(blkno, 1)) {
return (SKIP);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
} else if (testbmap(blkno)) {
for (dlp = duplist; dlp; dlp = dlp->next) {
if (dlp->dup != blkno)
continue;
dlp->dup = duplist->dup;
dlp = duplist;
duplist = duplist->next;
free((char *)dlp);
break;
}
if (dlp == NULL) {
clrbmap(blkno);
n_blks--;
}
}
}
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
/*
* If all successfully returned, account for them.
*/
if (nfrags == 0) {
cgbp = cglookup(dtog(&sblock, idesc->id_blkno));
cgp = cgbp->b_un.b_cg;
if (idesc->id_numfrags == sblock.fs_frag)
cgp->cg_cs.cs_nbfree++;
else
cgp->cg_cs.cs_nffree += idesc->id_numfrags;
cgdirty(cgbp);
}
return (KEEPON);
}
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
/*
* Prepare a snapshot file for being removed.
*/
void
snapremove(ino_t inum)
{
struct inodesc idesc;
struct inode ip;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < snapcnt; i++)
if (snaplist[i].i_number == inum)
break;
if (i == snapcnt)
ginode(inum, &ip);
else
ip = snaplist[i];
if ((DIP(ip.i_dp, di_flags) & SF_SNAPSHOT) == 0) {
printf("snapremove: inode %jd is not a snapshot\n",
(intmax_t)inum);
if (i == snapcnt)
irelse(&ip);
return;
}
if (debug)
printf("snapremove: remove %sactive snapshot %jd\n",
i == snapcnt ? "in" : "", (intmax_t)inum);
/*
* If on active snapshot list, remove it.
*/
if (i < snapcnt) {
for (i++; i < FSMAXSNAP; i++) {
if (sblock.fs_snapinum[i] == 0)
break;
snaplist[i - 1] = snaplist[i];
sblock.fs_snapinum[i - 1] = sblock.fs_snapinum[i];
}
sblock.fs_snapinum[i - 1] = 0;
bzero(&snaplist[i - 1], sizeof(struct inode));
snapcnt--;
}
memset(&idesc, 0, sizeof(struct inodesc));
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
idesc.id_type = SNAP;
idesc.id_func = snapclean;
idesc.id_number = inum;
(void)ckinode(ip.i_dp, &idesc);
DIP_SET(ip.i_dp, di_flags, DIP(ip.i_dp, di_flags) & ~SF_SNAPSHOT);
inodirty(&ip);
irelse(&ip);
}
static int
snapclean(struct inodesc *idesc)
{
ufs2_daddr_t blkno;
struct bufarea *bp;
union dinode *dp;
blkno = idesc->id_blkno;
if (blkno == 0)
return (KEEPON);
dp = idesc->id_dp;
if (blkno == BLK_NOCOPY || blkno == BLK_SNAP) {
if (idesc->id_lbn < UFS_NDADDR) {
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
DIP_SET(dp, di_db[idesc->id_lbn], 0);
} else {
bp = idesc->id_bp;
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
IBLK_SET(bp, bp->b_index, 0);
dirty(bp);
}
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
}
return (KEEPON);
}
/*
* Notification that a block is being freed. Return zero if the free
* should be allowed to proceed. Return non-zero if the snapshot file
* wants to claim the block. The block will be claimed if it is an
* uncopied part of one of the snapshots. It will be freed if it is
* either a BLK_NOCOPY or has already been copied in all of the snapshots.
* If a fragment is being freed, then all snapshots that care about
* it must make a copy since a snapshot file can only claim full sized
* blocks. Note that if more than one snapshot file maps the block,
* we can pick one at random to claim it. Since none of the snapshots
* can change, we are assurred that they will all see the same unmodified
* image. When deleting a snapshot file (see ino_trunc above), we
* must push any of these claimed blocks to one of the other snapshots
* that maps it. These claimed blocks are easily identified as they will
* have a block number equal to their logical block number within the
* snapshot. A copied block can never have this property because they
* must always have been allocated from a BLK_NOCOPY location.
*/
int
snapblkfree(struct fs *fs, ufs2_daddr_t bno, long size, ino_t inum,
ufs2_daddr_t (*checkblkavail)(ufs2_daddr_t blkno, long frags))
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
{
union dinode *dp;
struct inode ip;
struct bufarea *snapbp;
ufs_lbn_t lbn;
ufs2_daddr_t blkno, relblkno;
int i, frags, claimedblk, copydone;
/* If no snapshots, nothing to do */
if (snapcnt == 0)
return (0);
if (debug)
printf("snapblkfree: in ino %jd free blkno %jd, size %jd\n",
(intmax_t)inum, (intmax_t)bno, (intmax_t)size);
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
relblkno = blknum(fs, bno);
lbn = fragstoblks(fs, relblkno);
/* Direct blocks are always pre-copied */
if (lbn < UFS_NDADDR)
return (0);
copydone = 0;
claimedblk = 0;
for (i = 0; i < snapcnt; i++) {
/*
* Lookup block being freed.
*/
ip = snaplist[i];
dp = ip.i_dp;
blkno = ino_blkatoff(dp, inum != 0 ? inum : ip.i_number,
lbn, &frags, &snapbp);
/*
* Check to see if block needs to be copied.
*/
if (blkno == 0) {
/*
* A block that we map is being freed. If it has not
* been claimed yet, we will claim or copy it (below).
*/
claimedblk = 1;
} else if (blkno == BLK_SNAP) {
/*
* No previous snapshot claimed the block,
* so it will be freed and become a BLK_NOCOPY
* (don't care) for us.
*/
if (claimedblk)
pfatal("snapblkfree: inconsistent block type");
IBLK_SET(snapbp, snapbp->b_index, BLK_NOCOPY);
dirty(snapbp);
brelse(snapbp);
continue;
} else /* BLK_NOCOPY or default */ {
/*
* If the snapshot has already copied the block
* (default), or does not care about the block,
* it is not needed.
*/
brelse(snapbp);
continue;
}
/*
* If this is a full size block, we will just grab it
* and assign it to the snapshot inode. Otherwise we
* will proceed to copy it. See explanation for this
* routine as to why only a single snapshot needs to
* claim this block.
*/
if (size == fs->fs_bsize) {
if (debug)
printf("Grabonremove snapshot %ju lbn %jd "
"from inum %ju\n", (intmax_t)ip.i_number,
(intmax_t)lbn, (uintmax_t)inum);
IBLK_SET(snapbp, snapbp->b_index, relblkno);
dirty(snapbp);
brelse(snapbp);
DIP_SET(dp, di_blocks,
DIP(dp, di_blocks) + btodb(size));
inodirty(&ip);
return (1);
}
/* First time through, read the contents of the old block. */
if (copydone == 0) {
copydone = 1;
if (blread(fsreadfd, copybuf, fsbtodb(fs, relblkno),
fs->fs_bsize) != 0) {
pfatal("Could not read snapshot %ju block "
"%jd\n", (intmax_t)ip.i_number,
(intmax_t)relblkno);
continue;
}
}
/*
* This allocation will never require any additional
* allocations for the snapshot inode.
*/
blkno = allocblk(dtog(fs, relblkno), fs->fs_frag,
checkblkavail);
if (blkno == 0) {
pfatal("Could not allocate block for snapshot %ju\n",
(intmax_t)ip.i_number);
continue;
}
if (debug)
printf("Copyonremove: snapino %jd lbn %jd for inum %ju "
"size %ld new blkno %jd\n", (intmax_t)ip.i_number,
(intmax_t)lbn, (uintmax_t)inum, size,
(intmax_t)blkno);
blwrite(fswritefd, copybuf, fsbtodb(fs, blkno), fs->fs_bsize);
IBLK_SET(snapbp, snapbp->b_index, blkno);
dirty(snapbp);
brelse(snapbp);
DIP_SET(dp, di_blocks,
DIP(dp, di_blocks) + btodb(fs->fs_bsize));
inodirty(&ip);
}
return (0);
}
/*
* Notification that a block is being written. Return if the block
* is part of a snapshot as snapshots never track other snapshots.
* The block will be copied in all of the snapshots that are tracking
* it and have not yet copied it. Some buffers may hold more than one
* block. Here we need to check each block in the buffer.
*/
void
copyonwrite(struct fs *fs, struct bufarea *bp,
ufs2_daddr_t (*checkblkavail)(ufs2_daddr_t blkno, long frags))
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
{
ufs2_daddr_t copyblkno;
long i, numblks;
/* If no snapshots, nothing to do. */
if (snapcnt == 0)
return;
numblks = blkroundup(fs, bp->b_size) / fs->fs_bsize;
if (debug)
prtbuf(bp, "copyonwrite: checking %jd block%s in buffer",
(intmax_t)numblks, numblks > 1 ? "s" : "");
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
copyblkno = blknum(fs, dbtofsb(fs, bp->b_bno));
for (i = 0; i < numblks; i++) {
chkcopyonwrite(fs, copyblkno, checkblkavail);
copyblkno += fs->fs_frag;
}
}
static void
chkcopyonwrite(struct fs *fs, ufs2_daddr_t copyblkno,
ufs2_daddr_t (*checkblkavail)(ufs2_daddr_t blkno, long frags))
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
{
struct inode ip;
union dinode *dp;
struct bufarea *snapbp;
ufs2_daddr_t blkno;
int i, frags, copydone;
ufs_lbn_t lbn;
lbn = fragstoblks(fs, copyblkno);
/* Direct blocks are always pre-copied */
if (lbn < UFS_NDADDR)
return;
copydone = 0;
for (i = 0; i < snapcnt; i++) {
/*
* Lookup block being freed.
*/
ip = snaplist[i];
dp = ip.i_dp;
blkno = ino_blkatoff(dp, ip.i_number, lbn, &frags, &snapbp);
/*
* Check to see if block needs to be copied.
*/
if (blkno != 0) {
/*
* A block that we have already copied or don't track.
*/
brelse(snapbp);
continue;
}
/* First time through, read the contents of the old block. */
if (copydone == 0) {
copydone = 1;
if (blread(fsreadfd, copybuf, fsbtodb(fs, copyblkno),
fs->fs_bsize) != 0) {
pfatal("Could not read snapshot %ju block "
"%jd\n", (intmax_t)ip.i_number,
(intmax_t)copyblkno);
continue;
}
}
/*
* This allocation will never require any additional
* allocations for the snapshot inode.
*/
if ((blkno = allocblk(dtog(fs, copyblkno), fs->fs_frag,
checkblkavail)) == 0) {
pfatal("Could not allocate block for snapshot %ju\n",
(intmax_t)ip.i_number);
continue;
}
if (debug)
prtbuf(snapbp, "Copyonwrite: snapino %jd lbn %jd using "
"blkno %ju setting in buffer",
(intmax_t)ip.i_number, (intmax_t)lbn,
(intmax_t)blkno);
blwrite(fswritefd, copybuf, fsbtodb(fs, blkno), fs->fs_bsize);
IBLK_SET(snapbp, snapbp->b_index, blkno);
dirty(snapbp);
brelse(snapbp);
DIP_SET(dp, di_blocks,
DIP(dp, di_blocks) + btodb(fs->fs_bsize));
inodirty(&ip);
}
return;
}
/*
* Traverse an inode and check that its block count is correct
* fixing it if necessary.
*/
void
check_blkcnt(struct inode *ip)
{
struct inodesc idesc;
union dinode *dp;
ufs2_daddr_t ndb;
int j, ret, offset;
dp = ip->i_dp;
memset(&idesc, 0, sizeof(struct inodesc));
idesc.id_func = pass1check;
idesc.id_number = ip->i_number;
idesc.id_type = (DIP(dp, di_flags) & SF_SNAPSHOT) == 0 ? ADDR : SNAP;
(void)ckinode(dp, &idesc);
if (sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS2_MAGIC && dp->dp2.di_extsize > 0) {
ndb = howmany(dp->dp2.di_extsize, sblock.fs_bsize);
for (j = 0; j < UFS_NXADDR; j++) {
if (--ndb == 0 &&
(offset = blkoff(&sblock, dp->dp2.di_extsize)) != 0)
idesc.id_numfrags = numfrags(&sblock,
fragroundup(&sblock, offset));
else
idesc.id_numfrags = sblock.fs_frag;
if (dp->dp2.di_extb[j] == 0)
continue;
idesc.id_blkno = dp->dp2.di_extb[j];
ret = (*idesc.id_func)(&idesc);
if (ret & STOP)
break;
}
}
idesc.id_entryno *= btodb(sblock.fs_fsize);
if (DIP(dp, di_blocks) != idesc.id_entryno) {
if (!(sujrecovery && preen)) {
pwarn("INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=%lu (%ju should be %ju)",
(u_long)idesc.id_number,
(uintmax_t)DIP(dp, di_blocks),
(uintmax_t)idesc.id_entryno);
if (preen)
printf(" (CORRECTED)\n");
else if (reply("CORRECT") == 0)
return;
}
if (bkgrdflag == 0) {
DIP_SET(dp, di_blocks, idesc.id_entryno);
inodirty(ip);
} else {
cmd.value = idesc.id_number;
cmd.size = idesc.id_entryno - DIP(dp, di_blocks);
if (debug)
printf("adjblkcnt ino %ju amount %lld\n",
(uintmax_t)cmd.value, (long long)cmd.size);
if (sysctl(adjblkcnt, MIBSIZE, 0, 0,
&cmd, sizeof cmd) == -1)
rwerror("ADJUST INODE BLOCK COUNT", cmd.value);
}
}
}
void
freeinodebuf(void)
{
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
struct bufarea *bp;
int i;
/*
* Flush old contents in case they have been updated.
*/
flush(fswritefd, &inobuf);
if (inobuf.b_un.b_buf != NULL)
free((char *)inobuf.b_un.b_buf);
inobuf.b_un.b_buf = NULL;
firstinum = lastinum = 0;
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
/*
* Reload the snapshot inodes in case any of them changed.
*/
for (i = 0; i < snapcnt; i++) {
bp = snaplist[i].i_bp;
bp->b_errs = blread(fsreadfd, bp->b_un.b_buf, bp->b_bno,
bp->b_size);
}
}
/*
* Routines to maintain information about directory inodes.
* This is built during the first pass and used during the
* second and third passes.
*
* Enter inodes into the cache.
*/
struct inoinfo *
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
cacheino(union dinode *dp, ino_t inumber)
{
struct inoinfo *inp;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
int i, blks;
if (getinoinfo(inumber) != NULL)
pfatal("cacheino: duplicate entry for ino %jd\n",
(intmax_t)inumber);
if (howmany(DIP(dp, di_size), sblock.fs_bsize) > UFS_NDADDR)
blks = UFS_NDADDR + UFS_NIADDR;
else if (DIP(dp, di_size) > 0)
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
blks = howmany(DIP(dp, di_size), sblock.fs_bsize);
else
blks = 1;
inp = (struct inoinfo *)
Malloc(sizeof(*inp) + (blks - 1) * sizeof(ufs2_daddr_t));
if (inp == NULL)
errx(EEXIT, "cannot increase directory list");
SLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&inphash[inumber % dirhash], inp, i_hash);
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
inp->i_flags = 0;
inp->i_parent = inumber == UFS_ROOTINO ? UFS_ROOTINO : (ino_t)0;
inp->i_dotdot = (ino_t)0;
inp->i_number = inumber;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
inp->i_isize = DIP(dp, di_size);
Improvement in UFS/FFS directory placement when doing mkdir(2). The algorithm for laying out new directories was devised in the 1980s and markedly improved the performance of the filesystem. In those days large disks had at most 100 cylinder groups and often as few as 10-20. Modern multi-terrabyte disks have thousands of cylinder groups. The original algorithm does not handle these large sizes well. This change attempts to expand the scope of the original algorithm to work well with these much larger disks while still retaining the properties of the original algorithm for small disks. The filesystem implementation is divided into policy routines and implementation routines. The policy routines can be changed in any way desired without risk of corrupting the filesystem. The policy requests are handled by the implementation layer. If the policy asks for an available resource, it is granted. But if it asks for an already in-use resource, then the implementation will provide an available one nearby the request. Thus it is impossible for a policy to double allocate. This change is limited to the policy implementation. This change updates the ffs_dirpref() routine which is responsible for selecting the cylinder group into which a new directory should be placed. If we are near the root of the filesystem we aim to spread them out as much as possible. As we descend deeper from the root we cluster them closer together around their parent as we expect them to be more closely interactive. Higher-level directories like usr/src/sys and usr/src/bin should be separated while the directories in these areas are more likely to be accessed together so should be closer. And directories within commands or kernel subsystems should be closer still. We pick a range of cylinder groups around the cylinder group of the directory in which we are being created. The size of the range for our search is based on our depth from the root of our filesystem. We then probe that range based on how many directories are already present. The first new directory is at 1/2 (middle) of the range; the second is in the first 1/4 of the range, then at 3/4, 1/8, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8, 1/16, 3/16, 5/16, etc. It is desirable to store the depth of a directory in its on-disk inode so that it is available when we need it. We add a new field di_dirdepth to track the depth of each directory. Because there are few spare fields left in the inode, we choose to share an existing field in the inode rather than having one of our own. Specifically we create a union with the di_freelink field. The di_freelink field is used to track inodes that have been unlinked but remain referenced. It is not needed until a rmdir(2) operation has been done on a directory. At that point, the directory has no contents and even if it is kept active as a current directory is no longer able to have any new directories or files created in it. Thus the use of di_dirdepth and di_freelink will never coincide. Reported by: Timo Voelker Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D39246
2023-03-30 04:09:39 +00:00
inp->i_depth = DIP(dp, di_dirdepth);
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
inp->i_numblks = blks;
for (i = 0; i < MIN(blks, UFS_NDADDR); i++)
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
inp->i_blks[i] = DIP(dp, di_db[i]);
if (blks > UFS_NDADDR)
for (i = 0; i < UFS_NIADDR; i++)
inp->i_blks[UFS_NDADDR + i] = DIP(dp, di_ib[i]);
if (inplast == listmax) {
listmax += 100;
inpsort = (struct inoinfo **)reallocarray((char *)inpsort,
listmax, sizeof(struct inoinfo *));
if (inpsort == NULL)
errx(EEXIT, "cannot increase directory list");
}
inpsort[inplast++] = inp;
return (inp);
}
/*
* Look up an inode cache structure.
*/
struct inoinfo *
getinoinfo(ino_t inumber)
{
struct inoinfo *inp;
SLIST_FOREACH(inp, &inphash[inumber % dirhash], i_hash) {
if (inp->i_number != inumber)
continue;
return (inp);
}
return (NULL);
}
/*
* Remove an entry from the inode cache and disk-order sorted list.
* Return 0 on success and 1 on failure.
*/
int
removecachedino(ino_t inumber)
{
struct inoinfo *inp, **inpp;
char *listtype;
listtype = "hash";
SLIST_FOREACH(inp, &inphash[inumber % dirhash], i_hash) {
if (inp->i_number != inumber)
continue;
SLIST_REMOVE(&inphash[inumber % dirhash], inp, inoinfo, i_hash);
for (inpp = &inpsort[inplast - 1]; inpp >= inpsort; inpp--) {
if (*inpp != inp)
continue;
*inpp = inpsort[inplast - 1];
inplast--;
free(inp);
return (0);
}
listtype = "sort";
break;
}
pfatal("removecachedino: entry for ino %jd not found on %s list\n",
(intmax_t)inumber, listtype);
return (1);
}
/*
* Clean up all the inode cache structure.
*/
void
inocleanup(void)
{
struct inoinfo **inpp;
if (inphash == NULL)
return;
for (inpp = &inpsort[inplast - 1]; inpp >= inpsort; inpp--)
free((char *)(*inpp));
free((char *)inphash);
inphash = NULL;
free((char *)inpsort);
inpsort = NULL;
}
1995-05-30 06:12:45 +00:00
void
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(struct inode *ip)
{
if (sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS2_MAGIC)
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ffs_update_dinode_ckhash(&sblock,
(struct ufs2_dinode *)ip->i_dp);
dirty(ip->i_bp);
}
void
clri(struct inodesc *idesc, const char *type, int flag)
{
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode *dp;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(idesc->id_number, &ip);
dp = ip.i_dp;
if (flag == 1) {
pwarn("%s %s", type,
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
(DIP(dp, di_mode) & IFMT) == IFDIR ? "DIR" : "FILE");
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
prtinode(&ip);
printf("\n");
}
if (preen || reply("CLEAR") == 1) {
if (preen)
printf(" (CLEARED)\n");
n_files--;
if (bkgrdflag == 0) {
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
if (idesc->id_type == SNAP) {
snapremove(idesc->id_number);
idesc->id_type = ADDR;
}
(void)ckinode(dp, idesc);
inoinfo(idesc->id_number)->ino_state = USTATE;
clearinode(dp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
} else {
cmd.value = idesc->id_number;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
cmd.size = -DIP(dp, di_nlink);
if (debug)
printf("adjrefcnt ino %ld amt %lld\n",
(long)cmd.value, (long long)cmd.size);
if (sysctl(adjrefcnt, MIBSIZE, 0, 0,
&cmd, sizeof cmd) == -1)
rwerror("ADJUST INODE", cmd.value);
}
}
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
irelse(&ip);
}
int
findname(struct inodesc *idesc)
{
struct direct *dirp = idesc->id_dirp;
if (dirp->d_ino != idesc->id_parent || idesc->id_entryno < 2) {
idesc->id_entryno++;
return (KEEPON);
}
memmove(idesc->id_name, dirp->d_name, (size_t)dirp->d_namlen + 1);
return (STOP|FOUND);
}
int
findino(struct inodesc *idesc)
{
struct direct *dirp = idesc->id_dirp;
if (dirp->d_ino == 0)
return (KEEPON);
if (strcmp(dirp->d_name, idesc->id_name) == 0 &&
dirp->d_ino >= UFS_ROOTINO && dirp->d_ino < maxino) {
idesc->id_parent = dirp->d_ino;
return (STOP|FOUND);
}
return (KEEPON);
}
int
clearentry(struct inodesc *idesc)
{
struct direct *dirp = idesc->id_dirp;
if (dirp->d_ino != idesc->id_parent || idesc->id_entryno < 2) {
idesc->id_entryno++;
return (KEEPON);
}
dirp->d_ino = 0;
return (STOP|FOUND|ALTERED);
}
void
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
prtinode(struct inode *ip)
{
char *p;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
union dinode *dp;
struct passwd *pw;
time_t t;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
dp = ip->i_dp;
printf(" I=%lu ", (u_long)ip->i_number);
if (ip->i_number < UFS_ROOTINO || ip->i_number >= maxino)
return;
printf(" OWNER=");
if ((pw = getpwuid((int)DIP(dp, di_uid))) != NULL)
printf("%s ", pw->pw_name);
else
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
printf("%u ", (unsigned)DIP(dp, di_uid));
printf("MODE=%o\n", DIP(dp, di_mode));
if (preen)
printf("%s: ", cdevname);
printf("SIZE=%ju ", (uintmax_t)DIP(dp, di_size));
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
t = DIP(dp, di_mtime);
if ((p = ctime(&t)) != NULL)
printf("MTIME=%12.12s %4.4s ", &p[4], &p[20]);
}
void
blkerror(ino_t ino, const char *type, ufs2_daddr_t blk)
{
pfatal("%jd %s I=%ju", (intmax_t)blk, type, (uintmax_t)ino);
printf("\n");
switch (inoinfo(ino)->ino_state) {
case FSTATE:
case FZLINK:
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = FCLEAR;
return;
case DSTATE:
case DZLINK:
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = DCLEAR;
return;
case FCLEAR:
case DCLEAR:
return;
default:
errx(EEXIT, "BAD STATE %d TO BLKERR", inoinfo(ino)->ino_state);
/* NOTREACHED */
}
}
/*
* allocate an unused inode
*/
ino_t
allocino(ino_t request, int type)
{
ino_t ino;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode *dp;
struct bufarea *cgbp;
struct cg *cgp;
int cg, anyino;
anyino = 0;
if (request == 0) {
request = UFS_ROOTINO;
anyino = 1;
} else if (inoinfo(request)->ino_state != USTATE)
return (0);
retry:
for (ino = request; ino < maxino; ino++)
if (inoinfo(ino)->ino_state == USTATE)
break;
if (ino >= maxino)
return (0);
cg = ino_to_cg(&sblock, ino);
cgbp = cglookup(cg);
cgp = cgbp->b_un.b_cg;
if (!check_cgmagic(cg, cgbp)) {
if (anyino == 0)
return (0);
request = (cg + 1) * sblock.fs_ipg;
goto retry;
}
setbit(cg_inosused(cgp), ino % sblock.fs_ipg);
cgp->cg_cs.cs_nifree--;
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
switch (type & IFMT) {
case IFDIR:
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = DSTATE;
cgp->cg_cs.cs_ndir++;
break;
2018-03-17 12:59:55 +00:00
case IFREG:
case IFLNK:
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = FSTATE;
break;
default:
return (0);
}
cgdirty(cgbp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(ino, &ip);
dp = ip.i_dp;
memset(dp, 0, ((sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) ?
sizeof(struct ufs1_dinode) : sizeof(struct ufs2_dinode)));
Add support for managing UFS/FFS snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). The kernel handles the managment of UFS/FFS snapshots. Since UFS/FFS updates filesystem data (rather than always writing changes to new locations like ZFS), the kernel must check every filesystem write to see if the block being written is part of a snapshot. If it is part of a snapshot, then the kernel must make a copy of the old block value into a newly allocated block for the snapshot before allowing the write to be done. Similarly, if a block is being freed, the kernel must check to see if it is part of a snapshot and let the snapshot claim the block rather than freeing it for future use. When a snapshot is freed, its blocks need to be offered to older snapshots and freed only if no older snapshots wish to claim them. When snapshots were added to UFS/FFS they were integrated into soft updates and just a small part of the management of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) as soft updates minimized the set of snapshot changes that might need correction. When journaling was added to soft updates a much more complete knowledge of snapshots needed to be added to fsck_ffs(8) for it to be able to properly handle the filesystem changes that a journal rollback needs to do (specifically the freeing and allocation of blocks). Since this functionality was unavailable, the use of snapshots was disabled when running with journaled soft updates. This set of changes imports the kernel code for the management of snapshots to fsck_ffs(8). With this code in place it will become possible to enable snapshots when running with journalled soft updates. The most immediate benefit will be the ability to use snapshots to take consistent filesystem dumps on live filesystems. Future work will be done to update fsck_ffs(8) to be able to use snapshots to run in background on live filesystems running with journaled soft updates. Reviewed by: kib Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D36491
2022-11-09 18:44:03 +00:00
DIP_SET(dp, di_db[0], allocblk(ino_to_cg(&sblock, ino), (long)1,
std_checkblkavail));
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
if (DIP(dp, di_db[0]) == 0) {
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = USTATE;
inodirty(&ip);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
irelse(&ip);
return (0);
}
DIP_SET(dp, di_mode, type);
DIP_SET(dp, di_atime, time(NULL));
DIP_SET(dp, di_ctime, DIP(dp, di_atime));
DIP_SET(dp, di_mtime, DIP(dp, di_ctime));
DIP_SET(dp, di_size, sblock.fs_fsize);
DIP_SET(dp, di_blocks, btodb(sblock.fs_fsize));
n_files++;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
irelse(&ip);
inoinfo(ino)->ino_type = IFTODT(type);
return (ino);
}
/*
* deallocate an inode
*/
void
freeino(ino_t ino)
{
struct inodesc idesc;
This commit adds basic support for the UFS2 filesystem. The UFS2 filesystem expands the inode to 256 bytes to make space for 64-bit block pointers. It also adds a file-creation time field, an ability to use jumbo blocks per inode to allow extent like pointer density, and space for extended attributes (up to twice the filesystem block size worth of attributes, e.g., on a 16K filesystem, there is space for 32K of attributes). UFS2 fully supports and runs existing UFS1 filesystems. New filesystems built using newfs can be built in either UFS1 or UFS2 format using the -O option. In this commit UFS1 is the default format, so if you want to build UFS2 format filesystems, you must specify -O 2. This default will be changed to UFS2 when UFS2 proves itself to be stable. In this commit the boot code for reading UFS2 filesystems is not compiled (see /sys/boot/common/ufsread.c) as there is insufficient space in the boot block. Once the size of the boot block is increased, this code can be defined. Things to note: the definition of SBSIZE has changed to SBLOCKSIZE. The header file <ufs/ufs/dinode.h> must be included before <ufs/ffs/fs.h> so as to get the definitions of ufs2_daddr_t and ufs_lbn_t. Still TODO: Verify that the first level bootstraps work for all the architectures. Convert the utility ffsinfo to understand UFS2 and test growfs. Add support for the extended attribute storage. Update soft updates to ensure integrity of extended attribute storage. Switch the current extended attribute interfaces to use the extended attribute storage. Add the extent like functionality (framework is there, but is currently never used). Sponsored by: DARPA & NAI Labs. Reviewed by: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>
2002-06-21 06:18:05 +00:00
union dinode *dp;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
struct inode ip;
memset(&idesc, 0, sizeof(struct inodesc));
idesc.id_type = ADDR;
idesc.id_func = freeblock;
idesc.id_number = ino;
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
ginode(ino, &ip);
dp = ip.i_dp;
(void)ckinode(dp, &idesc);
clearinode(dp);
Rewrite the disk I/O management system in fsck_ffs(8). Other than making fsck_ffs(8) run faster, there should be no functional change. The original fsck_ffs(8) had its own disk I/O management system. When gjournal(8) was added to FreeBSD 7, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary gjournal rollback. Rather than use the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O system, it wrote its own from scratch. Similarly when journalled soft updates were added in FreeBSD 9, code was added to fsck_ffs(8) to do the necessary journal rollback. And once again, rather than using either of the existing fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O systems, it wrote its own from scratch. Lastly the fsdb(8) utility uses the fsck_ffs(8) disk I/O management system. In preparation for making the changes necessary to enable snapshots to be taken when using journalled soft updates, it was necessary to have a single disk I/O system used by all the various subsystems in fsck_ffs(8). This commit merges the functionality required by all the different subsystems into a single disk I/O system that supports all of their needs. In so doing it picks up optimizations from each of them with the results that each of the subsystems does fewer reads and writes than it did with its own customized I/O system. It also greatly simplifies making changes to fsck_ffs(8) since everything goes through a single place. For example the ginode() function fetches an inode from the disk. When inode check hashes were added, they previously had to be checked in the code implementing inode fetch in each of the three different disk I/O systems. Now they need only be checked in ginode(). Tested by: Peter Holm Sponsored by: Netflix
2021-01-07 01:37:08 +00:00
inodirty(&ip);
irelse(&ip);
inoinfo(ino)->ino_state = USTATE;
n_files--;
}