Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Warner Losh
031beb4e23 sys: Remove $FreeBSD$: one-line sh pattern
Remove /^\s*#[#!]?\s*\$FreeBSD\$.*$\n/
2023-08-16 11:54:58 -06:00
Kyle Evans
78373a5faa modules: adding some missing opt_* dependencies
if_vlan grew a dependency on opt_inet6.h in r356993
if_lagg and if_vlan both grew a dependency on opt_kern_tls.h in r351522

This is needed for standalone module builds of these guys.
2020-01-29 22:43:56 +00:00
Enji Cooper
193d9e768b sys/modules: normalize .CURDIR-relative paths to SRCTOP
This simplifies make output/logic

Tested with:	`cd sys/modules; make ALL_MODULES=` on amd64
MFC after:	1 month
Sponsored by:	Dell EMC Isilon
2017-03-04 10:10:17 +00:00
Hans Petter Selasky
f3e7afe2d7 Implement kernel support for hardware rate limited sockets.
- Add RATELIMIT kernel configuration keyword which must be set to
enable the new functionality.

- Add support for hardware driven, Receive Side Scaling, RSS aware, rate
limited sendqueues and expose the functionality through the already
established SO_MAX_PACING_RATE setsockopt(). The API support rates in
the range from 1 to 4Gbytes/s which are suitable for regular TCP and
UDP streams. The setsockopt(2) manual page has been updated.

- Add rate limit function callback API to "struct ifnet" which supports
the following operations: if_snd_tag_alloc(), if_snd_tag_modify(),
if_snd_tag_query() and if_snd_tag_free().

- Add support to ifconfig to view, set and clear the IFCAP_TXRTLMT
flag, which tells if a network driver supports rate limiting or not.

- This patch also adds support for rate limiting through VLAN and LAGG
intermediate network devices.

- How rate limiting works:

1) The userspace application calls setsockopt() after accepting or
making a new connection to set the rate which is then stored in the
socket structure in the kernel. Later on when packets are transmitted
a check is made in the transmit path for rate changes. A rate change
implies a non-blocking ifp->if_snd_tag_alloc() call will be made to the
destination network interface, which then sets up a custom sendqueue
with the given rate limitation parameter. A "struct m_snd_tag" pointer is
returned which serves as a "snd_tag" hint in the m_pkthdr for the
subsequently transmitted mbufs.

2) When the network driver sees the "m->m_pkthdr.snd_tag" different
from NULL, it will move the packets into a designated rate limited sendqueue
given by the snd_tag pointer. It is up to the individual drivers how the rate
limited traffic will be rate limited.

3) Route changes are detected by the NIC drivers in the ifp->if_transmit()
routine when the ifnet pointer in the incoming snd_tag mismatches the
one of the network interface. The network adapter frees the mbuf and
returns EAGAIN which causes the ip_output() to release and clear the send
tag. Upon next ip_output() a new "snd_tag" will be tried allocated.

4) When the PCB is detached the custom sendqueue will be released by a
non-blocking ifp->if_snd_tag_free() call to the currently bound network
interface.

Reviewed by:		wblock (manpages), adrian, gallatin, scottl (network)
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3687
Sponsored by:		Mellanox Technologies
MFC after:		3 months
2017-01-18 13:31:17 +00:00
Warner Losh
aeaed50898 Move most of the 15 variations on generating opt_inet.h and
opt_inet6.h into kmod.mk by forcing almost everybody to eat the same
dogfood. While at it, consolidate the opt_bpf.h and opt_mroute.h
targets here too.
2014-08-04 22:37:02 +00:00
Warner Losh
c6063d0da8 Use src.opts.mk in preference to bsd.own.mk except where we need stuff
from the latter.
2014-05-06 04:22:01 +00:00
Andrew Thompson
18242d3b09 Rename the trunk(4) driver to lagg(4) as it is too similar to vlan trunking.
The name trunk is misused as the networking term trunk means carrying multiple
VLANs over a single connection. The IEEE standard for link aggregation (802.3
section 3) does not talk about 'trunk' at all while it is used throughout IEEE
802.1Q in describing vlans.

The lagg(4) driver provides link aggregation, failover and fault tolerance.

Discussed on:	current@
2007-04-17 00:35:11 +00:00