sizeof(*list), not sizeof(**list). (i.e., sizeof(pointer) rather than
sizeof(char)).
It is possible that this buffer overflow is exploitable, but it was
added after RELENG_5 forked and hasn't been MFCed, so this will not
receive an advisory.
Submitted by: Vitezslav Novy
MFC after: 1 day
if _FREEFALL_CONFIG is set gcc bails since pam_sm_setcred() in pam_krb5.c
no longer uses any of its parameters.
Pointy hat: kensmith
Approved by: re (scottl)
branches but missed HEAD. This patch extends his a little bit,
setting it up via the Makefiles so that adding _FREEFALL_CONFIG
to /etc/make.conf is the only thing needed to cluster-ize things
(current setup also requires overriding CFLAGS).
From Peter's commit to the RELENG_* branches:
> Add the freebsd.org custer's source modifications under #ifdefs to aid
> keeping things in sync. For ksu:
> * install suid-root by default
> * don't fall back to asking for a unix password (ie: be pure kerberos)
> * allow custom user instances for things like www and not just root
The Makefile tweaks will be MFC-ed, the rest is already done.
MFC after: 3 days
Approved by: re (dwhite)
copy the acquired TGT from the in-memory cache to the on-disk cache
at login. This was documented but un-implemented behavior.
MFC after: 1 week
PR: bin/64464
Reported and tested by: Eric van Gyzen <vangyzen at stat dot duke dot edu>
If turned on no NIS support and related programs will be built.
Lost parts rediscovered by: Danny Braniss <danny at cs.huji.ac.il>
PR: bin/68303
No objections: des, gshapiro, nectar
Reviewed by: ru
Approved by: rwatson (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
of releases. The -DNOCRYPT build option still exists for anyone who
really wants to build non-cryptographic binaries, but the "crypto"
release distribution is now part of "base", and anyone installing from a
release will get cryptographic binaries.
Approved by: re (scottl), markm
Discussed on: freebsd-current, in late April 2004
that this provokes. "Wherever possible" means "In the kernel OR NOT
C++" (implying C).
There are places where (void *) pointers are not valid, such as for
function pointers, but in the special case of (void *)0, agreement
settles on it being OK.
Most of the fixes were NULL where an integer zero was needed; many
of the fixes were NULL where ascii <nul> ('\0') was needed, and a
few were just "other".
Tested on: i386 sparc64
These files had tags after the copyright notice,
inside the comment block (incorrect, removed),
and outside the comment block (correct).
Approved by: rwatson (mentor)
