Convert the tests to the perl prove format.
Remove obsolete TEST.README (results of an old TEST.sh for some old Unices)
and TEST.csh (old tests without correct values, far less complete than
TEST.sh).
MFC after: 1 week
This moves the function of the noaliases variable into the checkkwd
variable. This way it is properly reset on errors and aliases can be used
normally in the commands for each case (the case labels recognize the
keyword esac but no aliases).
The new code is clearer as well.
Obtained from: dash
Apart from detecting breakage earlier or at all, this also fixes a segfault
in the testsuite. The "handling" of the breakage left an invalid internal
representation in some cases.
Examples:
echo a; do echo b
echo `) echo a`
echo `date; do do do`
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
subevalvar() incorrectly assumed that CTLESC bytes were present iff the
expansion was quoted. However, they are present iff various processing such
as word splitting is to be done later on.
Example:
v=@$e@$e@$e@
y="${v##*"$e"}"
echo "$y"
failed if $e contained the magic CTLESC byte.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
The code is inspired by NetBSD sh somewhat, but different because we
preserve the old Almquist/Bourne/Korn ability to have an unquoted part in a
quoted ${v+word}. For example, "${v-"*"}" expands to $v as a single field if
v is set, but generates filenames otherwise.
Note that this is the only place where we split text literally from the
script (the similar ${v=word} assigns to v and then expands $v). The parser
must now add additional markers to allow the expansion code to know whether
arbitrary characters in substitutions are quoted.
Example:
for i in ${$+a b c}; do echo $i; done
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
If double-quote state does not match, treat the '}' literally.
This ensures double-quote state remains the same before and after a
${v+-=?...} which helps with expand.c.
It makes things like
${foo+"\${bar}"}
which I have seen in the wild work as expected.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
This is a syntax error.
POSIX does not say explicitly whether defining a function with the same name
as a special builtin is allowed, but it does say that it is impossible to
call such a function.
A special builtin can still be overridden with an alias.
This commit is part of a set of changes that will ensure that when
something looks like a special builtin to the parser, it is one. (Not the
other way around, as it remains possible to call a special builtin named
by a variable or other substitution.)
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
Add some conservative checks on function names:
- Disallow expansions or quoting characters; these can only be called via
strange control characters
- Disallow '/'; these functions cannot be called anyway, as exec.c assumes
they are pathnames
- Make the CTL* bytes work properly in function names.
These are syntax errors.
POSIX does not require us to support more than names (letters, digits and
underscores, not starting with a digit), but I do not want to restrict it
that much at this time.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
This is how ksh93 treats ! within a pipeline and makes the ! in
a | ! b | c
negate the exit status of the pipeline, as if it were
a | { ! b | c; }
Side effect: something like
f() ! a
is now a syntax error, because a function definition takes a command,
not a pipeline.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
and why. The first case is correct usage which has but one correct output.
The 2nd and 3rd cases are incorrect usage in which the exact output is
not standardized and various shells give various allowable output.
immediately written into the stack after the call. Instead let the caller
manage the "space left".
Previously, growstackstr()'s assumption causes problems with STACKSTRNUL()
where we want to be able to turn a stack into a C string, and later
pretend the NUL is not there.
This fixes a bug in STACKSTRNUL() (that grew the stack) where:
1. STADJUST() called after a STACKSTRNUL() results in an improper adjust.
This can be seen in ${var%pattern} and ${var%%pattern} evaluation.
2. Memory leak in STPUTC() called after a STACKSTRNUL().
Reviewed by: jilles
are too long. Filenames escaping this test are caught later on,
so the bug doesn't cause any breakage.
Document the correct ustar limitations in pax. As I have no access
to the IEEE 1003.2 spec, I can only assume that the limitations
imposed are in fact correct.
Add regression tests for the filename limitations imposed by pax.
MFC after: 3 weeks
This Almquist extension was disabled long ago.
In pathname generation, components starting with '!!' were treated as
containing wildcards, causing unnecessary readdir (which could fail, causing
pathname generation to fail while it should not).
POSIX does not allow constructs like:
if cmd; then fi
{ }
Add a colon dummy command, except in a test that verifies that such empty
lists do not cause crashes when used as a function definition.
In our implementation and most others, a break or continue in a dot script
can break or continue a loop outside the dot script. This should cause all
further commands in the dot script to be skipped. However, cmdloop() did not
know about this and continued to parse and execute commands from the dot
script.
As described in the man page, a return in a dot script in a function returns
from the function, not only from the dot script. There was a similar issue
as with break and continue. In various other shells, the return appears to
return from the dot script, but POSIX seems not very clear about this.
The buffer for generated pathnames could be too small in some cases. It
happened to be always at least PATH_MAX long, so there was never an overflow
if the resulting pathnames would be usable.
This bug may be abused if a script subjects input from an untrusted source
to pathname generation, which a bad idea anyhow. Most shell scripts do not
work on untrusted data. secteam@ says no advisory is necessary.
PR: bin/148733
Reported by: Changming Sun snnn119 at gmail com
MFC after: 10 days
This makes a difference if there is a command substitution.
To make this work, evalstring() has been changed to set exitstatus to 0 if
no command was executed (the string contained only whitespace).
Example:
eval $(false); echo $?
should print 0.
If an ; or & token was followed by an EOF token, pending here-documents were
left uninitialized. Execution would crash, either in the main shell process
for literal here-documents or in a child process for expanded
here-documents. In the latter case the problem is hard to detect apart from
the core dumps and log messages.
Side effect: slightly different retries on inputs where EOF is not
persistent.
Note that tools/regression/bin/sh/parser/heredoc6.0 still causes a similar
crash in a child process. The text passed to eval is malformed and should be
rejected.
expansion.
The comma operator is not listed in POSIX.1-2008 XCU 1.1.2.1 Arithmetic
Precision and Operations (referenced by XCU 2.6.4 Arithmetic Expansion) and
is therefore not required.
Example (in interactive mode):
cat <<EOF && )
The next command typed caused sh to segfault, because the state for the here
document was not reset.
Like parser_temp, this uses the fact that the parser is not re-entered.
If a command substitution contains a newline token, this no longer starts
here documents of outer commands. This way, we follow POSIX's idea of the
command substitution being a separate script more closely. It also matches
other shells better and is consistent with newline characters in quotes not
starting here documents.
The extension tested in parser/heredoc3.0 ($(cat <<EOF)\ntext\nEOF\n)
continues to be supported.
In particular, this change allows things like
cat <<EOF && echo `pwd`
(a `` command substitution after a here document)
which formerly silently used an empty file as the here document, because the
EOF of the inner command "pwd" also forced an empty here document.
Although "--" historically has not been required to be recognized for
certain special builtins that do not take options in POSIX, some other
implementations recognize options for them, requiring scripts to use "--" or
avoid operands starting with "-".
Operands starting with "-" can be avoided with eval by prepending a space,
and cannot occur with break, continue, exit, return and shift as they only
take numbers, nor with times as it does not take operands. With . and exec,
avoiding "-" is not so easy as it may require reimplementing the PATH
search; therefore the current proposal for POSIX is to require recognition
of "--" for them.
We continue to accept other strings starting with "-" as operands to . and
exec, and also "--" if it is alone to . (which would otherwise be invalid
anyway).
