implementation in case default one provided by rtld is
not suitable.
Consolidate various identical MD lock implementation into
a single file using appropriate machine/atomic.h.
Approved by: re (scottl)
objects.
Programs such as sshd depend on two pointers to the same function being
equal in a given process. However, the current ia64 implementation
ensures that they're equal when both the pointers are instantiated in
the same ELF object. The attached patch ensures that they're equal
irrespective of where they're instantiated.
Reviewed by marcel@ (mentor) and kan@
for the DT_IA64_PLT_RESERVE dynamic table entry. When a shared object
does not have any PLT relocations, the linker apparently doesn't find
it necessary to actually reserve the space for the BOR (Bind On
Reference) entries as pointed to by the DTE. As a result, relocatable
data in the PLT was overwritten, causing some unexpected control flow
with annoyingly predictable outcome: coredump.
To reproduce:
% echo 'int main() { return 0; }' > foo.c
% cc -o foo foo.c -lxpg4
They provided little benefit (if any) and they caused some problems
in OpenOffice, at least in post-KSE -current and perhaps in other
environments too. The nanosleep calls prevented the profiling timer
from advancing during the spinloops, thereby preventing the thread
scheduler from ever pre-empting the spinning thread. Alexander
Kabaev diagnosed this problem, Martin Blapp helped with testing,
and Matt Dillon provided some helpful suggestions.
This is a short-term fix for a larger problem. The use of spinlocking
isn't guaranteed to work in all cases. For example, if the spinning
thread has higher priority than all other threads, it may never be
pre-empted, and the thread holding the lock may never progress far
enough to release the lock. On the other hand, spinlocking is the
only locking that can work with an arbitrary unknown threads package.
I have some ideas for a much better fix in the longer term. It
would eliminate all locking inside the dynamic linker by making it
safe for symbol lookups and lazy binding to proceed in parallel
with a call to dlopen or dlclose. This means that the only mutual
exclusion needed would be to prevent multiple simultaneous calls
to dlopen and/or dlclose. That mutual exclusion could be put into
the native pthreads library. Applications using foreign threads
packages would have to make their own arrangements to ensure that
they did not have multiple threads in dlopen and/or dlclose -- a
reasonable requirement in my opinion.
MFC after: 3 days
Untested (testing request went unanswered), but sparc64 is not expected to
cause problems. IA64 is not expected to cause problems but the patch was
slightly more complex so the possibility exists.
Approved by: jdp
o Set st_shndx for sym_zero to SHN_UNDEF instead of SHN_ABS.
This gives us something to reliably test against.
o For weak references to undefined sysmbols (as indicated by
having st_shndx equals SHN_UNDEF) in the context of OPDs,
the address of the OPD is to be zero, not the address of
the function it contains.
o For weak references to undefined symbols in all other cases
(only DIR64LSB at this time), the actual relocated value is
to be zero, not the value prior to relocating.
Roughly speaking, weak references to undefined symbols are no-ops.
Tested on: i386, ia64
objects were not being correctly set to zero. Instead, the function
descriptor pointer was set to the load address of the .so object. This
caused gcc generated binaries to segfault on exit when crtbegin.asm's
_fini code tested the __cxa_finalize() function pointer for zero.
This is a bit of a hack because of a problem nearby workaround for
find_symdef and its quirks (failures) for local symbols. This still
needs to be fixed.
DT_INIT and DT_FINI tags pointed to fptr records. In 2.11.2, it points
to the actuall address of the function. On IA64 you cannot just take
an address of a function, store it in a function pointer variable and
call it.. the function pointers point to a fptr data block that has the
target gp and address in it. This is absolutely necessary for using
the in-tree binutils toolchain, but (unfortunately) will not work with
old shared libraries. Save your old ld-elf.so.1 if you want to use
old ones still. Do not mix-and-match.
This is a no-op change for i386 and alpha.
Reviewed by: dfr
