install of Postfix fails since Postfix 1 is picked from INDEX instead
of Postfix 2.
The problem is that the package_add function matches multiple Postfix
packages and then installs a "random" version (the last one found in
INDEX). This does not occur with a CD-ROM install since there is only
one Postfix package on the CD-ROM.
The correct solution to this would be to check the origin field from
INDEX instead of the package name, but due to the way sysinstall is
made that is not trivial, so instead work around the problem by
hard-coding the Postfix major and minor revision (for the current
stable version) to install directly into the package_add call.
PR: misc/65426
Reported by: Harold Kachelmyer <bugs@princessharold.net>
Approved by: trhodes
that actually need it. This makes it easier for a platform porter to
find the files that may need tweaking to support whatever MD specific
partitioning is needed. It also helps to prevent that the libdisk API
gets exposed and/or used where it's not needed.
- Don't look for partitions inside a FreeBSD chunk on ia64 when mounting
the filesystems just before the chroot and install.
- Write entries out to /etc/fstab for filesystems that aren't inside a
FreeBSD chunk, but are a top-level chunk under the disk.
(Lite Edition) respectively. These "lite" packages are streamlined to
provide users with the core essentials for each desktop and to fit on the
release disc 1.
Approved by: re (scottl)
permitting the administrator to select a securelevel top operate
at. Include a helpfile summarizing some of the information from
init(8). This allows for explicit configuration of securelevels,
which was previously implicit in Security Profile selection.
Currently, there are no checkboxes for the active securelevel,
because sysinstall's facilities for deriving "current settings"
from rc.conf may use only one variable, not two, and I opted for
the simplest approach at this point.
Approved by: re (scottl)
selection is used to drive two configuration parameters:
(1) Default enable/disable for sshd
(2) Default enable/disable for securelevels
Replace this with an explicit choice to enable/disable sshd. A
follow-up commit will add a configuration option to the Security
post-install configuration menu to set the securelevel in rc.conf
explicitly. This should reduce the level of foot-shooting associated
with accidental enabling of securelevels, make the nature and
implications of the securelevel configuration options more explicit,
as well as make the choice to enable/disable sshd more explicit.
Approved by: re (scottl)
(1) Don't modify the configuration of the NFS server as a result of
selecting a profile. We already explicitly prompt for the NFS
server configuration during install, and the user may not get
much advance notice that we're turning it off again. Instead,
use profiles (for better or for worse) only for security tuning.
(2) Don't modify the sendmail setting as part of the security profile:
use the default from /etc/defaults/rc.conf rather than explicitly
specifying. Note that the default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf is
more conservative than the explicit rc.conf entry added by
sysinstall during install, as it does not permit SMTP delivery.
(3) Update "congratulations on your profile" text to reflect these
changes.
Note that security profiles now affect only the securelevel and sshd
settings. My leaning would be to make sshd an explicit configuration
option, move securelevels to the security menu, and drop security
profiles entirely. However, that requires more plumbing of sendmail
than I'm currently willing to invest.
We may want to add a "permit SMTP delivery" question to the install
process.
- Add 'enable_exim="YES"' to rc.conf(5)
- Use the default exim configuration file from the port
- When using sendmail, disable some more scripts that use sendmail specific
parameters
- Have sysinstall tweak mailer.conf(5) substitution
- Use 'N' flag for newsyslog(8)
Submitted by: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Reviewed by: sheldonh, simon
Tested by: myself (trhodes) and submitter
This option adds Postfix and Exim to the list, however, qmail is not added
due to license restrictions.
Collaborated with: Simon L. Nielsen <simon@nitro.dk>
Reviewed by: jhb, re@, -audit.
the two GNOME 1-based alternatives.
While here, note that a majority of the items in this menu are not
sentences, and remove trailing dots to make the remainder consistent.
Reviewed by: marcus
Approved by: re (bmah)
With this change there's no a priori difference between EFI and
FAT partitions. With this change and the corresponding change to
libdisk, we can create EFI partitions, just like regular FAT
partitions.
all facilities that previously relied on /proc have been rewritten
to use ptrace(). procfs has presented a substantial security
hazard for years, with several user->root compromises in the last
few years. Procfs will continue to be available but will require
administrator intervention to use.
Reviewed by: scottl, jedgar, mike, tmm
o Move nfs_reserved_port_only out of security profiles (where it was
set somewhat improperly) to the Security options menu directly.
Previously, the variable was set to true for Moderate, but not for
Extreme, which is at best inconsistent.
o Update the Security Profiles help file to remove reference to the
NFS reserved port.
o Note that the kernel currently defaults the sysctl to '0', but
sysinstall has changed it to '1' as a default as of late; however,
rc.conf sets the value to NO as the default. This change brings
them relatively into sync.
Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs
and pull configSecurityProfile under that menu. Add a menu option
to determine whether LOMAC is enabled at boot. Probably, eventually,
many of the 'Security Profile' menu choices should be pulled out
independently into the Security Menu, so as to make them individually
selectable.
Sponsored by: DARPA, NAI Labs
Add a timestamp to the comment so that it's possible to see when
changes were made.
e.g.:
# -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Aug 15 18:10:20 2001
conservative default, and actually prompt specifically for inetd rather
than handling it as a side effect of the security profile. Update the
help file to reflect this change.
o Rename "Fascist" to "Extreme" in the source code, to match the names
presented to the user.
o Remove portmap and inetd from profile management. Portmap is now
disabled by default, but automatically turned on if a feature requires
it (such as NFS, etc).
This is an MFC candidate for 4.4-RELEASE.
Reviewed by: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Approved by: re@FreeBSD.org
MFC after: 2 days
post-install config, reduce the potential confusion from the existence
of both configTTYs and configTtys by renaming configTTYs to
configEtcTtys. While this is not a C naming conflict, it was probably
a poor choice of names on my part.
system installation process. This allows users installing via serial
console to enable serial console login during the installation
process using an un-customized install. The user is not prompted to
modify /etc/ttys during a normal install, but is offered the
opportunity during post-install configuration.
- Introduce configTTYs(), which describes the benefits of editing
/etc/ttys, and asks for confirmation before spawning the editor.
- add configTTYs to the post-install configuration, as well as to
the global configuration index.
by providing the opportunity to edit inetd.conf during the system
installation process. The following modifications were made:
(1) Expand the Anonymous FTP description dialog to indicate that inetd
and ftpd must be enabled before it can be used.
(2) Introduce a new configInetd() pair of dialogs, the first describing
inetd, giving a couple of examples of services that require it, and
hinting at potential risk, then asking the user if they wish to
enable it. The second indicates that inetd.conf must be configured
to enabled specific services, and asks if the user would like to
load inetd.conf into the editor to modify it. Add this
configuration action to the index.
There are some further improvements that might be considered:
(1) Provide a more inetd.conf-specific configuration tool that speaks
inetd.conf(5). However, this is made difficult by the "yet another
configuration format" nature of inetd.conf, as well as its use of
commenting to disable services, rather than an in-syntax way to
disable a service without commenting it out. Submissions here
would probably be welcome.
(2) There's some overlap between settings in the somewhat obtuse
Security Profile mechanism and other settings, including the inetd
setting, and NFS server configuration. As features become
individually tunable, they should probably be removed from the
security profile mechanism. Otherwise, somewhat counter-intuitively,
sysinstall (in practice) queries multiple times whether inetd, nfsd,
etc, should be enabled/disabled. A possible future direction might
be to drive profiles not by degree of paranoia, rather, the set
of services desired. Or simply to remove the Security Profile
mechanism and resort to feature-driven configuration.
Reviewed by: imp, chris, jake, nate, -arch, -stable
