freebsd-dev/module/zfs/zfs_rlock.c

632 lines
17 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* CDDL HEADER START
*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License (the "License").
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
*
* You can obtain a copy of the license at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE
* or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions
* and limitations under the License.
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file at usr/src/OPENSOLARIS.LICENSE.
* If applicable, add the following below this CDDL HEADER, with the
* fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying
* information: Portions Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
*
* CDDL HEADER END
*/
/*
* Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
* Use is subject to license terms.
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2012 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
*/
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* This file contains the code to implement file range locking in
* ZFS, although there isn't much specific to ZFS (all that comes to mind is
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
* support for growing the blocksize).
*
* Interface
* ---------
* Defined in zfs_rlock.h but essentially:
* rl = zfs_range_lock(zp, off, len, lock_type);
* zfs_range_unlock(rl);
* zfs_range_reduce(rl, off, len);
*
* AVL tree
* --------
* An AVL tree is used to maintain the state of the existing ranges
* that are locked for exclusive (writer) or shared (reader) use.
* The starting range offset is used for searching and sorting the tree.
*
* Common case
* -----------
* The (hopefully) usual case is of no overlaps or contention for
* locks. On entry to zfs_lock_range() a rl_t is allocated; the tree
* searched that finds no overlap, and *this* rl_t is placed in the tree.
*
* Overlaps/Reference counting/Proxy locks
* ---------------------------------------
* The avl code only allows one node at a particular offset. Also it's very
* inefficient to search through all previous entries looking for overlaps
* (because the very 1st in the ordered list might be at offset 0 but
* cover the whole file).
* So this implementation uses reference counts and proxy range locks.
* Firstly, only reader locks use reference counts and proxy locks,
* because writer locks are exclusive.
* When a reader lock overlaps with another then a proxy lock is created
* for that range and replaces the original lock. If the overlap
* is exact then the reference count of the proxy is simply incremented.
* Otherwise, the proxy lock is split into smaller lock ranges and
* new proxy locks created for non overlapping ranges.
* The reference counts are adjusted accordingly.
* Meanwhile, the orginal lock is kept around (this is the callers handle)
* and its offset and length are used when releasing the lock.
*
* Thread coordination
* -------------------
* In order to make wakeups efficient and to ensure multiple continuous
* readers on a range don't starve a writer for the same range lock,
* two condition variables are allocated in each rl_t.
* If a writer (or reader) can't get a range it initialises the writer
* (or reader) cv; sets a flag saying there's a writer (or reader) waiting;
* and waits on that cv. When a thread unlocks that range it wakes up all
* writers then all readers before destroying the lock.
*
* Append mode writes
* ------------------
* Append mode writes need to lock a range at the end of a file.
* The offset of the end of the file is determined under the
* range locking mutex, and the lock type converted from RL_APPEND to
* RL_WRITER and the range locked.
*
* Grow block handling
* -------------------
* ZFS supports multiple block sizes currently upto 128K. The smallest
* block size is used for the file which is grown as needed. During this
* growth all other writers and readers must be excluded.
* So if the block size needs to be grown then the whole file is
* exclusively locked, then later the caller will reduce the lock
* range to just the range to be written using zfs_reduce_range.
*/
#include <sys/zfs_rlock.h>
/*
* Check if a write lock can be grabbed, or wait and recheck until available.
*/
static void
zfs_range_lock_writer(zfs_rlock_t *zrl, rl_t *new)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
avl_tree_t *tree = &zrl->zr_avl;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
rl_t *rl;
avl_index_t where;
uint64_t end_size;
uint64_t off = new->r_off;
uint64_t len = new->r_len;
for (;;) {
/*
* Range locking is also used by zvol. However, for zvol, we
* don't need to append or grow blocksize, so skip that
* processing.
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*
* Yes, this is ugly, and would be solved by not handling
* grow or append in range lock code. If that was done then
* we could make the range locking code generically available
* to other non-zfs consumers.
*/
if (zrl->zr_size) { /* caller is ZPL */
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* If in append mode pick up the current end of file.
* This is done under z_range_lock to avoid races.
*/
if (new->r_type == RL_APPEND)
new->r_off = *zrl->zr_size;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* If we need to grow the block size then grab the whole
* file range. This is also done under z_range_lock to
* avoid races.
*/
end_size = MAX(*zrl->zr_size, new->r_off + len);
if (end_size > *zrl->zr_blksz &&
(!ISP2(*zrl->zr_blksz) ||
*zrl->zr_blksz < *zrl->zr_max_blksz)) {
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
new->r_off = 0;
new->r_len = UINT64_MAX;
}
}
/*
* First check for the usual case of no locks
*/
if (avl_numnodes(tree) == 0) {
new->r_type = RL_WRITER; /* convert to writer */
avl_add(tree, new);
return;
}
/*
* Look for any locks in the range.
*/
rl = avl_find(tree, new, &where);
if (rl)
goto wait; /* already locked at same offset */
rl = (rl_t *)avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
if (rl && (rl->r_off < new->r_off + new->r_len))
goto wait;
rl = (rl_t *)avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_BEFORE);
if (rl && rl->r_off + rl->r_len > new->r_off)
goto wait;
new->r_type = RL_WRITER; /* convert possible RL_APPEND */
avl_insert(tree, new, where);
return;
wait:
if (!rl->r_write_wanted) {
cv_init(&rl->r_wr_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
rl->r_write_wanted = B_TRUE;
}
cv_wait(&rl->r_wr_cv, &zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/* reset to original */
new->r_off = off;
new->r_len = len;
}
}
/*
* If this is an original (non-proxy) lock then replace it by
* a proxy and return the proxy.
*/
static rl_t *
zfs_range_proxify(avl_tree_t *tree, rl_t *rl)
{
rl_t *proxy;
if (rl->r_proxy)
return (rl); /* already a proxy */
ASSERT3U(rl->r_cnt, ==, 1);
ASSERT(rl->r_write_wanted == B_FALSE);
ASSERT(rl->r_read_wanted == B_FALSE);
avl_remove(tree, rl);
rl->r_cnt = 0;
/* create a proxy range lock */
proxy = kmem_alloc(sizeof (rl_t), KM_SLEEP);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
proxy->r_off = rl->r_off;
proxy->r_len = rl->r_len;
proxy->r_cnt = 1;
proxy->r_type = RL_READER;
proxy->r_proxy = B_TRUE;
proxy->r_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
proxy->r_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
avl_add(tree, proxy);
return (proxy);
}
/*
* Split the range lock at the supplied offset
* returning the *front* proxy.
*/
static rl_t *
zfs_range_split(avl_tree_t *tree, rl_t *rl, uint64_t off)
{
rl_t *front, *rear;
ASSERT3U(rl->r_len, >, 1);
ASSERT3U(off, >, rl->r_off);
ASSERT3U(off, <, rl->r_off + rl->r_len);
ASSERT(rl->r_write_wanted == B_FALSE);
ASSERT(rl->r_read_wanted == B_FALSE);
/* create the rear proxy range lock */
rear = kmem_alloc(sizeof (rl_t), KM_SLEEP);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
rear->r_off = off;
rear->r_len = rl->r_off + rl->r_len - off;
rear->r_cnt = rl->r_cnt;
rear->r_type = RL_READER;
rear->r_proxy = B_TRUE;
rear->r_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
rear->r_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
front = zfs_range_proxify(tree, rl);
front->r_len = off - rl->r_off;
avl_insert_here(tree, rear, front, AVL_AFTER);
return (front);
}
/*
* Create and add a new proxy range lock for the supplied range.
*/
static void
zfs_range_new_proxy(avl_tree_t *tree, uint64_t off, uint64_t len)
{
rl_t *rl;
ASSERT(len);
rl = kmem_alloc(sizeof (rl_t), KM_SLEEP);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
rl->r_off = off;
rl->r_len = len;
rl->r_cnt = 1;
rl->r_type = RL_READER;
rl->r_proxy = B_TRUE;
rl->r_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
rl->r_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
avl_add(tree, rl);
}
static void
zfs_range_add_reader(avl_tree_t *tree, rl_t *new, rl_t *prev, avl_index_t where)
{
rl_t *next;
uint64_t off = new->r_off;
uint64_t len = new->r_len;
/*
* prev arrives either:
* - pointing to an entry at the same offset
* - pointing to the entry with the closest previous offset whose
* range may overlap with the new range
* - null, if there were no ranges starting before the new one
*/
if (prev) {
if (prev->r_off + prev->r_len <= off) {
prev = NULL;
} else if (prev->r_off != off) {
/*
* convert to proxy if needed then
* split this entry and bump ref count
*/
prev = zfs_range_split(tree, prev, off);
prev = AVL_NEXT(tree, prev); /* move to rear range */
}
}
ASSERT((prev == NULL) || (prev->r_off == off));
if (prev)
next = prev;
else
next = (rl_t *)avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
if (next == NULL || off + len <= next->r_off) {
/* no overlaps, use the original new rl_t in the tree */
avl_insert(tree, new, where);
return;
}
if (off < next->r_off) {
/* Add a proxy for initial range before the overlap */
zfs_range_new_proxy(tree, off, next->r_off - off);
}
new->r_cnt = 0; /* will use proxies in tree */
/*
* We now search forward through the ranges, until we go past the end
* of the new range. For each entry we make it a proxy if it
* isn't already, then bump its reference count. If there's any
* gaps between the ranges then we create a new proxy range.
*/
for (prev = NULL; next; prev = next, next = AVL_NEXT(tree, next)) {
if (off + len <= next->r_off)
break;
if (prev && prev->r_off + prev->r_len < next->r_off) {
/* there's a gap */
ASSERT3U(next->r_off, >, prev->r_off + prev->r_len);
zfs_range_new_proxy(tree, prev->r_off + prev->r_len,
next->r_off - (prev->r_off + prev->r_len));
}
if (off + len == next->r_off + next->r_len) {
/* exact overlap with end */
next = zfs_range_proxify(tree, next);
next->r_cnt++;
return;
}
if (off + len < next->r_off + next->r_len) {
/* new range ends in the middle of this block */
next = zfs_range_split(tree, next, off + len);
next->r_cnt++;
return;
}
ASSERT3U(off + len, >, next->r_off + next->r_len);
next = zfs_range_proxify(tree, next);
next->r_cnt++;
}
/* Add the remaining end range. */
zfs_range_new_proxy(tree, prev->r_off + prev->r_len,
(off + len) - (prev->r_off + prev->r_len));
}
/*
* Check if a reader lock can be grabbed, or wait and recheck until available.
*/
static void
zfs_range_lock_reader(zfs_rlock_t *zrl, rl_t *new)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
avl_tree_t *tree = &zrl->zr_avl;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
rl_t *prev, *next;
avl_index_t where;
uint64_t off = new->r_off;
uint64_t len = new->r_len;
/*
* Look for any writer locks in the range.
*/
retry:
prev = avl_find(tree, new, &where);
if (prev == NULL)
prev = (rl_t *)avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_BEFORE);
/*
* Check the previous range for a writer lock overlap.
*/
if (prev && (off < prev->r_off + prev->r_len)) {
if ((prev->r_type == RL_WRITER) || (prev->r_write_wanted)) {
if (!prev->r_read_wanted) {
cv_init(&prev->r_rd_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
prev->r_read_wanted = B_TRUE;
}
cv_wait(&prev->r_rd_cv, &zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
goto retry;
}
if (off + len < prev->r_off + prev->r_len)
goto got_lock;
}
/*
* Search through the following ranges to see if there's
* write lock any overlap.
*/
if (prev)
next = AVL_NEXT(tree, prev);
else
next = (rl_t *)avl_nearest(tree, where, AVL_AFTER);
for (; next; next = AVL_NEXT(tree, next)) {
if (off + len <= next->r_off)
goto got_lock;
if ((next->r_type == RL_WRITER) || (next->r_write_wanted)) {
if (!next->r_read_wanted) {
cv_init(&next->r_rd_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
next->r_read_wanted = B_TRUE;
}
cv_wait(&next->r_rd_cv, &zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
goto retry;
}
if (off + len <= next->r_off + next->r_len)
goto got_lock;
}
got_lock:
/*
* Add the read lock, which may involve splitting existing
* locks and bumping ref counts (r_cnt).
*/
zfs_range_add_reader(tree, new, prev, where);
}
/*
* Lock a range (offset, length) as either shared (RL_READER)
* or exclusive (RL_WRITER). Returns the range lock structure
* for later unlocking or reduce range (if entire file
* previously locked as RL_WRITER).
*/
rl_t *
zfs_range_lock(zfs_rlock_t *zrl, uint64_t off, uint64_t len, rl_type_t type)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
rl_t *new;
ASSERT(type == RL_READER || type == RL_WRITER || type == RL_APPEND);
new = kmem_alloc(sizeof (rl_t), KM_SLEEP);
new->r_zrl = zrl;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
new->r_off = off;
2009-02-18 20:51:31 +00:00
if (len + off < off) /* overflow */
len = UINT64_MAX - off;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
new->r_len = len;
new->r_cnt = 1; /* assume it's going to be in the tree */
new->r_type = type;
new->r_proxy = B_FALSE;
new->r_write_wanted = B_FALSE;
new->r_read_wanted = B_FALSE;
mutex_enter(&zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (type == RL_READER) {
/*
* First check for the usual case of no locks
*/
if (avl_numnodes(&zrl->zr_avl) == 0)
avl_add(&zrl->zr_avl, new);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
else
zfs_range_lock_reader(zrl, new);
} else /* RL_WRITER or RL_APPEND */
zfs_range_lock_writer(zrl, new);
mutex_exit(&zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
return (new);
}
static void
zfs_range_free(void *arg)
{
rl_t *rl = arg;
if (rl->r_write_wanted)
cv_destroy(&rl->r_wr_cv);
if (rl->r_read_wanted)
cv_destroy(&rl->r_rd_cv);
kmem_free(rl, sizeof (rl_t));
}
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Unlock a reader lock
*/
static void
zfs_range_unlock_reader(zfs_rlock_t *zrl, rl_t *remove, list_t *free_list)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
{
avl_tree_t *tree = &zrl->zr_avl;
rl_t *rl, *next = NULL;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
uint64_t len;
/*
* The common case is when the remove entry is in the tree
* (cnt == 1) meaning there's been no other reader locks overlapping
* with this one. Otherwise the remove entry will have been
* removed from the tree and replaced by proxies (one or
* more ranges mapping to the entire range).
*/
if (remove->r_cnt == 1) {
avl_remove(tree, remove);
if (remove->r_write_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&remove->r_wr_cv);
if (remove->r_read_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&remove->r_rd_cv);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 20:17:35 +00:00
list_insert_tail(free_list, remove);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
} else {
ASSERT0(remove->r_cnt);
ASSERT0(remove->r_write_wanted);
ASSERT0(remove->r_read_wanted);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/*
* Find start proxy representing this reader lock,
* then decrement ref count on all proxies
* that make up this range, freeing them as needed.
*/
rl = avl_find(tree, remove, NULL);
ASSERT(rl);
ASSERT(rl->r_cnt);
ASSERT(rl->r_type == RL_READER);
for (len = remove->r_len; len != 0; rl = next) {
len -= rl->r_len;
if (len) {
next = AVL_NEXT(tree, rl);
ASSERT(next);
ASSERT(rl->r_off + rl->r_len == next->r_off);
ASSERT(next->r_cnt);
ASSERT(next->r_type == RL_READER);
}
rl->r_cnt--;
if (rl->r_cnt == 0) {
avl_remove(tree, rl);
if (rl->r_write_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_wr_cv);
if (rl->r_read_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_rd_cv);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 20:17:35 +00:00
list_insert_tail(free_list, rl);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
}
kmem_free(remove, sizeof (rl_t));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
}
/*
* Unlock range and destroy range lock structure.
*/
void
zfs_range_unlock(rl_t *rl)
{
zfs_rlock_t *zrl = rl->r_zrl;
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 20:17:35 +00:00
list_t free_list;
rl_t *free_rl;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
ASSERT(rl->r_type == RL_WRITER || rl->r_type == RL_READER);
ASSERT(rl->r_cnt == 1 || rl->r_cnt == 0);
ASSERT(!rl->r_proxy);
list_create(&free_list, sizeof (rl_t), offsetof(rl_t, rl_node));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
mutex_enter(&zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (rl->r_type == RL_WRITER) {
/* writer locks can't be shared or split */
avl_remove(&zrl->zr_avl, rl);
if (rl->r_write_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_wr_cv);
if (rl->r_read_wanted)
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_rd_cv);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 20:17:35 +00:00
list_insert_tail(&free_list, rl);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
} else {
/*
* lock may be shared, let zfs_range_unlock_reader()
* release the zp->z_range_lock lock and free the rl_t
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
*/
zfs_range_unlock_reader(zrl, rl, &free_list);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
mutex_exit(&zrl->zr_mutex);
Range lock performance improvements The original range lock implementation had to be modified by commit 8926ab7 because it was unsafe on Linux. In particular, calling cv_destroy() immediately after cv_broadcast() is dangerous because the waiters may still be asleep. Thus the following cv_destroy() will free memory which may still be in use. This was fixed by updating cv_destroy() to block on waiters but this in turn introduced a deadlock. The deadlock was resolved with the use of a taskq to move the offending free outside the range lock. This worked well but using the taskq for the free resulted in a serious performace hit. This is somewhat ironic because at the time I felt using the taskq might improve things by making the free asynchronous. This patch refines the original fix and moves the free from the taskq to a private free list. Then items which must be free'd are simply inserted in to the list. When the range lock is dropped it's safe to free the items. The list is walked and all rl_t entries are freed. This change improves small cached read performance by 26x. This was expected because for small reads the number of locking calls goes up significantly. More surprisingly this change significantly improves large cache read performance. This probably attributable to better cpu/memory locality. Very likely the same processor which allocated the memory is now freeing it. bs ext3 zfs zfs+fix faster ---------------------------------------------- 512 435 3 79 26x 1k 820 7 160 22x 2k 1536 14 305 21x 4k 2764 28 572 20x 8k 3788 50 1024 20x 16k 4300 86 1843 21x 32k 4505 138 2560 18x 64k 5324 252 3891 15x 128k 5427 276 4710 17x 256k 5427 413 5017 12x 512k 5427 497 5324 10x 1m 5427 521 5632 10x Closes #142
2011-03-08 20:17:35 +00:00
while ((free_rl = list_head(&free_list)) != NULL) {
list_remove(&free_list, free_rl);
zfs_range_free(free_rl);
}
list_destroy(&free_list);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
/*
* Reduce range locked as RL_WRITER from whole file to specified range.
* Asserts the whole file is exclusivly locked and so there's only one
* entry in the tree.
*/
void
zfs_range_reduce(rl_t *rl, uint64_t off, uint64_t len)
{
zfs_rlock_t *zrl = rl->r_zrl;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
/* Ensure there are no other locks */
ASSERT(avl_numnodes(&zrl->zr_avl) == 1);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
ASSERT(rl->r_off == 0);
ASSERT(rl->r_type == RL_WRITER);
ASSERT(!rl->r_proxy);
ASSERT3U(rl->r_len, ==, UINT64_MAX);
ASSERT3U(rl->r_cnt, ==, 1);
mutex_enter(&zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
rl->r_off = off;
rl->r_len = len;
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
if (rl->r_write_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_wr_cv);
if (rl->r_read_wanted)
cv_broadcast(&rl->r_rd_cv);
mutex_exit(&zrl->zr_mutex);
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
/*
* AVL comparison function used to order range locks
* Locks are ordered on the start offset of the range.
*/
int
zfs_range_compare(const void *arg1, const void *arg2)
{
Performance optimization of AVL tree comparator functions perf: 2.75x faster ddt_entry_compare() First 256bits of ddt_key_t is a block checksum, which are expected to be close to random data. Hence, on average, comparison only needs to look at first few bytes of the keys. To reduce number of conditional jump instructions, the result is computed as: sign(memcmp(k1, k2)). Sign of an integer 'a' can be obtained as: `(0 < a) - (a < 0)` := {-1, 0, 1} , which is computed efficiently. Synthetic performance evaluation of original and new algorithm over 1G random keys on 2.6GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3: old 6.85789 s new 2.49089 s perf: 2.8x faster vdev_queue_offset_compare() and vdev_queue_timestamp_compare() Compute the result directly instead of using conditionals perf: zfs_range_compare() Speedup between 1.1x - 2.5x, depending on compiler version and optimization level. perf: spa_error_entry_compare() `bcmp()` is not suitable for comparator use. Use `memcmp()` instead. perf: 2.8x faster metaslab_compare() and metaslab_rangesize_compare() perf: 2.8x faster zil_bp_compare() perf: 2.8x faster mze_compare() perf: faster dbuf_compare() perf: faster compares in spa_misc perf: 2.8x faster layout_hash_compare() perf: 2.8x faster space_reftree_compare() perf: libzfs: faster avl tree comparators perf: guid_compare() perf: dsl_deadlist_compare() perf: perm_set_compare() perf: 2x faster range_tree_seg_compare() perf: faster unique_compare() perf: faster vdev_cache _compare() perf: faster vdev_uberblock_compare() perf: faster fuid _compare() perf: faster zfs_znode_hold_compare() Signed-off-by: Gvozden Neskovic <neskovic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Elling <richard.elling@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Closes #5033
2016-08-27 18:12:53 +00:00
const rl_t *rl1 = (const rl_t *)arg1;
const rl_t *rl2 = (const rl_t *)arg2;
return (AVL_CMP(rl1->r_off, rl2->r_off));
2008-11-20 20:01:55 +00:00
}
#ifdef _KERNEL
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_range_lock);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_range_unlock);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_range_reduce);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(zfs_range_compare);
#endif