To minimise NUMA traffic allocate the pcpu, dpcpu, and boot stacks in
the correct domain when possible.
Submitted by: markj
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32338
Many extern struct pcpu <something>__pcpu declarations were
copied/pasted in sources. The issue is that the definition is MD, but
it cannot be provided by machine/pcpu.h due to actual struct pcpu
defined in sys/pcpu.h later than the inclusion of machine/pcpu.h.
This forced the copying when other code needed direct access to
__pcpu. There is no way around it, due to machine/pcpu.h supplying
part of struct pcpu fields.
To work around the problem, add a new machine/pcpu_aux.h header, which
should fill any needed MD definitions after struct pcpu definition is
completed. This allows to remove copies of __pcpu spread around the
source. Also on x86 it makes it possible to remove work arounds like
OFFSETOF_CURTHREAD or clang specific warnings supressions.
Reported and tested by: lwhsu, bcran
Reviewed by: imp, markj (previous version)
Discussed with: jhb
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21418
- Change pcpu zone consumers to use a stride size of PAGE_SIZE.
(defined as UMA_PCPU_ALLOC_SIZE to make future identification easier)
- Allocate page from the correct domain for a given cpu.
- Don't initialize pc_domain to non-zero value if NUMA is not defined
There are some misconceptions surrounding this field. It is the
_VM_ NUMA domain and should only ever correspond to valid domain
values as understood by the VM.
The former slab size of sizeof(struct pcpu) was somewhat arbitrary.
The new value is PAGE_SIZE because that's the smallest granularity
which the VM can allocate a slab for a given domain. If you have
fewer than PAGE_SIZE/8 counters on your system there will be some
memory wasted, but this is obviously something where you want the
cache line to be coming from the correct domain.
Reviewed by: jeff
Sponsored by: Limelight Networks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15933
in place. To do per-cpu stats, convert all fields that previously were
maintained in the vmmeters that sit in pcpus to counter(9).
- Since some vmmeter stats may be touched at very early stages of boot,
before we have set up UMA and we can do counter_u64_alloc(), provide an
early counter mechanism:
o Leave one spare uint64_t in struct pcpu, named pc_early_dummy_counter.
o Point counter(9) fields of vmmeter to pcpu[0].pc_early_dummy_counter,
so that at early stages of boot, before counters are allocated we already
point to a counter that can be safely written to.
o For sparc64 that required a whole dummy pcpu[MAXCPU] array.
Further related changes:
- Don't include vmmeter.h into pcpu.h.
- vm.stats.vm.v_swappgsout and vm.stats.vm.v_swappgsin changed to 64-bit,
to match kernel representation.
- struct vmmeter hidden under _KERNEL, and only vmstat(1) is an exclusion.
This is based on benno@'s 4-year old patch:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2013-July/014471.html
Reviewed by: kib, gallatin, marius, lidl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10156
The MFC will include a compat definition of smp_no_rendevous_barrier()
that calls smp_no_rendezvous_barrier().
Reviewed by: gnn, kib
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10313
On arm64 use atomics. Then, both arm and arm64 do not need a critical
section around update. Replace all cpus loop by CPU_FOREACH().
This brings arm and arm64 counter(9) implementation closer to current
amd64, but being more RISC-y, arm* version cannot avoid atomics.
Reported by: Alexandre Martins <alexandre.martins@stormshield.eu>
Reviewed by: andrew
Tested by: Alexandre Martins, andrew
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 2 weeks
This is only the minimum set of files needed to boot in qemu. As such it is
missing a few things.
The bus_dma code is currently only stub functions with a full implementation
from the development tree to follow.
The gic driver has been copied as the interrupt framework is different. It
is expected the two drivers will be merged by the arm intrng project,
however this will need to be imported into the tree and support for arm64
would need to be added.
This includes code developed by myself, SemiHalf, Ed Maste, and Robin
Randhawa from ARM. This has been funded by the FreeBSD Foundation, with
early development by myself in my spare time with assistance from Robin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2199
Reviewed by: emaste, imp
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
