Back this change out. It's just not worth arguing over and any further emails

I get on this topic will go straight to /dev/null.  This is absolutely the
last word on this topic you'll see from me.  Too much time has already been
wasted.

libexec/getty/gettytab.5

@@ -220,15 +220,10 @@ and
 .Em \&lm
 may include the character sequence
 .Em \&%h
-to include the hostname,
+or
 .Em \&%t
-to obtain the tty name,
-.Em \&%s
-to obtain the OS type (FreeBSD),
-.Em \&%r
-to obtain the OS release string or
-.Em \&%m
-to obtain the machine architecture type.
+to obtain
+the hostname or tty name respectively.
 .Pf ( Em %%
 obtains a single '%' character.)
 The hostname is normally obtained from the system,

libexec/getty/main.c

@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static char sccsid[] = "@(#)main.c	5.16 (Berkeley) 3/27/91";
 #include <ctype.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
-#include <sys/utsname.h>
 #include "gettytab.h"
 #include "pathnames.h"
 
@@ -455,7 +454,6 @@ putf(cp)
 			break;
 
 		case 'h':
-		case 'n':
 			puts(editedhost);
 			break;
 
@@ -466,32 +464,8 @@ putf(cp)
 			(void)time(&t);
 			(void)strftime(db, sizeof(db), fmt, localtime(&t));
 			puts(db);
+			break;
 		}
-		break;
-
-		case 's': {
-			struct utsname name;
-
-			if (uname(&name) != -1)
-			    puts(name.sysname);
-		}
-		break;
-
-		case 'r': {
-			struct utsname name;
-
-			if (uname(&name) != -1)
-			    puts(name.release);
-		}
-		break;
-
-		case 'm': {
-			struct utsname name;
-
-			if (uname(&name) != -1)
-			    puts(name.machine);
-		}
-		break;
 
 		case '%':
 			putchr('%');