d/freebsd-dev
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
7d0368ee34
freebsd-dev/sbin/pfctl/tests/Makefile

13 lines
135 B
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

pfctl parser tests Copy the most important test cases from OpenBSD's corresponding src/regress/sbin/pfctl, those that run pfctl on a test input file and check correctness of its output. We have also added some new tests using the same format. The tests consist of a collection of input files (pf*.in) and corresponding output files (pf*.ok). We run pfctl -nv on the input files and check that the output matches the output files. If any discrepancy is discovered during future development in the source tree, we know that a regression bug has been introduced into the tree. Submitted by: paggas Sponsored by: Google, Inc (GSoC 2017) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11322
2017-07-15 19:22:01 +00:00
# $FreeBSD$
pkgbase: pfctl: tests: Put tests files in the FreeBSD-tests package Reviewed by: kp, gjb Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21521
2019-09-05 14:19:06 +00:00
PACKAGE= tests
Rewrite pfctl_test in C to reduce testsuite run time The new C test takes 25 seconds on QEMU-RISC-V, wheras the shell version takes 332 seconds. Even with the latest optimizations to atf-sh this test still takes a few seconds to startup in QEMU. Re-writing it in C reduces the runtime for a single test from about 2-3 seconds to less than .5 seconds. Since there are ~80 tests, this adds up to about 3-4 minutes. This may not seem like a big speedup, but before the recent optimizations to avoid atf_get_srcdir, each test took almost 100 seconds on QEMU RISC-V instead of 3. This also significantly reduces the time it takes to list the available test cases, which speeds up running the tests via kyua: ``` root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test_old ... 158/158 passed (0 failed) 332.08 real 42.58 user 286.17 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test 158/158 passed (0 failed) 24.96 real 9.75 user 14.26 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.17 real 0.06 user 0.08 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old pf1001 pfctl_test_old: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_old: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 141 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 1.73 real 0.25 user 1.41 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old -l > /dev/null 24.36 real 2.26 user 21.86 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 0.04 real 0.02 user 0.01 sys ``` The speedups are even more noticeable on CHERI-RISC-V (since QEMU runs slower when emulating CHERI instructions): ``` root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new -l > /dev/null 0.51 real 0.49 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 34.20 real 32.69 user 0.16 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 147 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 5.74 real 5.41 user 0.03 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new pf1001 pfctl_test_new: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_new: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.68 real 0.66 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # ``` Reviewed By: kp Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26779
2020-10-14 17:39:50 +00:00
ATF_TESTS_C= pfctl_test
ATF_TESTS_SH= macro
pfctl parser tests Copy the most important test cases from OpenBSD's corresponding src/regress/sbin/pfctl, those that run pfctl on a test input file and check correctness of its output. We have also added some new tests using the same format. The tests consist of a collection of input files (pf*.in) and corresponding output files (pf*.ok). We run pfctl -nv on the input files and check that the output matches the output files. If any discrepancy is discovered during future development in the source tree, we know that a regression bug has been introduced into the tree. Submitted by: paggas Sponsored by: Google, Inc (GSoC 2017) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11322
2017-07-15 19:22:01 +00:00
Rewrite pfctl_test in C to reduce testsuite run time The new C test takes 25 seconds on QEMU-RISC-V, wheras the shell version takes 332 seconds. Even with the latest optimizations to atf-sh this test still takes a few seconds to startup in QEMU. Re-writing it in C reduces the runtime for a single test from about 2-3 seconds to less than .5 seconds. Since there are ~80 tests, this adds up to about 3-4 minutes. This may not seem like a big speedup, but before the recent optimizations to avoid atf_get_srcdir, each test took almost 100 seconds on QEMU RISC-V instead of 3. This also significantly reduces the time it takes to list the available test cases, which speeds up running the tests via kyua: ``` root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test_old ... 158/158 passed (0 failed) 332.08 real 42.58 user 286.17 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test 158/158 passed (0 failed) 24.96 real 9.75 user 14.26 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.17 real 0.06 user 0.08 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old pf1001 pfctl_test_old: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_old: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 141 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 1.73 real 0.25 user 1.41 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old -l > /dev/null 24.36 real 2.26 user 21.86 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 0.04 real 0.02 user 0.01 sys ``` The speedups are even more noticeable on CHERI-RISC-V (since QEMU runs slower when emulating CHERI instructions): ``` root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new -l > /dev/null 0.51 real 0.49 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 34.20 real 32.69 user 0.16 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 147 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 5.74 real 5.41 user 0.03 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new pf1001 pfctl_test_new: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_new: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.68 real 0.66 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # ``` Reviewed By: kp Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26779
2020-10-14 17:39:50 +00:00
LIBADD+= sbuf
pfctl parser tests Copy the most important test cases from OpenBSD's corresponding src/regress/sbin/pfctl, those that run pfctl on a test input file and check correctness of its output. We have also added some new tests using the same format. The tests consist of a collection of input files (pf*.in) and corresponding output files (pf*.ok). We run pfctl -nv on the input files and check that the output matches the output files. If any discrepancy is discovered during future development in the source tree, we know that a regression bug has been introduced into the tree. Submitted by: paggas Sponsored by: Google, Inc (GSoC 2017) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11322
2017-07-15 19:22:01 +00:00
SUBDIR+= files
Rewrite pfctl_test in C to reduce testsuite run time The new C test takes 25 seconds on QEMU-RISC-V, wheras the shell version takes 332 seconds. Even with the latest optimizations to atf-sh this test still takes a few seconds to startup in QEMU. Re-writing it in C reduces the runtime for a single test from about 2-3 seconds to less than .5 seconds. Since there are ~80 tests, this adds up to about 3-4 minutes. This may not seem like a big speedup, but before the recent optimizations to avoid atf_get_srcdir, each test took almost 100 seconds on QEMU RISC-V instead of 3. This also significantly reduces the time it takes to list the available test cases, which speeds up running the tests via kyua: ``` root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test_old ... 158/158 passed (0 failed) 332.08 real 42.58 user 286.17 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:~ # /usr/bin/time kyua test -k /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/Kyuafile pfctl_test 158/158 passed (0 failed) 24.96 real 9.75 user 14.26 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.17 real 0.06 user 0.08 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old pf1001 pfctl_test_old: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_old: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 141 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 1.73 real 0.25 user 1.41 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_old -l > /dev/null 24.36 real 2.26 user 21.86 sys root@qemu-riscv64-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 0.04 real 0.02 user 0.01 sys ``` The speedups are even more noticeable on CHERI-RISC-V (since QEMU runs slower when emulating CHERI instructions): ``` root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new -l > /dev/null 0.51 real 0.49 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test -l > /dev/null 34.20 real 32.69 user 0.16 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test pf1001 pfctl_test: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Id Refs Name 147 1 pf Executing command [ pfctl -o none -nvf - ] passed 5.74 real 5.41 user 0.03 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # /usr/bin/time ./pfctl_test_new pf1001 pfctl_test_new: WARNING: Running test cases outside of kyua(1) is unsupported pfctl_test_new: WARNING: No isolation nor timeout control is being applied; you may get unexpected failures; see atf-test-case(4) Running pfctl -o none -nvf /usr/tests/sbin/pfctl/./files/pf1001.in --- binat on em0 inet6 from fc00::/64 to any -> fc00:0:0:1::/64 binat on em0 inet6 from any to fc00:0:0:1::/64 -> fc00::/64 --- passed 0.68 real 0.66 user 0.00 sys root@qemu-cheri-alex:/usr/tests/sbin/pfctl # ``` Reviewed By: kp Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26779
2020-10-14 17:39:50 +00:00
WARNS=6
pfctl parser tests Copy the most important test cases from OpenBSD's corresponding src/regress/sbin/pfctl, those that run pfctl on a test input file and check correctness of its output. We have also added some new tests using the same format. The tests consist of a collection of input files (pf*.in) and corresponding output files (pf*.ok). We run pfctl -nv on the input files and check that the output matches the output files. If any discrepancy is discovered during future development in the source tree, we know that a regression bug has been introduced into the tree. Submitted by: paggas Sponsored by: Google, Inc (GSoC 2017) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11322
2017-07-15 19:22:01 +00:00
.include <bsd.test.mk>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink