When we was compering it to code from boot2 it also looks like
this code is buggy and boot2 was never updated to use this code.
USE_XREAD flag is unused in boot2, and common/drv.c was never
build with that flag.
Reviewed by: jhb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9780
being a bootstrap tool. However, for reproducible build output,
FreeBSD added dd status=none because it was otherwise difficult to
suppress the status information, but retain any errors that might
happen. There's no real reason that dd has to be a build tool, other
than we use status=none unconditional. Remove dd from a bootstrap tool
entirely by only using status=none when available. This may also help
efforts to build the system on non-FreeBSD hosts as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8605
not page aligned. To do this, use the ld script gnu ld installs on my
system.
This is imperfect: LDFLAGS_BIN and LD_FLAGS_BIN describe different
things. The loader script could be better named and take into account
other architectures. And having two different mechanisms to do
basically the same thing needs study. However, it's blocking forward
progress on lld, so I'll work in parallel to sort these out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7409
Reviewed by: emaste
Updated sha512 from illumos.
Using skein from freebsd crypto tree.
Since loader itself is using 64MB memory for heap, updated zfsboot to
use same, and this also allows to support zfs large blocks.
Note, adding additional features does increate zfsboot code, therefore
this update does increase zfsboot code to 128k, also I have ported gptldr.S
update to zfsldr.S to support 64k+ code.
With this update, boot1.efi has almost reached the current limit of the size
set for it, so one of the future patches for boot1.efi will need to
increase the limit.
Currently known missing zfs features in boot loader are edonr and gzip support.
Reviewed by: delphij, imp
Approved by: imp (mentor)
Obtained from: sha256.c update and skein_zfs.c stub from illumos.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7418
hate adding yet another define, but it is the lessor of the evil
choices available. Kill another evil by removing PATH_BOOT3 and
replacing it with PATH_LOADER or PATH_LOADER_ZFS as appropriate.
PR: 206659
This is not properly respecting WITHOUT or ARCH dependencies in target/.
Doing so requires a massive effort to rework targets/ to do so. A
better approach will be to either include the SUBDIR Makefiles directly
and map to DIRDEPS or just dynamically lookup the SUBDIR. These lose
the benefit of having a userland/lib, userland/libexec, etc, though and
results in a massive package. The current implementation of targets/ is
very unmaintainable.
Currently rescue/rescue and sys/modules are still not connected.
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
Tracking these leads to situations where meta mode will consider the
file to be out of date if /bin/sh or /bin/ln are newer than the source
file. There's no reason for meta mode to do this as make is already
handling the rebuild dependency fine.
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
- Add prototype for boot2 main()
- Don't make assignment within if statement, split it into two.
No functional or binary change -- verified with sha256(1).
MFC after: 2 weeks
Off by default, build behaves normally.
WITH_META_MODE we get auto objdir creation, the ability to
start build from anywhere in the tree.
Still need to add real targets under targets/ to build packages.
Differential Revision: D2796
Reviewed by: brooks imp
stage, just like for the regular world stage.
Reviewed by: rodrigc, imp, bapt, emaste
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2187
-mno-align-long-strings when compiling with base gcc. This is checked
by comparing the version number against 4.2.1, which is not exactly
right, but good enough. (There is no other way to check whether we are
using the non-standard gcc in base, as far as I know.)
Reported by: rodrigc
MFC after: 3 days
1. 50+% of NO_PIE use is fixed by adding -fPIC to INTERNALLIB and other
build-only utility libraries.
2. Another 40% is fixed by generating _pic.a variants of various libraries.
3. Some of the NO_PIE use is a bit absurd as it is disabling PIE (and ASLR)
where it never would work anyhow, such as csu or loader. This suggests
there may be better ways of adding support to the tree. Many of these
cases can be fixed such that -fPIE will work but there is really no
reason to have it in those cases.
4. Some of the uses are working around hacks done to some Makefiles that are
really building libraries but have been using bsd.prog.mk because the code
is cleaner. Had they been using bsd.lib.mk then NO_PIE would not have
been needed.
We likely do want to enable PIE by default (opt-out) for non-tree consumers
(such as ports). For in-tree though we probably want to only enable PIE
(opt-in) for common attack targets such as remote service daemons and setuid
utilities. This is also a great performance compromise since ASLR is expected
to reduce performance. As such it does not make sense to enable it in all
utilities such as ls(1) that have little benefit to having it enabled.
Reported by: kib
percentage of machines has a 16550. Disable it for pc98 since only a
tiny fraction of them have one. These changes save 293 bytes when
building with clang, but preserves the ability to build with serial if
you really want. We now have 92 bytes free (412 with the in-tree gcc).
This is currently an opt-in build flag. Once ASLR support is ready and stable
it should changed to opt-out and be enabled by default along with ASLR.
Each application Makefile uses opt-out to ensure that ASLR will be enabled by
default in new directories when the system is compiled with PIE/ASLR. [2]
Mark known build failures as NO_PIE for now.
The only known runtime failure was rtld.
[1] http://www.bsdcan.org/2014/schedule/events/452.en.html
Submitted by: Shawn Webb <lattera@gmail.com>
Discussed between: des@ and Shawn Webb [2]
thicket of .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == "clang" that controls
warnings. Also, use CFLAGS.clang in a couple places in preference to
having a similar construct that's related to the CWARNFLAGS changes.
directly to the linker (LD_FLAGS) from flags passed indirectly, via the
compiler driver (LDFLAGS).
This is because several Makefiles under sys/boot/i386 and sys/boot/pc98
use ${LD} directly to link, and the normal LDFLAGS value should not be
used in these cases.
MFC after: 3 days
sio.S. This is not particularly needed for head right now, but it is
intended to merge to stable/9, to fix boot2 build with clang there.
Reviewed by: avg
MFC after: 3 days
