Rather than mentioning the requirement for 4.x binaries but not
explaining why (it was assuming an upgrade from 4.x to 5.0-current),
explain when compat options are needed (for running existing host
binaries) in a more general way while using a more modern example
(COMPAT_FREEBSD11 for 11.x binaries). While here, explicitly mention
that a GENERIC kernel should always work.
Reported by: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
Reviewed by: imp
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18740
The first part of the mips pruning has been commited. This part
is uncontested. Fix the date in the UPDATING file to reflect when
I made the commit. The contested parts will be committed (or not)
once those discussions complete.
This was useful in bring up. However, it causes more issues than the
support is worth (64-bit atomics being chief among them).
Discussed on: freebsd-mips@
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18543
relevant and is unused. It's also getting in the way of progress in
some admittedly minor ways. Better to retire it to reduce the burden
on the project.
Discussed on: freebsd-mips@
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18543
It has passed an exp run on amd64 and i386, and has testing on arm64. On
other architectures it is expected to run, however it can be disabled by
building world with -DWITHOUT_BSD_CRTBEGIN.
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
- Adding a note to UPDATING
- Adding a note to the history section of the manpage ctm.1
- Adding a message printed to STDERR to the ctm program
This version is meant for release in FreeBSD-12.0 and should remain in
FreeBSD-12 over its life-time.
A follow-up commit will remove ctm from -CURRENT after the MFC to 12
has happened.
Approved by: imp, rgrimes, bcr (man-page)
MFC after: 3 days
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17969
Update messaging for which drm module to install. Add guidance on what
hardware is supported (which should be copied into the release
notes). Note: the in tree drivers are abandonware. There has been no
organized support for them for many years, and the plan is to still
remove them for all but arm once the transition to drm-*kmod is
complete. Also note that WITHOUT_MODULE_DRM and WITHOUT_MODULE_DRM2
should generally be added to src.conf for anybody using the drm-*kmod
ports. That will become default in 13 soon, however.
Approved by: FreeBSD Graphics Team
Relnotes: Yes
MFC After: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17451
- Update OpenSSL to version 1.1.1.
- Update Kerberos/Heimdal API for OpenSSL 1.1.1 compatibility.
- Bump __FreeBSD_version.
Approved by: re (kib)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This is a step in the process of easing migration into the new world order
of DRM drivers. Strongly encourage users towards loading DRM modules via
rc.conf(5) instead of loader.conf(5) by failing the load from loader(8).
Users so inclined may wipe out the blacklist via module_blacklist="" in
loader.conf(5), and it is expected that these modules will eventually be
removed from the blacklist. They may still be loaded as dependencies of
other modules or explicitly via the loader prompt, but this should not be a
major problem.
Approved by: re (rgrimes)
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16914
The workaround described in the 20180530 entry is no longer required.
Amend that entry and add a new 20180530 entry noting lld is the
default amd64 linker.
Reviewed by: imp
Approved by: re (kib)
notices the missing ntpd user and refers to UPDATING. This change makes
it more clear which aspect of UPDATING is important for the ntpd change.
PR: 231334
Approved by: re (gjb)
given in random(4).
This includes updating of the relevant man pages, and no-longer-used
harvesting parameters.
Ensure that the pseudo-unit-test still does something useful, now also
with the "other" algorithm instead of Yarrow.
PR: 230870
Reviewed by: cem
Approved by: so(delphij,gtetlow)
Approved by: re(marius)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16898
Revert r338177, r338176, r338175, r338174, r338172
After long consultations with re@, core members and mmacy, revert
these changes. Followup changes will be made to mark them as
deprecated and prent a message about where to find the up-to-date
driver. Followup commits will be made to make this clear in the
installer. Followup commits to reduce POLA in ways we're still
exploring.
It's anticipated that after the freeze, this will be removed in
13-current (with the residual of the drm2 code copied to
sys/arm/dev/drm2 for the TEGRA port's use w/o the intel or
radeon drivers).
Due to the impending freeze, there was no formal core vote for
this. I've been talking to different core members all day, as well as
Matt Macey and Glen Barber. Nobody is completely happy, all are
grudgingly going along with this. Work is in progress to mitigate
the negative effects as much as possible.
Requested by: re@ (gjb, rgrimes)
As discussed on the MLs drm2 conflicts with the ports' version and there
is no upstream for most if not all of drm. Both have been merged in to
a single port.
Users on powerpc, 32-bit hardware, or with GPUs predating Radeon
and i915 will need to install the graphics/drm-legacy-kmod. All
other users should be able to use one of the LinuxKPI-based ports:
graphics/drm-stable-kmod, graphics/drm-next-kmod, graphics/drm-devel-kmod.
MFC: never
Approved by: core@
Turns out there was a hidden dependency we hasn't counted upon. The
host load /boot/userboot.so to boot the VMs it runs. This means that
the change to lua meant suddently that nobody could run their older
VMs because LUA wasn't in 10.0, last month's HardenedBSD, 11.2 or
whatever. Even more than for the /boot/loader* binaries, we need a
good coexistance strategy for this. While that's being designed and
implemented, drop back to always 4th for userboot.so. This will fail
safe in all but the most extreme environments (but lua-only hacks
to .lua files won't be processes in VMs until we fix it).
Differential Review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16805
After years in the making, lualoader is ready to make its debut. Both
flavors of loader are still built by default, and may be installed as
/boot/loader or /boot/loader.efi as appropriate either by manually creating
hard links or using LOADER_DEFAULT_INTERP as documented in build(7).
Discussed with: imp
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16795
--color may be set to one of: 'auto', 'always', and 'never'.
'auto' is the default behavior- output colors only if -G or COLORTERM are
set, and only if stdout is a tty.
'always' is a new behavior- output colors always. termcap(5) will be
consulted unless TERM is unset or not a recognized terminal, in which case
ls(1) will fall back to explicitly outputting ANSI escape sequences.
'never' to turn off any environment variable and -G usage.
Reviewed by: cem, 0mp (both modulo last-minute manpage changes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16741
The jedec_ts(4) driver has been marked as deprecated in stable/11, and is
now being removed from -HEAD. Add a notice in UPDATING, and update the few
remaining references (regarding jedec_dimm(4)'s compatibility and history)
to reflect the fact that jedec_ts(4) is now deleted.
Reviewed by: avg
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16537
The latter matches the rest of the tree better [0]. The UPDATING entry has
been updated to reflect this, and the new tunable is now documented in
loader(8) [1].
Reported by: imp [0], Shawn Webb [1]
As noted in UDPATING, the new loader tunable efi.rt_disabled may be used to
disable EFIRT at runtime. It should have no effect if you are not booted via
UEFI boot.
MFC after: 6 weeks
loading.
If we are booting in a conforming UEFI Boot Manager Environment, then
use the BootCurrent variable to find the BootXXXX we're using. Once we
find that, then if it contains more than one EFI_DEVICE_PATH in its
what to boot section, try to use the last one as the kernel to
load. This will also set the default root partition as well. If
there's only one path, or if there's an error along the way, assume
that nothing specific was specified and revert to the old
algorithm. If something was specified, but not found, then fail the
boot. Otherwise you that, specific thing. On FreeBSD, this can be set
using efibootmgr -l <loader> -k <kernel>. We try a few variations of
kernel to cope with the fact that UEFI comes from a DOS world where
paths might be upper case and/or contain back-slashes.
Note: In an ideal world, we'd work out where we are in chain loading
by looking at the passed-in image handle and doing name
matching. However, that's unreliable since at least boot1.efi booted
images don't have that, hence the assumption that loader.efi needs to
load the last thing on the list, if possible.
The reason we fail for something specific is so that we can fully
participate in the UEFI Boot Manager Protocol and fail over to the
next item in the list of BootOrder choices when something goes wrong
at this stage.
This implements was was talked about in freebsd-arch@ last year
https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3576+0+archive/2017/freebsd-arch/20171022.freebsd-arch
and documented in full (after changed resulting from the discussion) in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aK9IqF-60JPEbUeSAUAkYjF2W_8EnmczFs6RqCT90Jg/edit#
although one or two minor details may have been modified in this
implementation to make it work, and the ZFS MEDIA PATH extension isn't
implemented. This does not yet move things to ESP:\efi\freebsd\loader.efi.
RelNotes: Yes
Sponsored by: Netflix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16403
zfsloader as a hard link. While newer ones do, the whole point of the
link was to transition to the new world order smoothly. A hard link is
less flexible, but it works and will result in fewer bumps. Adjust
UPDATING entry to match.
This variable has been given the name "loader_env.disabled" as it's the
primary way most people will have an MD environment. This restores the
previously-default behavior of ignoring the loader(8) environment, which may
be useful for vendor distributions or other scenarios where inheriting the
loader environment may be considered a security issue or potentially
breaking of a more locked-down environment.
As the change to config(5) indicates, disabling the loader environment
should not be a choice made lightly since it may provide ACPI hints and
other useful things that the system can rely on to boot.
An UPDATING entry has been added to mention an upgrade path for those that
may have relied on the previous behavior.
Discussed with: bde
Relnotes: yes (maybe)
