freebsd-dev/usr.bin/compress/doc/README

	@(#)README	8.1 (Berkeley) 6/9/93
  $FreeBSD$

Compress version 4.0 improvements over 3.0:
	o compress() speedup (10-50%) by changing division hash to xor
	o decompress() speedup (5-10%)
	o Memory requirements reduced (3-30%)
	o Stack requirements reduced to less than 4kb
	o Removed 'Big+Fast' compress code (FBITS) because of compress speedup
    	o Portability mods for Z8000 and PC/XT (but not zeus 3.2)
	o Default to 'quiet' mode
	o Unification of 'force' flags
	o Manual page overhaul
	o Portability enhancement for M_XENIX
	o Removed text on #else and #endif
	o Added "-V" switch to print version and options
	o Added #defines for SIGNED_COMPARE_SLOW
	o Added Makefile and "usermem" program
	o Removed all floating point computations
	o New programs: [deleted]

The "usermem" script attempts to determine the maximum process size.  Some
editing of the script may be necessary (see the comments).  [It should work
fine on 4.3 BSD.] If you can't get it to work at all, just create file
"USERMEM" containing the maximum process size in decimal.

The following preprocessor symbols control the compilation of "compress.c":

	o USERMEM		Maximum process memory on the system
	o SACREDMEM		Amount to reserve for other processes
	o SIGNED_COMPARE_SLOW	Unsigned compare instructions are faster
	o NO_UCHAR		Don't use "unsigned char" types
	o BITS			Overrules default set by USERMEM-SACREDMEM
	o vax			Generate inline assembler
	o interdata		Defines SIGNED_COMPARE_SLOW
	o M_XENIX		Makes arrays < 65536 bytes each
	o pdp11			BITS=12, NO_UCHAR
	o z8000			BITS=12
	o pcxt			BITS=12
	o BSD4_2		Allow long filenames ( > 14 characters) &
				Call setlinebuf(stderr)

The difference "usermem-sacredmem" determines the maximum BITS that can be
specified with the "-b" flag.

memory: at least		BITS
------  -- -----                ----
     433,484			 16
     229,600			 15
     127,536			 14
      73,464			 13
           0			 12

The default is BITS=16.

The maximum bits can be overruled by specifying "-DBITS=bits" at
compilation time.

WARNING: files compressed on a large machine with more bits than allowed by 
a version of compress on a smaller machine cannot be decompressed!  Use the
"-b12" flag to generate a file on a large machine that can be uncompressed 
on a 16-bit machine.

The output of compress 4.0 is fully compatible with that of compress 3.0.
In other words, the output of compress 4.0 may be fed into uncompress 3.0 or
the output of compress 3.0 may be fed into uncompress 4.0.

The output of compress 4.0 not compatible with that of
compress 2.0.  However, compress 4.0 still accepts the output of
compress 2.0.  To generate output that is compatible with compress
2.0, use the undocumented "-C" flag.

	-from mod.sources, submitted by vax135!petsd!joe (Joe Orost), 8/1/85
--------------------------------

Enclosed is compress version 3.0 with the following changes:

1.	"Block" compression is performed.  After the BITS run out, the
	compression ratio is checked every so often.  If it is decreasing,
	the table is cleared and a new set of substrings are generated.

	This makes the output of compress 3.0 not compatible with that of
	compress 2.0.  However, compress 3.0 still accepts the output of
	compress 2.0.  To generate output that is compatible with compress
	2.0, use the undocumented "-C" flag.

2.	A quiet "-q" flag has been added for use by the news system.

3.	The character chaining has been deleted and the program now uses
	hashing.  This improves the speed of the program, especially
	during decompression.  Other speed improvements have been made,
	such as using putc() instead of fwrite().

4.	A large table is used on large machines when a relatively small
	number of bits is specified.  This saves much time when compressing
	for a 16-bit machine on a 32-bit virtual machine.  Note that the
	speed improvement only occurs when the input file is > 30000
	characters, and the -b BITS is less than or equal to the cutoff
	described below.

Most of these changes were made by James A. Woods (ames!jaw).  Thank you
James!

To compile compress:

	cc -O -DUSERMEM=usermem -o compress compress.c

Where "usermem" is the amount of physical user memory available (in bytes).  
If any physical memory is to be reserved for other processes, put in 
"-DSACREDMEM sacredmem", where "sacredmem" is the amount to be reserved.

The difference "usermem-sacredmem" determines the maximum BITS that can be
specified, and the cutoff bits where the large+fast table is used.

memory: at least		BITS		cutoff
------  -- -----                ----            ------
   4,718,592 			 16		  13
   2,621,440 			 16		  12
   1,572,864			 16		  11
   1,048,576			 16		  10
     631,808			 16               --
     329,728			 15               --
     178,176			 14		  --
      99,328			 13		  --
           0			 12		  --

The default memory size is 750,000 which gives a maximum BITS=16 and no
large+fast table.

The maximum bits can be overruled by specifying "-DBITS=bits" at
compilation time.

If your machine doesn't support unsigned characters, define "NO_UCHAR" 
when compiling.

If your machine has "int" as 16-bits, define "SHORT_INT" when compiling.

After compilation, move "compress" to a standard executable location, such 
as /usr/local.  Then:
	cd /usr/local
	ln compress uncompress
	ln compress zcat

On machines that have a fixed stack size (such as Perkin-Elmer), set the
stack to at least 12kb.  ("setstack compress 12" on Perkin-Elmer).

Next, install the manual (compress.l).
	cp compress.l /usr/man/manl
	cd /usr/man/manl
	ln compress.l uncompress.l
	ln compress.l zcat.l

		- or -

	cp compress.l /usr/man/man1/compress.1
	cd /usr/man/man1
	ln compress.1 uncompress.1
	ln compress.1 zcat.1

					regards,
					petsd!joe

Here is a note from the net:

>From hplabs!pesnta!amd!turtlevax!ken Sat Jan  5 03:35:20 1985
Path: ames!hplabs!pesnta!amd!turtlevax!ken
From: ken@turtlevax.UUCP (Ken Turkowski)
Newsgroups: net.sources
Subject: Re: Compress release 3.0 : sample Makefile
Organization: CADLINC, Inc. @ Menlo Park, CA

In the compress 3.0 source recently posted to mod.sources, there is a
#define variable which can be set for optimum performance on a machine
with a large amount of memory.  A program (usermem) to calculate the
usable amount of physical user memory is enclosed, as well as a sample
4.2BSD Vax Makefile for compress.

Here is the README file from the previous version of compress (2.0):

>Enclosed is compress.c version 2.0 with the following bugs fixed:
>
>1.	The packed files produced by compress are different on different
>	machines and dependent on the vax sysgen option.
>		The bug was in the different byte/bit ordering on the
>		various machines.  This has been fixed.
>
>		This version is NOT compatible with the original vax posting
>		unless the '-DCOMPATIBLE' option is specified to the C
>		compiler.  The original posting has a bug which I fixed, 
>		causing incompatible files.  I recommend you NOT to use this
>		option unless you already have a lot of packed files from
>		the original posting by Thomas.
>2.	The exit status is not well defined (on some machines) causing the
>	scripts to fail.
>		The exit status is now 0,1 or 2 and is documented in
>		compress.l.
>3.	The function getopt() is not available in all C libraries.
>		The function getopt() is no longer referenced by the
>		program.
>4.	Error status is not being checked on the fwrite() and fflush() calls.
>		Fixed.
>
>The following enhancements have been made:
>
>1.	Added facilities of "compact" into the compress program.  "Pack",
>	"Unpack", and "Pcat" are no longer required (no longer supplied).
>2.	Installed work around for C compiler bug with "-O".
>3.	Added a magic number header (\037\235).  Put the bits specified
>	in the file.
>4.	Added "-f" flag to force overwrite of output file.
>5.	Added "-c" flag and "zcat" program.  'ln compress zcat' after you
>	compile.
>6.	The 'uncompress' script has been deleted; simply 
>	'ln compress uncompress' after you compile and it will work.
>7.	Removed extra bit masking for machines that support unsigned
>	characters.  If your machine doesn't support unsigned characters,
>	define "NO_UCHAR" when compiling.
>
>Compile "compress.c" with "-O -o compress" flags.  Move "compress" to a
>standard executable location, such as /usr/local.  Then:
>	cd /usr/local
>	ln compress uncompress
>	ln compress zcat
>
>On machines that have a fixed stack size (such as Perkin-Elmer), set the
>stack to at least 12kb.  ("setstack compress 12" on Perkin-Elmer).
>
>Next, install the manual (compress.l).
>	cp compress.l /usr/man/manl		- or -
>	cp compress.l /usr/man/man1/compress.1
>
>Here is the README that I sent with my first posting:
>
>>Enclosed is a modified version of compress.c, along with scripts to make it
>>run identically to pack(1), unpack(1), an pcat(1).  Here is what I
>>(petsd!joe) and a colleague (petsd!peora!srd) did:
>>
>>1. Removed VAX dependencies.
>>2. Changed the struct to separate arrays; saves mucho memory.
>>3. Did comparisons in unsigned, where possible.  (Faster on Perkin-Elmer.)
>>4. Sorted the character next chain and changed the search to stop
>>prematurely.  This saves a lot on the execution time when compressing.
>>
>>This version is totally compatible with the original version.  Even though
>>lint(1) -p has no complaints about compress.c, it won't run on a 16-bit
>>machine, due to the size of the arrays.
>>
>>Here is the README file from the original author:
>> 
>>>Well, with all this discussion about file compression (for news batching
>>>in particular) going around, I decided to implement the text compression
>>>algorithm described in the June Computer magazine.  The author claimed
>>>blinding speed and good compression ratios.  It's certainly faster than
>>>compact (but, then, what wouldn't be), but it's also the same speed as
>>>pack, and gets better compression than both of them.  On 350K bytes of
>>>Unix-wizards, compact took about 8 minutes of CPU, pack took about 80
>>>seconds, and compress (herein) also took 80 seconds.  But, compact and
>>>pack got about 30% compression, whereas compress got over 50%.  So, I
>>>decided I had something, and that others might be interested, too.
>>>
>>>As is probably true of compact and pack (although I haven't checked),
>>>the byte order within a word is probably relevant here, but as long as
>>>you stay on a single machine type, you should be ok.  (Can anybody
>>>elucidate on this?)  There are a couple of asm's in the code (extv and
>>>insv instructions), so anyone porting it to another machine will have to
>>>deal with this anyway (and could probably make it compatible with Vax
>>>byte order at the same time).  Anyway, I've linted the code (both with
>>>and without -p), so it should run elsewhere.  Note the longs in the
>>>code, you can take these out if you reduce BITS to <= 15.
>>>
>>>Have fun, and as always, if you make good enhancements, or bug fixes,
>>>I'd like to see them.
>>>
>>>=Spencer (thomas@utah-20, {harpo,hplabs,arizona}!utah-cs!thomas)
>>
>>					regards,
>>					joe
>>
>>--
>>Full-Name:  Joseph M. Orost
>>UUCP:       ..!{decvax,ucbvax,ihnp4}!vax135!petsd!joe
>>US Mail:    MS 313; Perkin-Elmer; 106 Apple St; Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
>>Phone:      (201) 870-5844