I asked Bosko Milekic for help with 'peak' reporting, and he suggested

using the old 'cached' value but reporting it as 'cached'.

I've decided to report the 'cached' as 'peak', why?  Well because
it is the peak, the peak of what is actually allocated.  'cached'
doesn't make sense to me as a user.
This commit is contained in:
Alfred Perlstein 2003-12-23 14:06:24 +00:00
parent 1805ed0772
commit 7a744a48d2
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=123767

View File

@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ mbpr(u_long mbaddr, u_long mbtaddr __unused, u_long nmbcaddr, u_long nmbufaddr,
} else {
/* XXX: peak is now wrong. */
printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n",
totused[0], totused[0], nmbufs);
totused[0], totnum, nmbufs);
}
for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) {
@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ mbpr(u_long mbaddr, u_long mbtaddr __unused, u_long nmbcaddr, u_long nmbufaddr,
} else {
/* XXX: peak is now wrong. */
printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n",
totused[1], totused[1], nmbclusters);
totused[1], totnum, nmbclusters);
}
for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) {
if (mbpstat[i]->mb_active == 0)