1999-12-29 18:24:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# $FreeBSD$
|
1999-12-19 13:50:37 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Execute the "real" sendmail program, named /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
pkgbase: resolve mailer.conf conflict WITHOUT_SENDMAIL
When WITHOUT_SENDMAIL is set, we end up with two different mailer.conf that
conflict, and hilarity ensues. There's currently three different places that
we might install mailer.conf:
- ^/etc/Makefile (package=runtime, contingent on MK_MAIL != no)
- ^/libexec/dma/dmagent/Makefile (package=dma, contingent on MK_SENDMAIL !=
no)
- ^/usr.sbin/mailwrapper/Makefile (package=utilities, contingent on
not-installed)
The mailwrapper installation will effectively never happen because the ^/etc
one will first.
This patch simplifies the whole situation; remove the ^/etc/Makefile version
and install it primarily in mailwrapper if MK_MAILWRAPPER != "no". The
scenarios covered in mailwrapper are:
- sendmail(8) is installed, dma(8) may or may not be installed
- neither sendmail(8) nor dma(8) is installed
In the first scenario, sendmail(8) is dominant so we can go ahead and
install the version in ^/etc/mail. In the unlisted scenario, sendmail(8) is
not installed but dma(8) is, we'll let ^/libexec/dma/dmagent do the
installation. In the second listed scenario, we still want to install an
example mailer.conf so just install the base sendmail(8) version.
Reviewed by: bapt
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24924
2020-06-02 02:38:54 +00:00
|
|
|
# If dma(8) is installed, an example mailer.conf that uses dma(8) instead can
|
|
|
|
|
# can be found in /usr/share/examples/dma.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
1999-12-19 13:50:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sendmail /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
|
|
|
|
mailq /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
|
|
|
|
newaliases /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
2002-04-05 04:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
hoststat /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
|
|
|
|
purgestat /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
|
