In Linux, ksize() gets the actual amount of memory allocated for a given
object. This commit adds malloc_usable_size() to FreeBSD KPI which does
the same. It also maps LinuxKPI ksize() to newly created function.
ksize() function is used by drm-kmod.
Reviewed by: hselasky, kib
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26215
These functions were introduced before UMA started ensuring that freed
memory gets placed in domain-local caches. They no longer serve any
purpose since UMA now provides their functionality by default. Remove
them to simplyify the kernel memory allocator interfaces a bit.
Reviewed by: cem, kib
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25937
Key and cookie management typically wants to
avoid information leaks by explicitly zeroing
before free. This routine simplifies that by
permitting consumers to do so without carrying
the size around.
Reviewed by: jeff@, jhb@
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22790
Remove malloc_domain(9) and most other _domain KPIs added in r327900.
The new functions allow the caller to specify a general NUMA domain
selection policy, rather than specifically requesting an allocation from
a specific domain. The latter policy tends to interact poorly with
M_WAITOK, resulting in situations where a caller is blocked indefinitely
because the specified domain is depleted. Most existing consumers of
the _domain KPIs are converted to instead use a DOMAINSET_PREF() policy,
in which we fall back to other domains to satisfy the allocation
request.
This change also defines a set of DOMAINSET_FIXED() policies, which
only permit allocations from the specified domain.
Discussed with: gallatin, jeff
Reported and tested by: pho (previous version)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17418
Most kernel memory that is allocated after boot does not need to be
executable. There are a few exceptions. For example, kernel modules
do need executable memory, but they don't use UMA or malloc(9). The
BPF JIT compiler also needs executable memory and did use malloc(9)
until r317072.
(Note that a side effect of r316767 was that the "small allocation"
path in UMA on amd64 already returned non-executable memory. This
meant that some calls to malloc(9) or the UMA zone(9) allocator could
return executable memory, while others could return non-executable
memory. This change makes the behavior consistent.)
This change makes malloc(9) return non-executable memory unless the new
M_EXEC flag is specified. After this change, the UMA zone(9) allocator
will always return non-executable memory, and a KASSERT will catch
attempts to use the M_EXEC flag to allocate executable memory using
uma_zalloc() or its variants.
Allocations that do need executable memory have various choices. They
may use the M_EXEC flag to malloc(9), or they may use a different VM
interfact to obtain executable pages.
Now that malloc(9) again allows executable allocations, this change also
reverts most of r317072.
PR: 228927
Reviewed by: alc, kib, markj, jhb (previous version)
Sponsored by: Netflix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15691
Additionally, move the overflow check logic out to WOULD_OVERFLOW() for
consumers to have a common means of testing for overflowing allocations.
WOULD_OVERFLOW() should be a secondary check -- on 64-bit platforms, just
because an allocation won't overflow size_t does not mean it is a sane size
to request. Callers should be imposing reasonable allocation limits far,
far, below overflow.
Discussed with: emaste, jhb, kp
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Similar to calloc() the mallocarray() function checks for integer
overflows before allocating memory.
It does not zero memory, unless the M_ZERO flag is set.
Reviewed by: pfg, vangyzen (previous version), imp (previous version)
Obtained from: OpenBSD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13766
critical section.
uma_zalloc_arg()/uma_zalloc_free() may acquire a sleepable lock on the
zone. The malloc() family of functions may call uma_zalloc_arg() or
uma_zalloc_free().
The malloc(9) man page currently claims that free() will never sleep.
It also implies that the malloc() family of functions will not sleep
when called with M_NOWAIT. However, it is more correct to say that
these functions will not sleep indefinitely. Indeed, they may acquire
a sleepable lock. However, a developer may overlook this restriction
because the WITNESS check that catches attempts to call the malloc()
family of functions within a critical section is inconsistenly
applied.
This change clarifies the language of the malloc(9) man page to clarify
the restriction against calling the malloc() family of functions
while in a critical section or holding a spin lock. It also adds
KASSERTs at appropriate points to make the enforcement of this
restriction more consistent.
PR: 204633
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4197
Reviewed by: markj
Approved by: gnn (mentor)
Sponsored by: Juniper Networks
While beeing here also correct the following:
- list missing macros in the header
- document MALLOC_DEFINE and MALLOC_DECLARE in the SYNOPSIS section
- document additional include requirements for MALLOC_DEFINE
- M_NOWAIT is not 0 anymore
- remove rotted diagnostic messages
with vnode interlocks held.
Emphasize that users need to be careful with malloc flags versus mbuf
flags.
Remove stale portion in vnode.9 about v_tag. We don't have it anylonger.
Submitted by: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com>
cd src/share; find man[1-9] -type f|xargs perl -pi -e 's/[ \t]+$//'
BTW, what editors are the culprits? I'm using vim and it shows
me whitespace at EOL in troff files with a thick blue block...
Reviewed by: Silence from cvs diff -b
MFC after: 7 days
