1994-05-30 19:09:18 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
|
|
|
|
.\" All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
.\" are met:
|
|
|
|
.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
|
|
|
|
.\" must display the following acknowledgement:
|
|
|
|
.\" This product includes software developed by the University of
|
|
|
|
.\" California, Berkeley and its contributors.
|
|
|
|
.\" 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
|
|
|
|
.\" may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
|
|
|
|
.\" without specific prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" @(#)motivation.ms 6.2 (Berkeley) 4/16/91
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
2003-01-01 18:49:04 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
1994-05-30 19:09:18 +00:00
|
|
|
.ds RH Motivation
|
|
|
|
.NH
|
|
|
|
Motivation
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
These benchmarks were performed for several reasons.
|
|
|
|
Foremost was our desire to obtain guideline to aid
|
|
|
|
in choosing one the most expensive components of any
|
|
|
|
VAX UNIX configuration, the disk storage system.
|
|
|
|
The range of choices in this area has increased dramatically
|
|
|
|
in the last year.
|
|
|
|
DEC has become, with the introduction of the UDA50/RA81 system,
|
|
|
|
cost competitive
|
|
|
|
in the area of disk storage for the first time.
|
|
|
|
Emulex's entry into the VAX 11/780 SBI controller
|
2003-01-01 18:49:04 +00:00
|
|
|
field, the SC780, represented an important choice for us to examine, given
|
1994-05-30 19:09:18 +00:00
|
|
|
our previous success with their VAX 11/750 SC750 controller and
|
|
|
|
their UNIBUS controllers.
|
|
|
|
The Fujitsu 2351A
|
|
|
|
Winchester disk drive represents the lowest cost-per-byte disk storage
|
|
|
|
known to us.
|
|
|
|
In addition, Fujitsu's reputation for reliability was appealing.
|
|
|
|
The many attractive aspects of these components justified a more
|
|
|
|
careful examination of their performance aspects under UNIX.
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
In addition to the direct motivation of developing an effective
|
|
|
|
choice of storage systems, we hoped to gain more insight into
|
|
|
|
VAX UNIX file system and I/O performance in general.
|
|
|
|
What generic characteristics of I/O subsystems are most
|
|
|
|
important?
|
|
|
|
How important is the location of the controller on the SBI/CMI versus
|
|
|
|
the UNIBUS?
|
|
|
|
Is extensive buffering in the controller essential or even important?
|
|
|
|
How much can be gained by putting more of the storage system
|
|
|
|
management and optimization function in the controller as
|
|
|
|
DEC does with the UDA50?
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
We also wanted to resolve particular speculation about the value of
|
|
|
|
storage system optimization by a controller in a UNIX
|
|
|
|
environment.
|
|
|
|
Is the access optimization as effective as that already provided
|
|
|
|
by the existing 4.2BSD UNIX device handlers for traditional disks?
|
|
|
|
VMS disk handlers do no seek optimization.
|
|
|
|
This gives the UDA50 controller an advantage over other controllers
|
|
|
|
under VMS which is not likely to be as important to UNIX.
|
|
|
|
Are there penalties associated with greater intelligence in the controller?
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
A third and last reason for evaluating this equipment is comparable
|
|
|
|
to the proverbial mountain climbers answer when asked why he climbs
|
|
|
|
a particular mountain,
|
|
|
|
``It was there.''
|
|
|
|
In our case the equipment
|
|
|
|
was there.
|
|
|
|
We were lucky enough to assemble all the desired disks and controllers
|
|
|
|
and get them installed on a temporarily idle VAX 11/780.
|
|
|
|
This got us started collecting data.
|
|
|
|
Although many of the tests were later rerun on a variety of other systems,
|
|
|
|
this initial test bed was essential for working out the testing bugs
|
|
|
|
and getting our feet wet.
|
|
|
|
.ds RH Equipment
|
|
|
|
.bp
|