From a918f16a9470ff835e10b2ab7a944db3e04efa25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:51:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Defining usage() "__dead" is just ridiculous.  It also won't
 compile with a June 2000 GCC 2.96 snapshot.

Reviewed by:	bde
---
 contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c b/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c
index a733a8a463a1..0eb11d0d3c2b 100644
--- a/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c
+++ b/contrib/traceroute/traceroute.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ int	setpolicy __P((int so, char *policy));
 #endif
 void	send_probe(int, int);
 void	tvsub(struct timeval *, struct timeval *);
-__dead	void usage(void);
+void usage(void);
 int	wait_for_reply(int, struct sockaddr_in *, struct timeval *);
 
 void	udp_prep(struct outdata *);
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ savestr(register const char *str)
 	return (cp);
 }
 
-__dead void
+void
 usage(void)
 {
 	extern char version[];