so that when I applied the patch to my check-in tree the top half of my patch failed to
apply. Off course I saw what I *expected* to see (the bottom half succeeded) and
didn't notice that it had failed to apply cleanly.
Approved by: re (bmah)
in most cases, except one. The 'restart' case was not working as expected. Specifically,
it would stop both lockd and statd, but it would restart only statd (which appears first
in the script). This is because rc.subr(8) contains code to guard against infinite
recursion in the 'restart' casae.
To fix this use the traditional approach of controlling only one server from one script by
breaking out rc.d/nfslocking into its contituent parts: rc.d/lockd and rc.d/statd. Keep
rc.d/nfslocking around but don't include it in the boot rcorder(8)ing.
PR: conf/107316
Approved by: re (bmah)
MFC after: 2 weeks
"forced". If some pre-condition is not met, it should fail as it normally
does and rc.subr(8) will make the appropriate decision. Incidentally, the
previous behaviour had a bug where the "force" flag was respected only
when checking rc.conf(5) knobs. The flag was ignored when verifying the
rpcbind(8) dependency.
MFC after: 2 weeks
in keeping the scripts under rc.d in sync with us. So, remove
NetBSD specific stuff (which made our scripts more complicated
than necessary).
The NetBSD ident string will be left intact, both for history and
also incase we wish to pull in future versions.
in keeping the scripts under rc.d in sync with us. So, begin removal
of NetBSD specific stuff (which made our scripts more complicated
than necessary), starting with the NetBSD KEYWORD.
while. This is only the script pieces, the glue for the build comes next.
Submitted by: Mike Makonnen <makonnen@pacbell.net>
Reviewed by: silence on -current and -hackers
Prodded by: rwatson
