This mutes warnings with clang
Approved by: rpaulo (mentor)
Reviewed by: das, kargl (both as part of a larger patch)
Phabric: D742
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
long double versions don't pass yet. (They are rather nit-picky cases,
so there's ongoing discussion with Bruce about whether it is worth the
performance cost.)
because different tests have different ideas about what it means to be
"close enough" to the right answer, depending on the properties of the
function being tested. In the process, I fixed some warnings and
added a few more 'volatile' hacks, which are sufficient to make all
the tests pass at -O2 with clang.
result depend on the cosine and sine of the imaginary part.
Small values are used in the new tests such that cosine and sine are well
defined.
Reviewed by: das
are workarounds for various symptoms of the problem described in clang
bugs 3929, 8100, 8241, 10409, and 12958.
The regression tests did their job: they failed, someone brought it
up on the mailing lists, and then the issue got ignored for 6 months.
Oops. There may still be some regressions for functions we don't have
test coverage for yet.
I wrote these to test amd64 asm functions that used
maxss, maxsd, minss, and minsd, but it turns out that
those instructions don't handle NaNs and signed zero
in the same way as fmin() and fmax() are required to,
so we're stuck with the C versions for now.
mostly just test corner cases rather than accuracy. Some of the
tests don't pass right now if you compile libm at -O2 due to gcc
constant-folding some things that it shouldn't. I'll fix that
shortly.
understood by Perl's Test::Harness module and prove(1) commands.
Update README to describe the new protocol. The work's broken down into
two main sets of changes.
First, update the existing test programs (shell scripts and C programs)
to produce output in the ok/not ok format, and to, where possible, also
produce a header describing the number of tests that are expected to be
run.
Second, provide the .t files that actually run the tests. In some cases
these are copies of, or very similar too, scripts that already existed.
I've kept the old scripts around so that it's possible to verify that
behaviour under this new system (in terms of whether or not a test fails)
is identical to the behaviour under the old system.
Add a TODO file.
