Yes, this means for stuff OTHER than jails, too. Example usage:
#devfs_system_ruleset="root"
devfs_set_rulesets="/dev=root /etc/namedb/dev=named_devfs"
devfs(8) rules in rc(8). It is most useful for applying
rules to devfs(5) mount points in /dev or inside jails.
The following line of script is sufficient to
mount a relatively useful+secure devfs(5) in a jail:
devfs_mount_jail /some/jail/dev
Some new shell routines available to scripts that source
rc.subr(5):
o devfs_link - Makes it a little easier to create symlinks
o devfs_init_rulesets - Create devfs(8) rulesets from devfs.rules
o devfs_set_ruleset - Set a ruleset to a devfs(5) mount
o devfs_apply_ruleset - Apply a ruleset to a devfs(5) mount
o devfs_domount - Mount devfs(5) and apply some ruleset
o devfs_mount_jail - Mount devfs(5) and apply a ruleset
appropriate to jails.
Additional rulesets can be specified in /etc/devfs.rules.
If the devfs_system_ruleset variable is defined in rc.conf
and it contains the name of a ruleset defined in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules
or user supplied rulesets in /etc/devfs.rules then that ruleset will
be applied to /dev at startup by the /etc/rc.d/devfs script. It can
also be applied post-startup:
/etc/rc.d/devfs start
This is a more flexible mechanism than the previous method of using
/etc/devfs.conf. However, that method is still available.
Note: since devfs(8) doesn't provide any way for creating symlinks
as part of a ruleset, anyone wishing to create symlinks in a devfs(5)
as part of the bootup sequence will still have to rely on /etc/devfs.conf.
script to read /etc/devfs.conf, and take appropriate actions based on
what it finds there.
The (commented out) examples in the new devfs.conf file are taken in
part from the old rc.devfs script.
We can't remove the sourcing of /etc/rc.devfs yet in case the user
might have custom entries in it. We will have to come up with an
/etc/devfs.rules or something to make this kind of thing easier.
Approved by: markm (mentor)(implicit)
that's being replaced here. This is what /etc/rc does now.
There is no NetBSD devfs, so there is no compatibility issue.
Not objected to by: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com
Approved by: re (murray)
while. This is only the script pieces, the glue for the build comes next.
Submitted by: Mike Makonnen <makonnen@pacbell.net>
Reviewed by: silence on -current and -hackers
Prodded by: rwatson
