code in ipl.s and icu_ipl.s that used them was removed when the
interrupt thread system was committed. Debuggers also knew about
Xresume* because these labels hide the real names of the interrupt
handlers (Xintr*), and debuggers need to special-case interrupt
handlers to get the interrupt frame.
Both gdb and ddb will now use the Xintr* and Xfastintr* symbols to
detect interrupt frames. Fast interrupt frames were never identified
correctly before, so this fixes the problem of the running stack
frame getting lost in a ddb or gdb trace generated from a fast
interrupt - e.g. when debugging a simple infinite loop in the kernel
using a serial console, the frame containing the loop would never
appear in a gdb or ddb trace.
Reviewed by: jhb, bde
are linking against does not have basename(). There is a buffer overflow
bug in lib/libc/gen/basename.c rev 1.1. There is no way for us to test
what revision of basename() we have in libc, thus this change.
Requested by: ru
misuse of /usr/src/include headers. This REALLY fixes
the 20010919 src/UPDATING entry.
With this patch the 4.2-RELEASE box was able to survive
the 5.0-CURRENT "make world".
Beat over the head with this patch: obrien
The version of the kernel has no bearing on what is in libc.
We now search for basename in libc to determin if we need to include
the libiberty version in the build.
This is all still a bit bogus as it will (like the sysctl method) cause
basename.o to be linked into the cross-build as well as the host build. It
would probably be better to test if we were doing the initial host build and
unconditionally include that. Once we've generated the target libc we know
that basename is available. (maybe test for $TOOLS_PREFIX or something).
Submitted by: peter
Note ALL MODULES MUST BE RECOMPILED
make the kernel aware that there are smaller units of scheduling than the
process. (but only allow one thread per process at this time).
This is functionally equivalent to teh previousl -current except
that there is a thread associated with each process.
Sorry john! (your next MFC will be a doosie!)
Reviewed by: peter@freebsd.org, dillon@freebsd.org
X-MFC after: ha ha ha ha
