in ti_rxeof() instead. This doesn't really seem to provide much in the
way of a performance boost, and I'm pretty sure it can cause mbuf leakage
in some extreme cases.
positively not let ti_encap() fill up the TX ring all the way and wrap
around. This fixes a potential transmit lockup where a really fast
machine (or particular TX traffic pattern) can overrun the end of the
ring.
Reported by: John Plevyak <jplevyak@inktomi.com>
preparation for tsunami support. Previous chipsets' direct-mapped DMA
mask was always 1024*1024*1024. The Tsunami chipset needs it to be
2*1024*1024*1024
These changes should not affect the i386 port
Reviewed by: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
in the transmit code: the TX descriptor ring, and a 'shadow' ring of mbuf
pointers, one for each TX descriptor. When transmitting a packet that
consists of several fragments in an mbuf chain, we link each fragment
to a descriptor in the TX ring, but we only save a pointer to the mbuf
chain. This pointer is saved in the shadow ring entry which corresponds
to the first fragment in the packet. Later, ti_txeof() can release the
whole chain with a single m_freem() call. (We need the second ring to
keep track of the virtual addresses of the mbuf chains.)
The problem with this is that the Tigon isn't actually through with the
mbuf chain until it reaches the last fragment (which has the TI_BDFLAG_END
bit set), however the current scheme releases the mbuf chain as soon as
the first fragment is consumed. This is wrong, since the mbufs can then
be yanked out from under the Tigon and modified before the other fragments
can be transmitted.
The fix is to make a one line change to ti_encap() so that it saves the
mbuf chain pointer in the shadow ring entry that corresponds to the last
fragment in TX ring instead of the first. This prevents the mbufs from
being released until the last fragment is transmitted.
Painstakingly diagnosed and fixed by: Robert Picco <picco@mail.wevinc.com>
Brought to my attention by: dg
#define COMPAT_PCI_DRIVER(name,data) DATA_SET(pcidevice_set,data)
.. to 2.2.x and 3.x if people think it's worth it. Driver writers can do
this if it's not defined. (The reason for this is that I'm trying to
progressively eliminate use of linker_sets where it hurts modularity and
runtime load capability, and these DATA_SET's keep getting in the way.)
bug in the stats accounting (nicSendBDs counter was bogus when TX ring was
configured to be in host memory).
Update if_tireg.h to look for new firmware fix level.
from ever catching up to the transmit consumer index. We can't let this
happen because ti_txeof() depends on the assumption that producer == consumer
means the ring is empty, and producer != consumer means the ring has some
number of active descriptors in it.
Oh, I forgot to mention: this driver also works on FreeBSD/alpha (big
thanks to Andrew Gallatin). And there is a 2.2.x version available for
those who stubbornly refuse to upgrade.
Networks Tigon 1 and Tigon 2 chipsets. There are a _lot_ of OEM'ed
gigabit ethernet adapters out there which use the Alteon chipset so
this driver covers a fair amount of hardware. I know that it works with
the Alteon AceNIC, 3Com 3c985 and Netgear GA620, however it should also
work with the DEC/Compaq EtherWORKS 1000, Silicon Graphics Gigabit
ethernet board, NEC Gigabit Ethernet board and maybe even the IBM and
and Sun boards. The Netgear board is the cheapest (~$350US) but still
yields fairly good performance.
Support is provided for jumbo frames with all adapters (just set the
MTU to something larger than 1500 bytes), as well as hardware multicast
filtering and vlan tagging (in conjunction with the vlan support in
-current, which I should merge into -stable soon). There are some hooks
for checksum offload support, but they're turned off for now since
FreeBSD doesn't have an officially sanctioned way to support checksum
offloading (yet).
I have not added the 'device ti0' entry to GENERIC since the driver
with all the firmware compiled in is quite large, and it doesn't really
fit into the category of generic hardware.
