86 lines
3.2 KiB
C
86 lines
3.2 KiB
C
|
/* options.h: Configuration options the end user might want to tweak.
|
||
|
|
||
|
%%% copyright-cmetz
|
||
|
This software is Copyright 1996 by Craig Metz, All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
The Inner Net License Version 2 applies to this software.
|
||
|
You should have received a copy of the license with this software. If
|
||
|
you didn't get a copy, you may request one from <license@inner.net>.
|
||
|
|
||
|
History:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Created by cmetz for OPIE 2.3 using the old Makefile.source as a
|
||
|
guide.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Which hash should the OPIE server software use?
|
||
|
|
||
|
We strongly recommend that you use MD5. MD4 is faster, but less secure.
|
||
|
If you are migrating from Bellcore S/Key version 1 and wish to use the
|
||
|
existing key database, you must use MD4. In this case, you should consider
|
||
|
ways to re-key your users using MD5.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define MDX 5 /* Use MD5 */
|
||
|
/* #define MDX 4 /* Use MD4 */
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Ask users to re-type their secret pass phrases?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Doing so helps catch typing mistakes, but some users find it annoying.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* #define RETYPE 1 /* Ask users to re-type their secret pass phrases */
|
||
|
#define RETYPE 0 /* Don't ask users to re-type their secret pass phrases */
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Generater lock files to serialize OTP logins?
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is a potential race attack on OTP when more than one session can
|
||
|
respond to the same challenge at the same time. This locking only allows
|
||
|
one session at a time per principal (user) to attempt to log in using OTP.
|
||
|
The locking, however, creates a denial-of-service attack as a trade-off and
|
||
|
can be annoying if you have a legitimate need for two sessions to attempt
|
||
|
to authenticate as the same principal at the same time.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define USER_LOCKING 1 /* Serialize OTP challenges for a principal */
|
||
|
/* #define USER_LOCKING 0 /* Don't serialize OTP challenges */
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Should su(8) refuse to switch to disabled accounts?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Traditionally, su(8) can switch to any account, even if it is disabled.
|
||
|
In most systems, there is no legitimate need for this capability and it can
|
||
|
create security problems.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define SU_STAR_CHECK 1 /* Refuse to switch to disabled accounts */
|
||
|
/* #define SU_STAR_CHECK 0 /* Allow switching to disabled accounts */
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Should OPIE use more informative prompts?
|
||
|
|
||
|
The new-style, more informative prompts better indicate to the user what
|
||
|
is being asked for. However, some automated login scripts depend on the
|
||
|
wording of some prompts and will fail if you change them.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define NEW_PROMPTS 1 /* Use the more informative prompts */
|
||
|
/* #define NEW_PROMPTS 0 /* Use the more compatible prompts */
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
Should the user be allowed to override "insecure" terminal checks?
|
||
|
|
||
|
The "insecure" terminal checks are designed to help make it more clear
|
||
|
to users that they shouldn't disclose their secret over insecure lines
|
||
|
by refusing to accept the secret directly. These checks aren't perfect and
|
||
|
sometimes will cause OPIE to refuse to work when it really should. Allowing
|
||
|
users to override the terminal checks also helps the process of creating
|
||
|
OTP sequences for users. However, allowing users to override the terminal
|
||
|
checks also allows users to shoot themselves in the foot, which isn't usually
|
||
|
what you want.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define INSECURE_OVERRIDE 0 /* Don't allow users to override the checks */
|
||
|
/* #define INSECURE_OVERRIDE 1 /* Allow users to override the checks */
|