not consider a "disabled" cpu as a CPU we have to ignore, and we should use
them if they provide a "enable-method".
While I'm there, support "ok" as well as "okay", while ePAPR only accepts
"okay", linux accepts "ok" too so we can expect it to be used.
Reviewed by: andrew (partially)
On some platforms, the /cpus node contains cpu-to-cluster
map which deffinitely is not a CPU node. Its presence was
causing incrementing of "id" variable and reporting more
CPUs available than it should.
To make "id" valid, increment it only when an entry really
is a CPU device.
Reviewed by: andrew
Obtained from: Semihalf
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3216
will be used with arm64 to find which cpus to enable, and could also be
used with 32-bit arm and mips for the same purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1825
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This will be needed by arm64 to find the value to pass to the psci (Power
State Coordination Interface) driver, among other things, used to enable
cores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1824
Reviewed by: imp
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
as the cpu id on arm64 as it may use two cells. In it's place we can use
the device id.
It is expected we will use the reg data on arm64 to enable cores so we
still need to read and store it even if it is not yet used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1555
Reviewed by: nwhitehorn
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
