Fix the incremental priority increment.

PR: bin/6467 Marino Ladavac <lada@pc8811.gud.siemens.at>
This commit is contained in:
John Birrell 1998-04-30 21:50:29 +00:00
parent ce42f1fb17
commit 96efcebdfc
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=35564
3 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.9 1998/04/17 09:37:41 jb Exp $
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.10 1998/04/29 09:59:02 jb Exp $
*
*/
#include <errno.h>
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ __asm__("fnsave %0": :"m"(*fdata));
* the last incremental priority check was
* made:
*/
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, >)) {
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, <)) {
/*
* Increment the incremental priority
* for this thread in the hope that

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.9 1998/04/17 09:37:41 jb Exp $
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.10 1998/04/29 09:59:02 jb Exp $
*
*/
#include <errno.h>
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ __asm__("fnsave %0": :"m"(*fdata));
* the last incremental priority check was
* made:
*/
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, >)) {
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, <)) {
/*
* Increment the incremental priority
* for this thread in the hope that

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.9 1998/04/17 09:37:41 jb Exp $
* $Id: uthread_kern.c,v 1.10 1998/04/29 09:59:02 jb Exp $
*
*/
#include <errno.h>
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ __asm__("fnsave %0": :"m"(*fdata));
* the last incremental priority check was
* made:
*/
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, >)) {
else if (timercmp(&_thread_run->last_inactive, &kern_inc_prio_time, <)) {
/*
* Increment the incremental priority
* for this thread in the hope that