snmp_pdu_free the right object at the right time in snmptool_walk

r310892 was on the right track, but unfortunately it was resolving
the problem incorrectly and accidentally leaking memory in the
process.

- Call snmp_pdu_free on req before calling snmp_pdu_create on it
  at the bottom of the outer while loop
- Call snmp_pdu_free on resp after calling snmpwalk_nextpdu_create
  in the inner loop

MFC after:	12 days
X-MFC with:	r310729, r310892
Reported by:	valgrind
This commit is contained in:
Enji Cooper 2016-12-31 10:01:25 +00:00
parent 00f6082b98
commit 1b135e4f47
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=310894

View File

@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ snmptool_get(struct snmp_toolinfo *snmptoolctx)
snmp_pdu_create(&req, GET_PDUTYPE(snmptoolctx));
}
snmp_pdu_free(&req);
snmp_pdu_free(&resp);
return (0);
@ -507,6 +508,7 @@ snmptool_walk(struct snmp_toolinfo *snmptoolctx)
if (op == SNMP_PDU_GETBULK)
snmpget_fix_getbulk(&req, GET_MAXREP(snmptoolctx),
GET_NONREP(snmptoolctx));
snmp_pdu_free(&resp);
}
/* Just in case our root was a leaf. */
@ -517,6 +519,7 @@ snmptool_walk(struct snmp_toolinfo *snmptoolctx)
snmp_output_err_resp(snmptoolctx, &resp);
else
snmp_output_resp(snmptoolctx, &(resp), NULL);
snmp_pdu_free(&resp);
} else
warn("Snmp dialog");
}
@ -526,11 +529,13 @@ snmptool_walk(struct snmp_toolinfo *snmptoolctx)
break;
}
snmp_pdu_free(&resp);
snmp_pdu_free(&req);
snmp_pdu_create(&req, op);
}
snmp_pdu_free(&req);
snmp_pdu_free(&resp);
if (rc == 0)
return (0);
else