This effectively mirrors our libc implementation, but with minor fudging --
name needs to be copied in from userspace, so we just copy it straight into
stack-allocated memfd_name into the correct position rather than allocating
memory that needs to be cleaned up.
The sealing-related fcntl(2) commands, F_GET_SEALS and F_ADD_SEALS, have
also been implemented now that we support them.
Note that this implementation is still not quite at feature parity w.r.t.
the actual Linux version; some caveats, from my foggy memory:
- Need to implement SHM_GROW_ON_WRITE, default for memfd (in progress)
- LTP wants the memfd name exposed to fdescfs
- Linux allows open() of an fdescfs fd with O_TRUNC to truncate after dup.
(?)
Interested parties can install and run LTP from ports (devel/linux-ltp) to
confirm any fixes.
PR: 240874
Reviewed by: kib, trasz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21845
Submitted by: Bora Özarslan <borako.ozarslan@gmail.com>
Submitted by: Yang Wang <2333@outlook.jp>
Reviewed by: markj
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19917
syscall is to query the CPU number and the NUMA domain the calling
thread is currently running on. The third argument is ignored.
It doesn't do anything regarding scheduling - it's literally
just a way to query the current state, without any guarantees
you won't get rescheduled an opcode later.
This unbreaks Java from CentOS 8
(java-11-openjdk-11.0.5.10-0.el8_0.x86_64).
Reviewed by: kib
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22972
copy_file_range(2) is implemented natively since r350315, make it available
for Linux binaries too.
Reviewed by: kib (mentor), trasz (previous version)
Approved by: kib (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22959
over the usual fsync(2).
This silences some warnings when running "apt-get upgrade".
Reviewed by: brooks, emaste
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22371
Just return EINVAL if flags != 0. The Linux man page documents one
case of EINVAL as "The filesystem does not support one of the flags in
flags."
After r351723 userland binaries will try using new system calls.
Reported by: mjg
Reviewed by: mjg, trasz
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21590