The GCC developers separated out the configure header between libU77 and
libI77 and FreeBSD didn't keep up with the change. So now this header needs
to be a superset of both sublib's configuration specification.
Notably this commit causes ftruncate(), fseeko(), and ftello() to be used.
PR: 22635
Of course, libdialog is still chock-full of similar bugs, but it's been
multiple years and no one has any better suggestions so the bugs will just
be dealt with case-by-case.
PR: 28221
binaries in /bin and /sbin installed in /lib. Only the versioned files
reside in /lib, the .so symlink continues to live /usr/lib so the
toolchain doesn't need to be modified.
idea after all.
Fix cross-builds and ia64 builds. gnu/lib/csu/Makefile is modified to
pre-include osreldate.h and gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/auto-host.h
will avoid including sys/param.h if __FreeBSD_version is already defined.
shared library being built for amd64. The problem is that libstdc++.so
is produced with 'cc -shared'. This has an internal -lgcc, which is
not PIC. libstdc++.so uses exceptions and the dwarf2 unwinder, which
are in libgcc.a. As a result, non-PIC code gets pulled into libstdc++.so.
This is fatal on amd64 when certain relocation types cannot be used in
PIC mode. The official FSF solution to this is to have libgcc.so with
internal ELF symbol versioning to solve the ABI problem, but I dont want
to fight that battle yet. I tried making libgcc_pic.a (which worked
fine), but thats not something for the 11th hour before a release.
Approved by: re (amd64 "safe" stuff)
not to blindly undef isnan() and other functions that became macros in C99.
Enable use of newly grown C99 functions: strtof(), strtold(), wcstof()
Submitted by: das
shared object of libobjc, we end up linking in from the archive
version. This is wrong, because we don't compile the archive version
suitable for inclusion in shared objects. On ia64 this causes actual
breakages. Compile the archive version with PIC on ia64 to avoid
the breakage there and also to avoid changing the status quo on
other architectures. If other architectures have the same problem,
we probably should start building a shared library. There's no
indication however that other architectures actually need it.
Building the archive version with PIC on ia64 does pessimize linking
complete binaries (ie fully archive), but we don't use Objective-C
ourselves and so far I haven't seen non-shared executables written
in Objective-C, so I'm sure this will be nothing but academic.
Trigger case: ports/lang/gnustep-base
