On some architectures, u_long isn't large enough for resource definitions.
Particularly, powerpc and arm allow 36-bit (or larger) physical addresses, but
type `long' is only 32-bit. This extends rman's resources to uintmax_t. With
this change, any resource can feasibly be placed anywhere in physical memory
(within the constraints of the driver).
Why uintmax_t and not something machine dependent, or uint64_t? Though it's
possible for uintmax_t to grow, it's highly unlikely it will become 128-bit on
32-bit architectures. 64-bit architectures should have plenty of RAM to absorb
the increase on resource sizes if and when this occurs, and the number of
resources on memory-constrained systems should be sufficiently small as to not
pose a drastic overhead. That being said, uintmax_t was chosen for source
clarity. If it's specified as uint64_t, all printf()-like calls would either
need casts to uintmax_t, or be littered with PRI*64 macros. Casts to uintmax_t
aren't horrible, but it would also bake into the API for
resource_list_print_type() either a hidden assumption that entries get cast to
uintmax_t for printing, or these calls would need the PRI*64 macros. Since
source code is meant to be read more often than written, I chose the clearest
path of simply using uintmax_t.
Tested on a PowerPC p5020-based board, which places all device resources in
0xfxxxxxxxx, and has 8GB RAM.
Regression tested on qemu-system-i386
Regression tested on qemu-system-mips (malta profile)
Tested PAE and devinfo on virtualbox (live CD)
Special thanks to bz for his testing on ARM.
Reviewed By: bz, jhb (previous)
Relnotes: Yes
Sponsored by: Alex Perez/Inertial Computing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4544
Summary:
The idea behind this is '~0ul' is well-defined, and casting to uintmax_t, on a
32-bit platform, will leave the upper 32 bits as 0. The maximum range of a
resource is 0xFFF.... (all bits of the full type set). By dropping the 'ul'
suffix, C type promotion rules apply, and the sign extension of ~0 on 32 bit
platforms gets it to a type-independent 'unsigned max'.
Reviewed By: cem
Sponsored by: Alex Perez/Inertial Computing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5255
Most calls to bus_alloc_resource() use "anywhere" as the range, with a given
count. Migrate these to use the new bus_alloc_resource_anywhere() API.
Reviewed by: jhb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5370
This simplifies checking for default resource range for bus_alloc_resource(),
and improves readability.
This is part of, and related to, the migration of rman_res_t from u_long to
uintmax_t.
Discussed with: jhb
Suggested by: marcel
Summary:
Migrate to using the semi-opaque type rman_res_t to specify rman resources. For
now, this is still compatible with u_long.
This is step one in migrating rman to use uintmax_t for resources instead of
u_long.
Going forward, this could feasibly be used to specify architecture-specific
definitions of resource ranges, rather than baking a specific integer type into
the API.
This change has been broken out to facilitate MFC'ing drivers back to 10 without
breaking ABI.
Reviewed By: jhb
Sponsored by: Alex Perez/Inertial Computing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5075
block. Use it in all the PNP drivers to export either the current PNP
table. For uart, create a custom table and export it using
MODULE_PNP_INFO since it's the only one that matches on function
number.
Differential Review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3461
Always include the card human readable name. We support ~270 cards and
at ~20 bytes each, this bloats things by only ~5k. Retain the
PCMCIA_CARD vs PCMCIA_CARD_D distinction, though, in case this is
intolerable.
These changes prevent sysctl(8) from returning proper output,
such as:
1) no output from sysctl(8)
2) erroneously returning ENOMEM with tools like truss(1)
or uname(1)
truss: can not get etype: Cannot allocate memory
there is an environment variable which shall initialize the SYSCTL
during early boot. This works for all SYSCTL types both statically and
dynamically created ones, except for the SYSCTL NODE type and SYSCTLs
which belong to VNETs. A new flag, CTLFLAG_NOFETCH, has been added to
be used in the case a tunable sysctl has a custom initialisation
function allowing the sysctl to still be marked as a tunable. The
kernel SYSCTL API is mostly the same, with a few exceptions for some
special operations like iterating childrens of a static/extern SYSCTL
node. This operation should probably be made into a factored out
common macro, hence some device drivers use this. The reason for
changing the SYSCTL API was the need for a SYSCTL parent OID pointer
and not only the SYSCTL parent OID list pointer in order to quickly
generate the sysctl path. The motivation behind this patch is to avoid
parameter loading cludges inside the OFED driver subsystem. Instead of
adding special code to the OFED driver subsystem to post-load tunables
into dynamically created sysctls, we generalize this in the kernel.
Other changes:
- Corrected a possibly incorrect sysctl name from "hw.cbb.intr_mask"
to "hw.pcic.intr_mask".
- Removed redundant TUNABLE statements throughout the kernel.
- Some minor code rewrites in connection to removing not needed
TUNABLE statements.
- Added a missing SYSCTL_DECL().
- Wrapped two very long lines.
- Avoid malloc()/free() inside sysctl string handling, in case it is
called to initialize a sysctl from a tunable, hence malloc()/free() is
not ready when sysctls from the sysctl dataset are registered.
- Bumped FreeBSD version to indicate SYSCTL API change.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
If I interpret the C standard correctly, the storage specifier should be
placed before the inline keyword. While at it, replace __inline by
inline in the files affected.
The SYSCTL_NODE macro defines a list that stores all child-elements of
that node. If there's no SYSCTL_DECL macro anywhere else, there's no
reason why it shouldn't be static.
legal in the spec. Add newline to the verbose messages we print when
debugging when this happens. The Hitachi HT-4840-11 is the only card
to hit these in years, and it works well enough if we're liberal about
what we accept.
says that in such cases we can pick any interrupt. One of these cards
is the LG11 Wireless LAN card. I don't have one of these, but I do
know that this doesn't hurt any cards I've tried it with.
PR: 92070
Submitted by: Helge Oldach
MFC after: 3 days
procedure. There were some subtle differences before that could lead
to a variety of bugs, including resources being lost (in one case
forever). pccard_probe_and_attach_card does this now, and includes
comments about what's going on and why, since it isn't obvious from
the code. Please let me know if I've missed anything...
Provide a new function called pccard_select_cfe that allows drivers to
select which configuration entry to use. This is needed for some
older pre-MFC standard cards with many functions that want to activate
all their functions by selecting alternative entries, or to work
around broken ones. pccard_select_cfe will migrate into the
pccard_if.m interface as its interface stabilizes to keep all the
pccard drivers from referencing any symbols in the pccard.ko module
directly.
Fix a printf to refer to the right function name.
appropriate (versions not appropriate to merge omitted):
o 1.226 imp nop, save for NetBSD string (minor merging the other way)
o 1.225 jnemeth Coreage LAPCCTXD
o 1.224 martin (remove 3rd and 4th clauses)
o 1.223 kiyohara (TDK bluetooth PC Card)
o 1.222 kiyohara (Anycom BlueCard)
o 1.221 ichiro (NEC Infrontia AX420N)
o 1.219 jmcneill (EDIMAX EP-4101)
o 1.213 tsutsui (TEAC IDECARDII entry fix)
Also, while I'm here, fix some tab problems that have crept in.
