If we fail to open one of the files in the file listing, we still need
to advance `rec` along with `argv` so that the checksum we're checking
against lines up with the file we're hashing.
Tests added both for the -c flag, as well as the -b and -t modes of
the *sum programs.
PR: 267722
Reviewed by: emaste (earlier version)
MFC after: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37374
While there, remove .Tn from man pages.
Also remove an obsolete comment about the 80386.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Klara, Inc.
Reviewed by: kevans, allanjude
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D38373
The BSD style commands (with names not ending in "sum") ignored the -c
options and the passed digest value when invoked with -q.
The man page stated that -q causes only the calculated digest to be
printed, but did not consider the case of both the -q and -c being
used in combination.
Since there is no warning that -c will be ignored when the -q option
is used, users night (and did) expect that the exit code would reflect
the matching of the calculated digest and the argument passed with -c.
This update implements and documents this expected behavior.
PR: 265461
Reported by: Dmitrij <bugs.freebsd@1fff.net>
MFC after: 2 weeks
The previous changes that added support for the coreutils -c option
modified the output generated by passing -r to match that of the
coreutils versions. The difference is that coreutils separates the
hash from the file name by two blanks " " (or a blank followed by
an asterisk " *" with the -b option denoting).
While most scripts or users will not notice the difference, it might
be considered a violation of POLA and this commit reverts the change
for the non-sum programs. These will print a single blank " " as the
separator, as they die before the previous commit.
In order to still generate output that is identical to that of the
coreutils programs, this commit generates the " " or " *" separator
used by them for the -sum versions, depending on the presence of the
-b option.
MFC after: 3 days
The -c option expects a digest file in either BSD or coreutils format.
The output for matched and mismatched files is identical to that
of the coreutils version.
The review of these changes included test cases that have already
been committed for the functionality that existed before.
Another test script is added to cover the coreutils compatible
extension implemented by this patch.
This commit contains a tests/Makefile that has been cleaned up
compared to the review version, using an implicit rule to apply the
TESTBASE path at build time (and the scripts have been renamed to
have an extension of .SH instead of .sh to trigger this rule).
Reviewed by: imp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30812
stdbool.h needs to be included to use type bool variables. Due to
namespace pollution, this gets brought in on FreeBSD, but not on
other systems. Include it explicilty.
Noticed by: arichards@
Sponsored by: Netflix
On Linux, there's a similar set of programs to ours, but that end in the
letters 'sum'. These act basically like FreeBSD versions run with the -r
option. Add code so that when the program ends in 'sum' you get the
linux -r behavior. This is enough to make most things that use sha*sum
work correctly (the -c / --check options, as well as the long args are
not implemented). When running with the -sum programs, ignore -t instead
of running internal speed tests and make -c an error.
Reviewed by: sef, and kp and allanjude (earlier version)
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Netflix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30309
Previously, the -p and -c flags were ignored when reading from stdin
Additionally, -s and -c can be used together now.
PR: 247295
Reviewed by: kevans
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Klara Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25362
In order to build on a Linux host we need to bootstrap md5 since the Linux
md5sum command produces output in a different format.
Reviewed By: emaste
Approved By: brooks (mentor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16846
The double compilation of the kernel sources in libmd and libcrypt is
baffling, but add yet another define hack to prevent duplicate symbols.
Add documentation and SHA2-224 test cases to libmd.
Integrate with the md5(1) command, document, and add more test cases;
self-tests pass.
Connect it to userland (libmd, libcrypt, sbin/md5) and kernel (crypto.ko)
Support for skein as a ZFS checksum algorithm was introduced in r289422
but is disconnected because FreeBSD lacked a Skein implementation.
A further commit will enable it in ZFS.
Reviewed by: cem
Sponsored by: ScaleEngine Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6166
This implements SHA-512/256, which generates a 256 bit hash by
calculating the SHA-512 then truncating the result. A different initial
value is used, making the result different from the first 256 bits of
the SHA-512 of the same input. SHA-512 is ~50% faster than SHA-256 on
64bit platforms, so the result is a faster 256 bit hash.
The main goal of this implementation is to enable support for this
faster hashing algorithm in ZFS. The feature was introduced into ZFS
in r289422, but is disconnected because SHA-512/256 support was missing.
A further commit will enable it in ZFS.
This is the follow on to r292782
Reviewed by: cem
Sponsored by: ScaleEngine Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6061
cperciva's libmd implementation is 5-30% faster
The same was done for SHA256 previously in r263218
cperciva's implementation was lacking SHA-384 which I implemented, validated against OpenSSL and the NIST documentation
Extend sbin/md5 to create sha384(1)
Chase dependancies on sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.{c,h} and replace them with sha512{c.c,.h}
Reviewed by: cperciva, des, delphij
Approved by: secteam, bapt (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: ScaleEngine Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3929
* Don't buffer "Digesting..." output - flush it immediately.
* Increase the number of repetitions by a factor of 100, and the block size by
a factor of 10 so as to give meaningful results on modern machines (108
seconds on my P120, and ~26 seconds on a P-II 350).
PR: bin/10604
Submitted by: Stanislav Shalunov <shalunov@lynxhub.lz.att.com>
