Improve meta data performance

Profiling the system during meta data intensive workloads such
as creating/removing millions of files, revealed that the system
was cpu bound.  A large fraction of that cpu time was being spent
waiting on the virtual address space spin lock.

It turns out this was caused by certain heavily used kmem_caches
being backed by virtual memory.  By default a kmem_cache will
dynamically determine the type of memory used based on the object
size.  For large objects virtual memory is usually preferable
and for small object physical memory is a better choice.  See
the spl_slab_alloc() function for a longer discussion on this.

However, there is a certain amount of gray area when defining a
'large' object.  For the following caches it turns out they were
just over the line:

  * dnode_cache
  * zio_cache
  * zio_link_cache
  * zio_buf_512_cache
  * zfs_data_buf_512_cache

Now because we know there will be a lot of churn in these caches,
and because we know the slabs will still be reasonably sized.
We can safely request with the KMC_KMEM flag that the caches be
backed with physical memory addresses.  This entirely avoids the
need to serialize on the virtual address space lock.

As a bonus this also reduces our vmalloc usage which will be good
for 32-bit kernels which have a very small virtual address space.
It will also probably be good for interactive performance since
unrelated processes could also block of this same global lock.
Finally, we may see less cpu time being burned in the arc_reclaim
and txg_sync_threads.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Issue #258

include/sys/zfs_context.h

@@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ extern void kstat_delete(kstat_t *);
 #define	KM_NOSLEEP		UMEM_DEFAULT
 #define	KM_NODEBUG		0x0
 #define	KMC_NODEBUG		UMC_NODEBUG
+#define	KMC_KMEM		0x0
+#define	KMC_VMEM		0x0
 #define	kmem_alloc(_s, _f)	umem_alloc(_s, _f)
 #define	kmem_zalloc(_s, _f)	umem_zalloc(_s, _f)
 #define	kmem_free(_b, _s)	umem_free(_b, _s)

module/zfs/dnode.c

@@ -171,9 +171,8 @@ void
 dnode_init(void)
 {
 	ASSERT(dnode_cache == NULL);
-	dnode_cache = kmem_cache_create("dnode_t",
-	    sizeof (dnode_t),
-	    0, dnode_cons, dnode_dest, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
+	dnode_cache = kmem_cache_create("dnode_t", sizeof (dnode_t),
+	    0, dnode_cons, dnode_dest, NULL, NULL, NULL, KMC_KMEM);
 	kmem_cache_set_move(dnode_cache, dnode_move);
 }
 

module/zfs/zio.c

@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ zio_init(void)
 	data_alloc_arena = zio_alloc_arena;
 #endif
 	zio_cache = kmem_cache_create("zio_cache",
-	    sizeof (zio_t), 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
+	    sizeof (zio_t), 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, KMC_KMEM);
 	zio_link_cache = kmem_cache_create("zio_link_cache",
-	    sizeof (zio_link_t), 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
+	    sizeof (zio_link_t), 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, KMC_KMEM);
 
 	/*
 	 * For small buffers, we want a cache for each multiple of
@@ -136,17 +136,27 @@ zio_init(void)
 
 		if (align != 0) {
 			char name[36];
+			int flags = zio_bulk_flags;
+
+			/*
+			 * The smallest buffers (512b) are heavily used and
+			 * experience a lot of churn.  The slabs allocated
+			 * for them are also relatively small (32K).  Thus
+			 * in over to avoid expensive calls to vmalloc() we
+			 * make an exception to the usual slab allocation
+			 * policy and force these buffers to be kmem backed.
+			 */
+			if (size == (1 << SPA_MINBLOCKSHIFT))
+				flags |= KMC_KMEM;
+
 			(void) sprintf(name, "zio_buf_%lu", (ulong_t)size);
 			zio_buf_cache[c] = kmem_cache_create(name, size,
-			    align, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
-			    (size > zio_buf_debug_limit ? KMC_NODEBUG : 0) |
-			    zio_bulk_flags);
+			    align, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, flags);
 
 			(void) sprintf(name, "zio_data_buf_%lu", (ulong_t)size);
 			zio_data_buf_cache[c] = kmem_cache_create(name, size,
-			    align, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, data_alloc_arena,
-			    (size > zio_buf_debug_limit ? KMC_NODEBUG : 0) |
-			    zio_bulk_flags);
+			    align, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+			    data_alloc_arena, flags);
 		}
 	}