fix a slight confusion about which draft of threads we are supporting.
this allows something as big and ugly as samba to be compiled with libc_r
and still work! our user-level pthreads seems amazingly robust!
of the user's timezone failed), don't bail if the specified timezone
doesn't have an offset; in this case it isn't going to. (Perhaps it would
be better to change the caller to always supply one, but this is quick
and clean and fixes the bug in the easiest possible way.)
Should be in 2.2. Fixes (properly) PR#1740.
Here are the diffs for libc_r to get it one step closer to P1003.1c
These make most of the thread/mutex/condvar structures opaque to the
user. There are three functions which have been renamed with _np
suffixes because they are extensions to P1003.1c (I did them for JAVA,
which needs to suspend/resume threads and also start threads suspended).
I've created a new header (pthread_np.h) for the non-POSIX stuff.
The egrep tags stuff in /usr/src/lib/libc_r/Makefile that I uncommented
doesn't work. I think its best to delete it. I don't think libc_r needs
tags anyway, 'cause most of the source is in libc which does have tags.
also:
Here's the first batch of man pages for the thread functions.
The diff to /usr/src/lib/libc_r/Makefile removes some stuff that was
inherited from /usr/src/lib/libc/Makefile that should only be done with
libc.
also:
I should have sent this diff with the pthread(3) man page.
It allows people to type
make -DWANT_LIBC_R world
to get libc_r built with the rest of the world. I put this in the
pthread(3) man page. The default is still not to build libc_r.
also:
The diff attached adds a pthread(3) man page to /usr/src/share/man/man3.
The idea is that without libc_r installed, this man page will give people
enough info to know that they have to build libc_r.
part that does zic(8)/zdump(8) is still yet to be imported (but the old
zic and zdump will work just fine with these header files and the
data format has not changed).
changeover, so we have to extend the format of timezone files (in a backward-
compatible way, of course). This probably means that libc needs a minor
version number bump before 2.2 is released (or maybe not).
