time_t. Deal with the possibility that time_t != int32_t. This boils
down to this sort of thing:
- time(&ut.ut_time);
+ ut.ut_time = time(NULL);
and similar for ctime(3) etc. I've kept it minimal for the stuff
that may need to be portable (or 3rd party code), but used Matt's time32
stuff for cases where that isn't as much of a concern.
Approved by: re (jhb)
it as being in range.
set ifaddr 1.2.3.4/0 5.6.7.8/0
no longer allows 0.0.0.0 as a valid IP.
Reported/tested by: Bohdan Horst <nexus@hoth.amu.edu.pl>
MFC after: 3 days
contributor)
- support ipv6cpretry and ipv6cpretries, which are IPv6 versions
of ipcpretry and ipcpretries.
- improve handling of IPv6 link-local addresses
Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
called <machine/_types.h>.
o <machine/ansi.h> will continue to live so it can define MD clock
macros, which are only MD because of gratuitous differences between
architectures.
o Change all headers to make use of this. This mainly involves
changing:
#ifdef _BSD_FOO_T_
typedef _BSD_FOO_T_ foo_t;
#undef _BSD_FOO_T_
#endif
to:
#ifndef _FOO_T_DECLARED
typedef __foo_t foo_t;
#define _FOO_T_DECLARED
#endif
Concept by: bde
Reviewed by: jake, obrien
Objected to by: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>
After Andre's objection, I've re-examined rfc 2759 and noted that it
says that the domain name shouldn't be used when generating the
NT-Response field. So it looks like the bug is in freeradius rather
than in ppp.
This removes a bad latency problem during initial setup where we
end up waiting for too long before reading the connected message
and time the connection out.
Problem figured out by: Andre Albsmeier <andre@albsmeier.net>
path... after we've talked to any RADIUS servers involved, so that we
haven't touched the data before it gets to the server.
Make it clearer in the code that this compensation is done by setting
a flag to a value of zero, a flag which rfc2759 says *MUST* be zero.
While we're here, don't bother passing the peer challenge into
radius_Authenticate(). It's already part of the key we're passing in
(this becomes obvious now that I've structured that data...).
This ``fix'' doesn't help to authenticate Win98/WinME users in my test
environment as ports/net/freeradius seems to ignore the flag
completely anyway, but it may help with other RADIUS servers.
RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_CHAP_ERROR and RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_CHAP2_SUCCESS
messages, and remove the hack in chap.c to ignore that ident field
on the client side.
This anomoly was hacked around during development, and I forgot to
go back and fix it properly.
Spotted by: Sergey Korolew <ds@rt.balakovo.ru>
RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_MPPE_ENCRYPTION_POLICY
RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_MPPE_ENCRYPTION_TYPES
RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_MPPE_RECV_KEY
RAD_MICROSOFT_MS_MPPE_SEND_KEY
These attributes may be supplied by a RADIUS server when MSCHAPv2 is
used to authenticate.
It *should* now be possible to build ppp with -DNODES and still support
CHAP/MSCHAP/MSCHAPv2/MPPE via a RADIUS server, but the code isn't yet
smart enough to do that (building with -DNODES just looses these
facilities).
Sponsored by: Monzoon
sufficient.
In fact, using both breaks the radiator RADIUS daemon when used with
a db as it maps both attributes to the same field value and then
fails the insert.
I decided to remove RAD_NAS_IP_ADDRESS on the basis that rfc2138 says:
An Access-Request MUST contain a User-Name attribute. It SHOULD
contain either a NAS-IP-Address attribute or NAS-Identifier
attribute (or both, although that is not recommended). It MUST
despite the fact that this not recommended bit was removed from the
updated rfc.
