Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alan Somers
1d57432685 ifconfig displays ND6_IFF_NO_DAD as "IGNORELOOP"
PR:		218958
Reviewed by:	kristof
MFC after:	3 weeks
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10543
2017-05-03 01:46:39 +00:00
Don Lewis
c871174916 Use strlcpy() instead of strncpy() when copying ifname to ensure
that it is NUL terminated.  Additional NUL padding is not required
for short names.

Use sizeof(destination) in a few places instead of IFNAMSIZ.

Cast afp->af_ridreq and afp->af_addreq  to make the intent of
the code more obvious.

Reported by:	Coverity
CID:		1009628, 1009630, 1009631, 1009632, 1009633, 1009635, 1009638
CID:		1009639, 1009640, 1009641, 1009642, 1009643, 1009644, 1009645
CID:		1009646, 1009647, 1010049, 1010050, 1010051, 1010052, 1010053
CID:		1010054, 1011293, 1011294, 1011295, 1011296, 1011297, 1011298
CID:		1011299, 1305821, 1351720, 1351721
MFC after:	1 week
2016-05-16 00:25:24 +00:00
Gleb Smirnoff
56d5e0967c Stop including if_var.h from userland.
Sponsored by:	Nginx, Inc.
2015-04-06 09:42:23 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
23e9ffb0e1 - Implement loopback probing state in enhanced DAD algorithm.
- Add no_dad and ignoreloop per-IF knob.  no_dad disables DAD completely,
  and ignoreloop is to prevent infinite loop in loopback probing state when
  loopback is permanently expected.
2015-03-05 21:27:49 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
4099f7e640 Fix a typo (s/error/errno/). 2013-07-03 09:50:59 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
33cfdcc3ba Do not display a warning message in a jail without AF_INET6 support.
MFC after:	3 days
2013-06-30 07:37:31 +00:00
Hajimu UMEMOTO
164051cea5 Add no_prefer_iface option.
It stops treating the address on the interface as special by source
address selection rule even when the interface is outgoing interface.
This is desired in some situation.

Requested by:	hrs
Reviewed by:	IHANet folks including hrs
MFC after:	1 week
2013-01-09 18:18:08 +00:00
Kevin Lo
a5752d55e0 Fix socket calls on error post-r243965.
Submitted by:	Garrett Cooper
2012-12-21 15:54:13 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
8a3beec66e Skip nd6 line with no warning message when the system does not support
INET6.

Spotted by:	flo
2012-05-11 20:01:45 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
e7fa8d0ada - Accept Router Advertisement messages even when net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1.
- A new per-interface knob IFF_ND6_NO_RADR and sysctl IPV6CTL_NO_RADR.
  This controls if accepting a route in an RA message as the default route.
  The default value for each interface can be set by net.inet6.ip6.no_radr.
  The system wide default value is 0.

- A new sysctl: net.inet6.ip6.norbit_raif.  This controls if setting R-bit in
  NA on RA accepting interfaces.  The default is 0 (R-bit is set based on
  net.inet6.ip6.forwarding).

Background:

 IPv6 host/router model suggests a router sends an RA and a host accepts it for
 router discovery.  Because of that, KAME implementation does not allow
 accepting RAs when net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1.  Accepting RAs on a router can
 make the routing table confused since it can change the default router
 unintentionally.

 However, in practice there are cases where we cannot distinguish a host from
 a router clearly.  For example, a customer edge router often works as a host
 against the ISP, and as a router against the LAN at the same time.  Another
 example is a complex network configurations like an L2TP tunnel for IPv6
 connection to Internet over an Ethernet link with another native IPv6 subnet.
 In this case, the physical interface for the native IPv6 subnet works as a
 host, and the pseudo-interface for L2TP works as the default IP forwarding
 route.

Problem:

 Disabling processing RA messages when net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 and
 accepting them when net.inet6.ip6.forward=0 cause the following practical
 issues:

 - A router cannot perform SLAAC.  It becomes a problem if a box has
   multiple interfaces and you want to use SLAAC on some of them, for
   example.  A customer edge router for IPv6 Internet access service
   using an IPv6-over-IPv6 tunnel sometimes needs SLAAC on the
   physical interface for administration purpose; updating firmware
   and so on (link-local addresses can be used there, but GUAs by
   SLAAC are often used for scalability).

 - When a host has multiple IPv6 interfaces and it receives multiple RAs on
   them, controlling the default route is difficult.  Router preferences
   defined in RFC 4191 works only when the routers on the links are
   under your control.

Details of Implementation Changes:

 Router Advertisement messages will be accepted even when
 net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1.  More precisely, the conditions are as
 follow:

 (ACCEPT_RTADV && !NO_RADR && !ip6.forwarding)
	=> Normal RA processing on that interface. (as IPv6 host)

 (ACCEPT_RTADV && (NO_RADR || ip6.forwarding))
	=> Accept RA but add the router to the defroute list with
	   rtlifetime=0 unconditionally.  This effectively prevents
	   from setting the received router address as the box's
	   default route.

 (!ACCEPT_RTADV)
	=> No RA processing on that interface.

 ACCEPT_RTADV and NO_RADR are per-interface knob.  In short, all interface
 are classified as "RA-accepting" or not.  An RA-accepting interface always
 processes RA messages regardless of ip6.forwarding.  The difference caused by
 NO_RADR or ip6.forwarding is whether the RA source address is considered as
 the default router or not.

 R-bit in NA on the RA accepting interfaces is set based on
 net.inet6.ip6.forwarding.  While RFC 6204 W-1 rule (for CPE case) suggests
 a router should disable the R-bit completely even when the box has
 net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1, I believe there is no technical reason with
 doing so.  This behavior can be set by a new sysctl net.inet6.ip6.norbit_raif
 (the default is 0).

Usage:

 # ifconfig fxp0 inet6 accept_rtadv
	=> accept RA on fxp0
 # ifconfig fxp0 inet6 accept_rtadv no_radr
	=> accept RA on fxp0 but ignore default route information in it.
 # sysctl net.inet6.ip6.norbit_no_radr=1
	=> R-bit in NAs on RA accepting interfaces will always be set to 0.
2011-06-06 02:14:23 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
c3cc3217bc Add the "nd6 options" line handler as af_other_status() of AF_INET6, not as an
own address family.

Reviewed by:	bz
2011-06-05 11:37:20 +00:00
Bjoern A. Zeeb
5af3fa9a5f Conditionally compile in the af_inet and af_inet6, af_nd6 modules.
If compiled in for dual-stack use, test with feature_present(3)
to see if we should register the IPv4/IPv6 address family related
options.

In case there is no "inet" support we would love to go with the
usage() and make the address family mandatory (as it is for anything
but inet in theory).  Unfortunately people are used to
  ifconfig IF up/down
etc. as well, so use a fallback of "link".  Adjust the man page
to reflect these minor details.

Improve error handling printing a warning in addition to the usage
telling that we do not know the given address family in two places.

Reviewed by:	hrs, rwatson
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
Sponsored by:	iXsystems
MFC after:	2 weeks
2011-05-31 14:40:21 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
7590eb54ce Use printb() to display the "nd6 options=" line. 2009-10-12 21:11:50 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
a283298ce3 Improve flexibility of receiving Router Advertisement and
automatic link-local address configuration:

- Convert a sysctl net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to one for the
  default value of a per-IF flag ND6_IFF_ACCEPT_RTADV, not a
  global knob.  The default value of the sysctl is 0.

- Add a new per-IF flag ND6_IFF_AUTO_LINKLOCAL and convert a
  sysctl net.inet6.ip6.auto_linklocal to one for its default
  value.  The default value of the sysctl is 1.

- Make ND6_IFF_IFDISABLED more robust.  It can be used to disable
  IPv6 functionality of an interface now.

- Receiving RA is allowed if ip6_forwarding==0 *and*
  ND6_IFF_ACCEPT_RTADV is set on that interface.  The former
  condition will be revisited later to support a "host + router" box
  like IPv6 CPE router.  The current behavior is compatible with
  the older releases of FreeBSD.

- The ifconfig(8) now supports these ND6 flags as well as "nud",
  "prefer_source", and "disabled" in ndp(8).  The ndp(8) now
  supports "auto_linklocal".

Discussed with:	bz and jinmei
Reviewed by:	bz
MFC after:	3 days
2009-09-12 22:08:20 +00:00