be held when entering a kqueue filter for fifos via a socket buffer
event: as such, assert the lock unconditionally rather than acquiring
it conditionall.
MFC after: 3 days
1) fifo_kqfilter() is not actually ever used, it likely should be GC'd.
2) fifo_kqfilter_f() doesn't implement EVFILT_VNODE, so detecting events
on the underlying vnode for a fifo no longer works (it did in 4.x).
Likely, fifo_kqfilter_f() should forward the request to the VFS using
fp->f_vnode, which would work once fifo_kqfilter() was detached from
the vnode operation vector (removing the fifo override).
Discussed with: phk
used when a read filter is requested on a write-only fifo descriptor, or
a write filter is requested on a read-only fifo descriptor. This
permits the filters to be registered, but never raises the event, which
causes kqueue behavior for fifos to more closely match similar semantics
for poll and select, which permit testing for the condition even though
the condition will never be raised, and is consistent with POSIX's notion
that a fifo has identical semantics to a one-way IPC channel created
using pipe() on most operating systems.
The fifo regression test suite can now run to completion on HEAD without
errors.
MFC after: 3 days
- Remove an assertion in sound.c, it's not needed (and causes a panic now).
From the conversation via mail between glebius and Ariff:
---snip---
> Well, but which mutex protects now? Do we own anything else
> in pcm_chnalloc()? I see some queue(4) macros in pcm_chnalloc(),
> they should be protected, shouldn't they?
Queue insertion/removal occur during
1) driver loading (which is pretty much single thread /
sequential) or unloading (mutex protected, bail out if there is
any channel with refcount > 0 or busy).
2) vchan_create()/destroy(), (which is *sigh* quite complicated), but
somehow protected by 'master'/parent channel mutex. Other
thread cannot add/remove vchan (or even continue traversing
that queue) unless it can acquire parent channel mutex.
---snip---
Fix the locking in dsp.c to prevent a LOR (AFAIK not on the LOR page).
Submitted by: Ariff Abdullah <skywizard@MyBSD.org.my>
Tested with: INVARIANTS[1] and DIAGNOSTICS[2]
Tested by: netchild [1,2], David Reid <david@jetnet.co.uk> [1]
'buffers' pending NMIs from multiple interrupting PMCs and delivers
them serially.
Reported by: Olivier Crameri <olivier.crameri@epfl.ch>
MFC after: 3 days
according to POSIX, not to mention the fact that it doesn't make sense
(and hence isn't really implemented). This causes the fifo_misc
regression test to succeed.
file descriptor. Otherwise, the read end of a fifo might return that it
is writable (which it isn't).
Only poll the fifo for write events if the fifo attached to a writable
file descriptor. Otherwise, the write end of a fifo might return that
it is readable (which it isn't).
In the event that a file is FREAD|FWRITE (which is allowed by POSIX, but
has undefined behavior), we poll for both.
MFC after: 3 days
to poll the write socket for, the fifo polling code proceeded to poll
for the complete set of events. Use 'levents' instead of 'events' as
the argument to poll, and only poll the write socket if there is
interest in write events.
MFC after: 3 days
while sleeping to allocate fifo state: due to using the vnode lock to
serialize access to a fifo during open, it shouldn't happen (tm).
MFC after: 3 days
In case this causes trouble for some other chipsets add a comment how to
proceed. If we don't get bugreports, this should be removed after a while
(some releases?).
PR: 56617 [1], 29465, 39260, 40574, 68225
Submitted by: Matthew E. Gove <mgove@comcast.net> [1]
believe that there are PC98 systems with an OPTi chip.
I don't know enough about this special PC architecture to be sure about
this, so let's find out by letting people with such a system complain in
case this commit breaks the sound system for them. It's easy to revert
then.
PR: 45673
Submitted by: Watanabe Kazuhiro <CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp>
