-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
We don't produce these anymore as of r356797, remove the remnant in
generate-ucl.sh that accounted for them. This isn't strictly necessary, but
future work is needed for the various packages that can be generated on a
lib build.
Namely, we may produce -development packages for private/internal libs that
should be installed but won't have the base FreeBSD-libfoo pkg to depend on
because it's internal (e.g. liby, libpmcstat, libifconfig) but we want the
headers installed. It may be a better move to just shove these into
-runtime-development instead, but if not then we've just simplified the
cases that need to take private/internal libs into account.
This cuts out a large chunk of duplicated *.ucl files that just needed
dependencies tacked on, and gives generate-ucl.sh some leeway in case a
future pkg may need more than one dependency.
Run-through to determine which ones could simply be removed done with for i
in *.ucl; do diff -U3 template.ucl ${i}; done | less and inspecting for any
differences beyond just adding deps at the end. The remaining ucl files are
basically all differently-licensed, require scripts, or are marked vital.
I've opted to remove %PKGDEPS% entirely without regard for third-party ucl,
as pkgbase is not yet considered production. However, I do not hold a strong
position on this and there is approximately 0 chance it will return.
clibs should have been added previously in generate-ucl.sh as one that
doesn't have any dependencies, but do so now that we would otherwise be
tacking on the runtime dependency.
Reviewed by: manu, bapt (earlier version)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23415
The original intention for caroot was to be packaged separately, perhaps so
that users can have a more/less conservative upgrade policy for this
separated from the rest of base.
secure/caroot/Makefile doesn't have anything interesting to package, but its
subdirectories might. Move the PACKAGE= to Makefile.inc so both blacklisted
and trusted get packaged consistently into the correct one rather than the
default -utilities. Also tag the directories for package=caroot, as they
could also be empty; blacklisted is empty by default, but trusted is not.
Add a post-install script to do certctl rehash, along with a note should we
eventually come up with a way to detect that files have been added or
removed that requires a rehash.
-caroot gets a dependency on -utilities, as that's where we provide certctl
at the moment. We can perhaps reconsider this and put certctl into this
package in the future, but there are some bits within -utilities that
unconditionally invoke certctl so let's hold off for now.
Reviewed by: manu (earlier version, before -utilities dep added)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23352
The default pkg(8) from pkg.freebsd.org requires libjail.so,
so mark the jail package as vital along with the runtime
package to avoid errors when libjail.so is removed. This is
a no-op for systems with WITHOUT_JAIL in src.conf(5) and pkg(8)
built from the Ports Collection.
In order to make this work without marking packages such as
the jail-lib32, for example, the jail.ucl file needed to be
split out into separate files similarly to the runtime-*.ucl
files.
Glanced at by: brd
MFC after: 5 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
One of the major pain points with how this was implemented
is the requirement of in-tree, hard-coded <name>.ucl, as
well as <name>-<suffix>.ucl where <suffix> can be lib32,
profile, development, debug, or any combination of the four.
This created significant overhead when adding new packages
and any of the files in any of the combinations were missing.
Instead of test(1)-ing if the <packagename>.ucl file exists,
hand off to a script to figure out what the final ucl file
name should be before invoking pkg(8).
The default behavior is 'template.ucl' is used as a fallback.
This affects only the userland packages, as the kernel code
is already smart enough to handle these variations.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
