Previously I thought I was seeing a failure to install the .5 man pages

with this configuration, but Ruslan tells me that I was probably mistaken,
and on retest the .5 pages are being installed just fine.

Therefore reverse the MAN[58] change in favor of the more modern syntax.

Submitted by:	ru
This commit is contained in:
dougb 2004-09-27 03:55:03 +00:00
parent c34e2bc5a8
commit 5ada46646f
2 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ CFLAGS+= -I${SRCDIR}/unix/include -I${SRCDIR}/include -I${LIB_BIND_DIR}
DPADD+= ${BIND_DPADD} ${CRYPTO_DPADD} ${PTHREAD_DPADD}
LDADD+= ${BIND_LDADD} ${CRYPTO_LDADD} ${PTHREAD_LDADD}
MAN5= named.conf.5
MAN8= named.8 lwresd.8
MAN= named.8 lwresd.8 named.conf.5
MANFILTER= sed -e "s@/etc/named\.conf@/etc/namedb/named.conf@g"

View File

@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ CFLAGS+= -I${SRCDIR}/unix/include -I${SRCDIR}/include -I${LIB_BIND_DIR}
DPADD+= ${BIND_DPADD} ${CRYPTO_DPADD} ${PTHREAD_DPADD}
LDADD+= ${BIND_LDADD} ${CRYPTO_LDADD} ${PTHREAD_LDADD}
MAN5= rndc.conf.5
MAN8= rndc.8
MAN= rndc.8 rndc.conf.5
MANFILTER= sed -e "s@/etc/rndc\.conf@/etc/namedb/rndc.conf@g" \
-e "s@/etc/rndc\.key@/etc/namedb/rndc.key@g"