Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
/*-
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2014 Colin Percival
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
* SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
|
|
|
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stddef.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "primes.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Return a * b % n, where 0 < n. */
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
static uint64_t
|
|
|
|
mulmod(uint64_t a, uint64_t b, uint64_t n)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uint64_t x = 0;
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
uint64_t an = a % n;
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (b != 0) {
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (b & 1) {
|
|
|
|
x += an;
|
|
|
|
if ((x < an) || (x >= n))
|
|
|
|
x -= n;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (an + an < an)
|
|
|
|
an = an + an - n;
|
|
|
|
else if (an + an >= n)
|
|
|
|
an = an + an - n;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
an = an + an;
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
b >>= 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (x);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Return a^r % n, where 0 < n. */
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
static uint64_t
|
|
|
|
powmod(uint64_t a, uint64_t r, uint64_t n)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uint64_t x = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (r != 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (r & 1)
|
|
|
|
x = mulmod(a, x, n);
|
|
|
|
a = mulmod(a, a, n);
|
|
|
|
r >>= 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (x);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Return non-zero if n is a strong pseudoprime to base p. */
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
spsp(uint64_t n, uint64_t p)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uint64_t x;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t r = n - 1;
|
|
|
|
int k = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compute n - 1 = 2^k * r. */
|
|
|
|
while ((r & 1) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
k++;
|
|
|
|
r >>= 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compute x = p^r mod n. If x = 1, n is a p-spsp. */
|
|
|
|
x = powmod(p, r, n);
|
|
|
|
if (x == 1)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compute x^(2^i) for 0 <= i < n. If any are -1, n is a p-spsp. */
|
|
|
|
while (k > 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (x == n - 1)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
x = powmod(x, 2, n);
|
|
|
|
k--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Not a p-spsp. */
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Test for primality using strong pseudoprime tests. */
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
|
|
isprime(ubig _n)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uint64_t n = _n;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Values from:
|
|
|
|
* C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge, and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.,
|
|
|
|
* The pseudoprimes to 25 * 10^9, Math. Comp. 35(151):1003-1026, 1980.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to base 2 less than 2047. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 2))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 2047ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3 less than 1373653. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 3))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 1373653ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5 less than 25326001. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 5))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 25326001ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5,7 less than 3215031751. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 7))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 3215031751ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Values from:
|
|
|
|
* G. Jaeschke, On strong pseudoprimes to several bases,
|
|
|
|
* Math. Comp. 61(204):915-926, 1993.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5,7,11 less than 2152302898747. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 11))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 2152302898747ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5,7,11,13 less than 3474749660383. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 13))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 3474749660383ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5,7,11,13,17 less than 341550071728321. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 17))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 341550071728321ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19 less than 341550071728321. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 19))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 341550071728321ULL)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Value from:
|
|
|
|
* Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, Strong pseudoprimes to the first eight prime
|
|
|
|
* bases, Math. Comp. 83(290):2915-2924, 2014.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2..23 less than 3825123056546413051. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 23))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (n < 3825123056546413051)
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Value from:
|
|
|
|
* J. Sorenson and J. Webster, Strong pseudoprimes to twelve prime
|
|
|
|
* bases, Math. Comp. 86(304):985-1003, 2017.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-04 02:36:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/* No SPSPs to bases 2..37 less than 318665857834031151167461. */
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 29))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 31))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
if (!spsp(n, 37))
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* All 64-bit values are less than 318665857834031151167461. */
|
|
|
|
return (1);
|
Correctly enumerate primes between 4295098369 and 3825123056546413050.
Prior to this commit, primes(6) relied solely on sieving with primes up
to 65537, with the effect that composite numbers which are the product
of two non-16-bit primes would be incorrectly identified as prime. For
example,
# primes 1099511627800 1099511627820
would output
1099511627803
1099511627807
1099511627813
when in fact only the first of those values is prime.
This commit adds strong pseudoprime tests to validate the candidates
which pass the initial sieving stage, using bases of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11,
13, 17, 19, and 23. Thanks to papers from C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge,
and S.S. Wagstaff, Jr.; G. Jaeschke; and Y. Jiang and Y. Deng, we know
that the smallest value which passes these tests is 3825123056546413051.
At present we do not know how many strong pseudoprime tests are required
to prove primality for values larger than 3825123056546413050, so we
force primes(6) to stop at that point.
Reviewed by: jmg
Relnotes: primes(6) now correctly enumerates primes up to
3825123056546413050
MFC after: 7 days
Sponsored by: EuroBSDCon devsummit
2014-09-26 09:40:48 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|