Improve EPOCH_TRACE

Two changes to EPOCH_TRACE:
(1) add a sysctl to surpress the backtrace from epoch_trace_report().
    Sometimes the log line for the recursion is enough and the
    backtrace massively spams the console.
(2) In order to be able to go without the backtrace do not only
    print where the previous occurance happened, but also where
    the current one happens.  That way we have file:line information
    for both and can look at them without the need for getting line
    numbers from backtrace and a debugging tool.

Reviewed by:	glebius
Sponsored by:	Netflix (originally)
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22641
This commit is contained in:
Bjoern A. Zeeb 2019-12-06 16:34:04 +00:00
parent 0a833dff03
commit 173c062a56
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=355448

View File

@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ RB_GENERATE_STATIC(stacktree, stackentry, se_node, stackentry_compare);
static struct mtx epoch_stacks_lock;
MTX_SYSINIT(epochstacks, &epoch_stacks_lock, "epoch_stacks", MTX_DEF);
static bool epoch_trace_stack_print = true;
SYSCTL_BOOL(_kern_epoch, OID_AUTO, trace_stack_print, CTLFLAG_RWTUN,
&epoch_trace_stack_print, 0, "Print stack traces on epoch reports");
static void epoch_trace_report(const char *fmt, ...) __printflike(1, 2);
static inline void
epoch_trace_report(const char *fmt, ...)
@ -197,7 +201,8 @@ epoch_trace_report(const char *fmt, ...)
va_start(ap, fmt);
(void)vprintf(fmt, ap);
va_end(ap);
stack_print_ddb(&se.se_stack);
if (epoch_trace_stack_print)
stack_print_ddb(&se.se_stack);
}
static inline void
@ -209,8 +214,9 @@ epoch_trace_enter(struct thread *td, epoch_t epoch, epoch_tracker_t et,
SLIST_FOREACH(iet, &td->td_epochs, et_tlink)
if (iet->et_epoch == epoch)
epoch_trace_report("Recursively entering epoch %s "
"previously entered at %s:%d\n",
epoch->e_name, iet->et_file, iet->et_line);
"at %s:%d, previously entered at %s:%d\n",
epoch->e_name, file, line,
iet->et_file, iet->et_line);
et->et_epoch = epoch;
et->et_file = file;
et->et_line = line;
@ -223,9 +229,10 @@ epoch_trace_exit(struct thread *td, epoch_t epoch, epoch_tracker_t et,
{
if (SLIST_FIRST(&td->td_epochs) != et) {
epoch_trace_report("Exiting epoch %s in a not nested order. "
"Most recently entered %s at %s:%d\n",
epoch_trace_report("Exiting epoch %s in a not nested order "
"at %s:%d. Most recently entered %s at %s:%d\n",
epoch->e_name,
file, line,
SLIST_FIRST(&td->td_epochs)->et_epoch->e_name,
SLIST_FIRST(&td->td_epochs)->et_file,
SLIST_FIRST(&td->td_epochs)->et_line);