Use MUTEX_FSTRANS mutex type

There are regions in the ZFS code where it is desirable to be able
to be set PF_FSTRANS while a specific mutex is held.  The ZFS code
could be updated to set/clear this flag in all the correct places,
but this is undesirable for a few reasons.

1) It would require changes to a significant amount of the ZFS
   code.  This would complicate applying patches from upstream.

2) It would be easy to accidentally miss a critical region in
   the initial patch or to have an future change introduce a
   new one.

Both of these concerns can be addressed by using a new mutex type
which is responsible for managing PF_FSTRANS, support for which was
added to the SPL in commit zfsonlinux/spl@9099312 - Merge branch
'kmem-rework'.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com>
Closes #3050
Closes #3055
Closes #3062
Closes #3132
Closes #3142
Closes #2983
This commit is contained in:
Brian Behlendorf 2015-02-26 15:29:33 -08:00
parent d14cfd83da
commit 4ec15b8dcf
3 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ typedef struct kmutex {
} kmutex_t;
#define MUTEX_DEFAULT 0
#define MUTEX_FSTRANS MUTEX_DEFAULT
#define MUTEX_HELD(m) ((m)->m_owner == curthread)
#define MUTEX_NOT_HELD(m) (!MUTEX_HELD(m))

View File

@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ buf_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < BUF_LOCKS; i++) {
mutex_init(&buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock,
NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
NULL, MUTEX_FSTRANS, NULL);
}
}

View File

@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ dbuf_init(void)
0, dbuf_cons, dbuf_dest, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
for (i = 0; i < DBUF_MUTEXES; i++)
mutex_init(&h->hash_mutexes[i], NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
mutex_init(&h->hash_mutexes[i], NULL, MUTEX_FSTRANS, NULL);
dbuf_stats_init(h);
}