Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander V. Chernikov
a287a973e3 Switch rtsock code to using newly-create rib_action() KPI call.
This simplifies the code and allows to further split rtentry and nexthop,
 removing one of the blockers for multipath code introduction, described in
 D24141.

Reviewed by:	ae
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25192
2020-06-10 07:46:22 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
41e66f4eca Add rib subscription API.
Currently there is no easy way of subscribing for the routing table changes.
The only existing way is to set ifa_rtrequest callback in the each protocol
 ifaddr, which is not convenient or extandable.

This change provides generic notification subscription mechanism, that will
 replace current ifa_rtrequest one and allow other applications such as
 accelerated routing lookup modules subscribe for the changes.

In particular, this change provides 2 hooks: 1) synchronous one
 (RIB_NOTIFY_IMMEDIATE), called under RIB_WLOCK, which ensures exact
 ordering of the changes and 2) async one, (RIB_NOTIFY_DELAYED)
 that is called after the change w/o holding locks. The latter one does not
 provide any notification ordering guarantee.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25070
2020-06-01 21:52:24 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
da187ddb3d * Add rib_<add|del|change>_route() functions to manipulate the routing table.
The main driver for the change is the need to improve notification mechanism.
Currently callers guess the operation data based on the rtentry structure
 returned in case of successful operation result. There are two problems with
 this appoach. First is that it doesn't provide enough information for the
 upcoming multipath changes, where rtentry refers to a new nexthop group,
 and there is no way of guessing which paths were added during the change.
 Second is that some rtentry fields can change during notification and
 protecting from it by requiring customers to unlock rtentry is not desired.

Additionally, as the consumers such as rtsock do know which operation they
 request in advance, making explicit add/change/del versions of the functions
 makes sense, especially given the functions don't share a lot of code.

With that in mind, introduce rib_cmd_info notification structure and
 rib_<add|del|change>_route() functions, with mandatory rib_cmd_info pointer.
 It will be used in upcoming generalized notifications.

* Move definitions of the new functions and some other functions/structures
 used for the routing table manipulation to a separate header file,
 net/route/route_ctl.h. net/route.h is a frequently used file included in
 ~140 places in kernel, and 90% of the users don't need these definitions.

Reviewed by:		ae
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25067
2020-06-01 20:49:42 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
e7403d0230 Revert r361704, it accidentally committed merged D25067 and D25070. 2020-06-01 20:40:40 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
79674562b8 * Add rib_<add|del|change>_route() functions to manipulate the routing table.
The main driver for the change is the need to improve notification mechanism.
Currently callers guess the operation data based on the rtentry structure
 returned in case of successful operation result. There are two problems with
 this appoach. First is that it doesn't provide enough information for the
 upcoming multipath changes, where rtentry refers to a new nexthop group,
 and there is no way of guessing which paths were added during the change.
 Second is that some rtentry fields can change during notification and
 protecting from it by requiring customers to unlock rtentry is not desired.

Additionally, as the consumers such as rtsock do know which operation they
 request in advance, making explicit add/change/del versions of the functions
 makes sense, especially given the functions don't share a lot of code.

With that in mind, introduce rib_cmd_info notification structure and
 rib_<add|del|change>_route() functions, with mandatory rib_cmd_info pointer.
 It will be used in upcoming generalized notifications.

* Move definitions of the new functions and some other functions/structures
 used for the routing table manipulation to a separate header file,
 net/route/route_ctl.h. net/route.h is a frequently used file included in
 ~140 places in kernel, and 90% of the users don't need these definitions.

Reviewed by:	ae
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25067
2020-06-01 20:32:02 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
4d2c2509f2 Move <add|del|change>_route() functions to route_ctl.c in preparation of
multipath control plane changed described in D24141.

Currently route.c contains core routing init/teardown functions, route table
 manipulation functions and various helper functions, resulting in >2KLOC
 file in total. This change moves most of the route table manipulation parts
 to a dedicated file, simplifying planned multipath changes and making
 route.c more manageable.

Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24870
2020-05-23 19:06:57 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
e7d8af4f65 Move route_temporal.c and route_var.h to net/route.
Nexthop objects implementation, defined in r359823,
 introduced sys/net/route directory intended to hold all
 routing-related code. Move recently-introduced route_temporal.c and
 private route_var.h header there.

Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24597
2020-04-28 19:14:09 +00:00
Alexander V. Chernikov
a666325282 Introduce nexthop objects and new routing KPI.
This is the foundational change for the routing subsytem rearchitecture.
 More details and goals are available in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24141 .

This patch introduces concept of nexthop objects and new nexthop-based
 routing KPI.

Nexthops are objects, containing all necessary information for performing
 the packet output decision. Output interface, mtu, flags, gw address goes
 there. For most of the cases, these objects will serve the same role as
 the struct rtentry is currently serving.
Typically there will be low tens of such objects for the router even with
 multiple BGP full-views, as these objects will be shared between routing
 entries. This allows to store more information in the nexthop.

New KPI:

struct nhop_object *fib4_lookup(uint32_t fibnum, struct in_addr dst,
  uint32_t scopeid, uint32_t flags, uint32_t flowid);
struct nhop_object *fib6_lookup(uint32_t fibnum, const struct in6_addr *dst6,
  uint32_t scopeid, uint32_t flags, uint32_t flowid);

These 2 function are intended to replace all all flavours of
 <in_|in6_>rtalloc[1]<_ign><_fib>, mpath functions  and the previous
 fib[46]-generation functions.

Upon successful lookup, they return nexthop object which is guaranteed to
 exist within current NET_EPOCH. If longer lifetime is desired, one can
 specify NHR_REF as a flag and get a referenced version of the nexthop.
 Reference semantic closely resembles rtentry one, allowing sed-style conversion.

Additionally, another 2 functions are introduced to support uRPF functionality
 inside variety of our firewalls. Their primary goal is to hide the multipath
 implementation details inside the routing subsystem, greatly simplifying
 firewalls implementation:

int fib4_lookup_urpf(uint32_t fibnum, struct in_addr dst, uint32_t scopeid,
  uint32_t flags, const struct ifnet *src_if);
int fib6_lookup_urpf(uint32_t fibnum, const struct in6_addr *dst6, uint32_t scopeid,
  uint32_t flags, const struct ifnet *src_if);

All functions have a separate scopeid argument, paving way to eliminating IPv6 scope
 embedding and allowing to support IPv4 link-locals in the future.

Structure changes:
 * rtentry gets new 'rt_nhop' pointer, slightly growing the overall size.
 * rib_head gets new 'rnh_preadd' callback pointer, slightly growing overall sz.

Old KPI:
During the transition state old and new KPI will coexists. As there are another 4-5
 decent-sized conversion patches, it will probably take a couple of weeks.
To support both KPIs, fields not required by the new KPI (most of rtentry) has to be
 kept, resulting in the temporary size increase.
Once conversion is finished, rtentry will notably shrink.

More details:
* architectural overview: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24141
* list of the next changes: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24232

Reviewed by:	ae,glebius(initial version)
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24232
2020-04-12 14:30:00 +00:00