d/freebsd-dev
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
65e26c5e18
freebsd-dev/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/mips-freebsd/Makefile

22 lines
515 B
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Add TARGET_ARCH=mipsel and TARGET_ARCH=mipseb as a valid targets. Unlike the unisex architecutres we've had so far, mips is bisexual. These tools can produce either byte sex, and the compiler/make determines the proper gender to use. Otherwise, we'd have to have had mipsel and mipseb in all the places that we have just mips. And there are other complications with doing that (binutils doesn't like to build mips tools without both byte genders, it seems). Introduced BINUTIL_ARCH so that other bisexual architectures can a generic mechanism. We cannot just define MACHINE_ARCH as mips because we need to differentiate big and little endian types of binaries. Discussions on freebsd-arch have hashed out this issue (and the parallel libc issues). NetBSD is moving towards mipsel and mipseb for their two flavors of mips ports (in time for 1.4, if this change hasn't already been accomplished). I've been building i386 worlds with this tree for a three months with these files in place with no ill effects.
1999-03-01 04:01:57 +00:00
#
$Id$ -> $FreeBSD$
1999-08-27 23:37:10 +00:00
# $FreeBSD$
Add TARGET_ARCH=mipsel and TARGET_ARCH=mipseb as a valid targets. Unlike the unisex architecutres we've had so far, mips is bisexual. These tools can produce either byte sex, and the compiler/make determines the proper gender to use. Otherwise, we'd have to have had mipsel and mipseb in all the places that we have just mips. And there are other complications with doing that (binutils doesn't like to build mips tools without both byte genders, it seems). Introduced BINUTIL_ARCH so that other bisexual architectures can a generic mechanism. We cannot just define MACHINE_ARCH as mips because we need to differentiate big and little endian types of binaries. Discussions on freebsd-arch have hashed out this issue (and the parallel libc issues). NetBSD is moving towards mipsel and mipseb for their two flavors of mips ports (in time for 1.4, if this change hasn't already been accomplished). I've been building i386 worlds with this tree for a three months with these files in place with no ill effects.
1999-03-01 04:01:57 +00:00
#
.include "${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc0"
PROG= as
Don't change the name when building a cross-tool. Just set the BINDIR to /usr/libexec/cross/${MACHINE_ARCH}-freebsdelf.
1999-11-06 21:59:29 +00:00
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "mipsel" && ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "mipseb"
NOMAN= 1
Replace freebsdelf with freebsd in BINDIR Requested by: obrien
1999-11-07 08:07:02 +00:00
BINDIR= /usr/libexec/cross/mips-freebsd
Conditionally define "CROSS_COMPILE" here.
2000-05-22 08:25:40 +00:00
# If we aren't doing cross-assembling, some operations can be optimized, since
# byte orders and value sizes don't need to be adjusted.
CFLAGS+= -DCROSS_COMPILE=1
Add TARGET_ARCH=mipsel and TARGET_ARCH=mipseb as a valid targets. Unlike the unisex architecutres we've had so far, mips is bisexual. These tools can produce either byte sex, and the compiler/make determines the proper gender to use. Otherwise, we'd have to have had mipsel and mipseb in all the places that we have just mips. And there are other complications with doing that (binutils doesn't like to build mips tools without both byte genders, it seems). Introduced BINUTIL_ARCH so that other bisexual architectures can a generic mechanism. We cannot just define MACHINE_ARCH as mips because we need to differentiate big and little endian types of binaries. Discussions on freebsd-arch have hashed out this issue (and the parallel libc issues). NetBSD is moving towards mipsel and mipseb for their two flavors of mips ports (in time for 1.4, if this change hasn't already been accomplished). I've been building i386 worlds with this tree for a three months with these files in place with no ill effects.
1999-03-01 04:01:57 +00:00
.endif
For mips assembler, we need to define TARGET_BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN to be zero when building for little endian machines. Correct the target names for mips. We just use the generic targets for mips elf, so the mipse[lb]-unknown-freebsd emulation types don't exist.
1999-04-22 07:19:20 +00:00
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "mipsel"
CFLAGS+= -DTARGET_BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN=0
.endif
Add TARGET_ARCH=mipsel and TARGET_ARCH=mipseb as a valid targets. Unlike the unisex architecutres we've had so far, mips is bisexual. These tools can produce either byte sex, and the compiler/make determines the proper gender to use. Otherwise, we'd have to have had mipsel and mipseb in all the places that we have just mips. And there are other complications with doing that (binutils doesn't like to build mips tools without both byte genders, it seems). Introduced BINUTIL_ARCH so that other bisexual architectures can a generic mechanism. We cannot just define MACHINE_ARCH as mips because we need to differentiate big and little endian types of binaries. Discussions on freebsd-arch have hashed out this issue (and the parallel libc issues). NetBSD is moving towards mipsel and mipseb for their two flavors of mips ports (in time for 1.4, if this change hasn't already been accomplished). I've been building i386 worlds with this tree for a three months with these files in place with no ill effects.
1999-03-01 04:01:57 +00:00
SRCS+= obj-elf.c tc-mips.c itbl-ops.c itbl-parse.y itbl-lex.l
.include <bsd.prog.mk>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink