Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marcel Moolenaar
3cf55d3ab9 Add gpart(8).
In order to support gpart(8), geom(8) needs to support a named
argument. Also, optional string parameters are a requirement.
Both have been added to the infrastructure. The former required
all existing classes to be adjusted.
2007-05-15 20:25:18 +00:00
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
e15b9720f1 Fix mdoc warnings. 2007-05-06 00:31:38 +00:00
Alex Dupre
65835cf341 Call the multipath device with its real name. 2007-02-27 08:56:11 +00:00
Christian Brueffer
eb6cb8953e First cleanup pass: new sentence -> new line, typos fixed, some markup
errors fixed.
2007-02-27 07:53:20 +00:00
Matt Jacob
a5e9bfc6f9 Add a man page. 2007-02-27 07:29:15 +00:00
Matt Jacob
e770bc6bf5 First cut at GEOM based multipath. This is an active/passive{/passive...}
arrangement that has no intrinsic internal knowledge of whether devices
it is given are truly multipath devices. As such, this is a simplistic
approach, but still a useful one.

The basic approach is to (at present- this will change soon) use camcontrol
to find likely identical devices and and label the trailing sector of the
first one. This label contains both a full UUID and a name. The name is
what is presented in /dev/multipath, but the UUID is used as a true
distinguishor at g_taste time, thus making sure we don't have chaos
on a shared SAN where everyone names their data multipath as "Fred".

The first of N identical devices (and N *may* be 1!) becomes the active
path until a BIO request is failed with EIO or ENXIO. When this occurs,
the active disk is ripped away and the next in a list is picked to
(retry and) continue with.

During g_taste events new disks that meet the match criteria for existing
multipath geoms get added to the tail end of the list.

Thus, this active/passive setup actually does work for devices which
go away and come back, as do (now) mpt(4) and isp(4) SAN based disks.

There is still a lot to do to improve this- like about 5 of the 12
recommendations I've received about it,  but it's been functional enough
for a while that it deserves a broader test base.

Reviewed by: pjd
Sponsored by: IronPort Systems
MFC: 2 months
2007-02-27 04:01:58 +00:00