Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using misidentified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
prone - task.
The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
which was added by cognet in 2012, so remove the no-longer-applicable
license stuff that referred to all the old contents, and put in a
standard 2-clause BSD license (to cover the 6 lines of useful code left
in here).
swi_exit code in exception.S instead of having its own inline expansion
of the DO_AST and PULLFRAME macros. That means that now all references
to the PUSH/PULLFRAME and DO_AST macros are localized to exception.S,
so move the macros themselves into there and remove them from asmacros.h
the old way was to store pcpu in a register, and get curthread from pcpu,
which is not very atomic, and led to issues if the thread was migrated
to another core between the time we got the pcpu address and the time we
got curthread.
Instead, we now store curthread where pcpu used to be store, and we
calculate the pcpu address based on the cpu id.
It turns out the version of gas we're using interprets the old '_all' mask
as 'fc' instead of 'fsxc'. That is, "all" doesn't really mean "all".
This was the cause of the "wrong-endian register restore" bug that's
been causing problems with some cortex-a9 chips. The 'endian' bit in the
spsr register would never get changed (it falls into the 'x' mask group)
and the first return-from-exception would fail if the chip had powered on
with garbage in the spsr register that included the big-endian bit. It's
unknown why this affected only certain cortex-a9 chips.
because an exception may happen at any time. The stack alignment rules on
ARM EABI state the only place the stack must be 8-byte aligned is on a
function boundary.
If an exception happens while a function is setting up or tearing down it's
stack frame it may not be correctly aligned. There is also no requirement
for it to be when the function is a leaf node.
The fix is to align the stack after we have stored a backup of the old stack
pointer, but before we have stored anything in the trapframe. Along with
this we need to adjust the size of the trapframe by 4 bytes to ensure the
stack below it is also correctly aligned.
past a trapframe.
Use this macro in exception_exit as it is the function the unwinder enters
as the functions that store the frame setting lr to point to it.
Cummulative patch of changes that are not vendor-specific:
- ARMv6 and ARMv7 architecture support
- ARM SMP support
- VFP/Neon support
- ARM Generic Interrupt Controller driver
- Simplification of startup code for all platforms
- A race condition could happen if two threads were using RAS at the same time
as the code didn't reset RAS_END, the RAS code could believe we were not in
a RAS, when we were in fact.
- Using signed value logic to compare addresses wasn't such a good idea.
Many thanks to Ian to investigate on these issues.
Pointy hat to: cognet
PR: arm/161498
Submitted by: Ian Lepore <freebsd At damnhippie DOT dyndns dot org
MFC after: 1 week
De-hardcode usage of ARM_TP_ADDRESS and RAS local storage, and move this
special purpose page to a more convenient place i.e. after the vectors high
page, more towards the end of address space. Previous location (0xe000_0000)
caused grief if KVA was to go beyond the default limit.
Note that ARM world rebuilding is required after this change since the
location of ARM_TP_ADDRESS is shared between kernel and userland.
Submitted by: Grzegorz Bernacki (gjb AT semihalf dot com)
Reviewed by: imp
Approved by: cognet (mentor)
The RAS implementation would set the end address, then the start
address. These were used by the kernel to restart a RAS sequence if
it was interrupted. When the thread switching code ran, it would
check these values and adjust the PC and clear them if it did.
However, there's a small flaw in this scheme. Thread T1, sets the end
address and gets preempted. Thread T2 runs and also does a RAS
operation. This resets end to zero. Thread T1 now runs again and
sets start and then begins the RAS sequence, but is preempted before
the RAS sequence executes its last instruction. The kernel code that
would ordinarily restart the RAS sequence doesn't because the PC isn't
between start and 0, so the PC isn't set to the start of the sequence.
So when T1 is resumed again, it is at the wrong location for RAS to
produce the correct results. This causes the wrong results for the
atomic sequence.
The window for the first race is 3 instructions. The window for the
second race is 5-10 instructions depending on the atomic operation.
This makes this failure fairly rare and hard to reproduce.
Mutexs are implemented in libthr using atomic operations. When the
above race would occur, a lock could get stuck locked, causing many
downstream problems, as you might expect.
Also, make sure to reset the start and end address when doing a syscall, or
a malicious process could set them before doing a syscall.
Reviewed by: imp, ups (thanks guys)
Pointy hat to: cognet
MFC After: 3 days
It only supports sa1110 (on simics) right now, but xscale support should come
soon.
Some of the initial work has been provided by :
Stephane Potvin <sepotvin at videotron.ca>
Most of this comes from NetBSD.
