via %s
Most of the cases looked harmless, but this is done for the sake of
correctness. In one case it even allowed to drop an intermediate buffer.
Found by: clang
MFC after: 2 week
ta_func may free the task structure, so no references to its members
are valid after the handler has been called. Using a per-queue member
and having waits longer than strictly necessary was suggested by jhb.
Submitted by: Matthew Fleming <matthew.fleming@isilon.com>
Reviewed by: zml, jhb
taskqueue_drain(9) will not correctly detect whether a task is
currently running. The check is against a field in the taskqueue
struct, but for a threaded queue with more than one thread, multiple
threads can simultaneously be running a task, thus stomping over the
tq_running field.
Submitted by: Matthew Fleming <matthew.fleming@isilon.com>
Reviewed by: jhb
Approved by: dfr (mentor)
td_name[] arrays are actually MAXCOMLEN + 1 in size and a few places that
created shadow copies of these arrays were just using MAXCOMLEN.
- Prefer using sizeof() of an array type to explicit constants for the
array length in a few places.
- Ensure that all of p_comm[] and td_name[] is always zero'd during
execve() to guard against any possible information leaks. Previously
trailing garbage in p_comm[] could be leaked to userland in ktrace
record headers via td_name[].
Reviewed by: bde
replace it with wrappers around our taskqueue(9).
To make it possible implement taskqueue_member() function which returns 1
if the given thread was created by the given taskqueue.
Approved by: re (kib)
the owner of a queue to block and unblock execution of the tasks in the
queue while allowing tasks to continue to be added queue. Combining this
with taskqueue_drain() allows a queue to be safely disabled. The unblock
function may run (or schedule to run) the queue when it is called, just as
calling taskqueue_enqueue() would.
Reviewed by: jhb, sam
to kproc_xxx as they actually make whole processes.
Thos makes way for us to add REAL kthread_create() and friends
that actually make theads. it turns out that most of these
calls actually end up being moved back to the thread version
when it's added. but we need to make this cosmetic change first.
I'd LOVE to do this rename in 7.0 so that we can eventually MFC the
new kthread_xxx() calls.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
setrunqueue() was mostly empty. The few asserts and thread state
setting were moved to the individual schedulers. sched_add() was
chosen to displace it for naming consistency reasons.
- Remove adjustrunqueue, it was 4 lines of code that was ifdef'd to be
different on all three schedulers where it was only called in one place
each.
- Remove the long ifdef'd out remrunqueue code.
- Remove the now redundant ts_state. Inspect the thread state directly.
- Don't set TSF_* flags from kern_switch.c, we were only doing this to
support a feature in one scheduler.
- Change sched_choose() to return a thread rather than a td_sched. Also,
rely on the schedulers to return the idlethread. This simplifies the
logic in choosethread(). Aside from the run queue links kern_switch.c
mostly does not care about the contents of td_sched.
Discussed with: julian
- Move the idle thread loop into the per scheduler area. ULE wants to
do something different from the other schedulers.
Suggested by: jhb
Tested on: x86/amd64 sched_{4BSD, ULE, CORE}.
stopped before adjusting their priority and setting them on the run
q so they cannot race for resources (pointed out by njl).
While here add a console printf on thread create fails; otherwise
noone may notice (e.g. return value is always 0 and caller has no
way to verify).
Reviewed by: jhb, scottl
MFC after: 2 weeks
if the specified priority is zero. This avoids a race where the calling
thread could read a snapshot of it's current priority, then a different
thread could change the first thread's priority, then the original thread
would call sched_prio() inside msleep() undoing the change made by the
second thread. I used a priority of zero as no thread that calls msleep()
or tsleep() should be specifying a priority of zero anyway.
The various places that passed 'curthread->td_priority' or some variant
as the priority now pass 0.
failing, print a message when we fail for some reason as most callers do
not check the return value (e.g. 'cuz they're called from SYSINIT)
Reviewed by: scottl
MFC after: 1 week
taskqueue_start_threads(struct taskqueue **, int count, int pri,
const char *name, ...);
This allows the creation of 1 or more threads that will service a single
taskqueue. Also rework the taskqueue_create() API to remove the API change
that was introduced a while back. Creating a taskqueue doesn't rely on
the presence of a process structure, and the proc mechanics are much better
encapsulated in taskqueue_start_threads(). Also clean up the
taskqueue_terminate() and taskqueue_free() functions to safely drain
pending tasks and remove all associated threads.
The TASKQUEUE_DEFINE and TASKQUEUE_DEFINE_THREAD macros have been changed
to use the new API, but drivers compiled against the old definitions will
still work. Thus, recompiling drivers is not a strict requirement.
fast taskqueues. The following have been added:
TASKQUEUE_FAST_DEFINE() - create a global task queue.
an arbitrary execution context.
TASKQUEUE_FAST_DEFINE_THREAD() - create a global taskqueue that uses a
dedicated kthread.
taskqueue_create_fast() - create a local/private taskqueue.
These are all complimentary of the standard taskqueue functions. They are
primarily useful for fast interrupt handlers that can only use spinlock for
synchronization.
I personally think that the taskqueue API is starting to get too narrow and
hairy, but fixing it will require a major redesign on the API. Such a
redesign would be good but would break compatibility with FreeBSD 6.x, so
it really isn't desirable at this time.
Submitted by: sam
a new entry in the taskqueue struct each time it wakes up to see if it
should terminate
o adjust TASKQUEUE_DEFINE_THREAD & co. to record the thread/proc identity for
the shutdown rendezvous
o replace wakeup after adding a task to a queue with wakeup_one; this helps
queues where multiple threads are used to service tasks (e.g. acpi)
o remove NULL check of tq_enqueue method; it should never be NULL
Reviewed by: dfr, njl
modify-after-free races when the task structure is malloc'd
o shrink task structure by removing ta_flags (no longer needed with
avoid fix) and combining ta_pending and ta_priority
Reviewed by: dwhite, dfr
MFC after: 4 days
the queue has been removed from the global taskqueue_queues list. This
removes the need for the draining queue hack.
- Allow taskqueue_run() to be called with the taskqueue mutex held. It
can still be called without the lock for API compatiblity. In that case
it will acquire the lock internally.
- Don't lock the individual queue mutex in taskqueue_find() until after the
strcmp as the global queues mutex is sufficient for the strcmp.
- Simplify taskqueue_thread_loop() now that it can hold the lock across
taskqueue_run().
Submitted by: bde (mostly)
Instead of creating a mutex that we msleep on but don't actually lock when
doing the corresponding wakeup(), in the kthread, lock the mutex associated
with our taskqueue and msleep while the queue is empty. Assert that the
queue is locked when the callback function is called to wake the kthread.
because RFNOWAIT was being passed to kproc_create.
The result was that shutdown took quite a bit longer because this
errant "child" would not respond to termination signals from init
at system shutdown.
RFNOWAIT dissassociates itself from the caller by attaching to init
as a parent proc. We could have had the taskqueue proc listen for
SIGKILL, but being able to SIGKILL a potentially critical system
process doesn't seem like a good idea.
out of cdregister() and daregister(), which are run from interrupt context.
The sysctl code does blocking mallocs (M_WAITOK), which causes problems
if malloc(9) actually needs to sleep.
The eventual fix for this issue will involve moving the CAM probe process
inside a kernel thread. For now, though, I have fixed the issue by moving
dynamic sysctl variable creation for these two drivers to a task queue
running in a kernel thread.
The existing task queues (taskqueue_swi and taskqueue_swi_giant) run in
software interrupt handlers, which wouldn't fix the problem at hand. So I
have created a new task queue, taskqueue_thread, that runs inside a kernel
thread. (It also runs outside of Giant -- clients must explicitly acquire
and release Giant in their taskqueue functions.)
scsi_cd.c: Remove sysctl variable creation code from cdregister(), and
move it to a new function, cdsysctlinit(). Queue
cdsysctlinit() to the taskqueue_thread taskqueue once we
have fully registered the cd(4) driver instance.
scsi_da.c: Remove sysctl variable creation code from daregister(), and
move it to move it to a new function, dasysctlinit().
Queue dasysctlinit() to the taskqueue_thread taskqueue once
we have fully registered the da(4) instance.
taskqueue.h: Declare the new taskqueue_thread taskqueue, update some
comments.
subr_taskqueue.c:
Create the new kernel thread taskqueue. This taskqueue
runs outside of Giant, so any functions queued to it would
need to explicitly acquire/release Giant if they need it.
cd.4: Update the cd(4) man page to talk about the minimum command
size sysctl/loader tunable. Also note that the changer
variables are available as loader tunables as well.
da.4: Update the da(4) man page to cover the retry_count,
default_timeout and minimum_cmd_size sysctl variables/loader
tunables. Remove references to /dev/r???, they aren't used
any longer.
cd.9: Update the cd(9) man page to describe the CD_Q_10_BYTE_ONLY
quirk.
taskqueue.9: Update the taskqueue(9) man page to describe the new thread
task queue, and the taskqueue_swi_giant queue.
MFC after: 3 days
turns runs its tasks free of Giant too. It is intended that as drivers
become locked down, they will move out of the old, Giant-bound taskqueue
and into this new one. The old taskqueue has been renamed to
taskqueue_swi_giant, and the new one keeps the name taskqueue_swi.
other references to that vnode as a trace vnode in other processes as well
as in any pending requests on the todo list. Thus, it is possible for a
ktrace request structure to have a NULL ktr_vp when it is destroyed in
ktr_freerequest(). We shouldn't call vrele() on the vnode in that case.
Reported by: bde
most cases NULL is passed, but in some cases such as network driver locks
(which use the MTX_NETWORK_LOCK macro) and UMA zone locks, a name is used.
Tested on: i386, alpha, sparc64
mutex releases to not require flags for the cases when preemption is
not allowed:
The purpose of the MTX_NOSWITCH and SWI_NOSWITCH flags is to prevent
switching to a higher priority thread on mutex releease and swi schedule,
respectively when that switch is not safe. Now that the critical section
API maintains a per-thread nesting count, the kernel can easily check
whether or not it should switch without relying on flags from the
programmer. This fixes a few bugs in that all current callers of
swi_sched() used SWI_NOSWITCH, when in fact, only the ones called from
fast interrupt handlers and the swi_sched of softclock needed this flag.
Note that to ensure that swi_sched()'s in clock and fast interrupt
handlers do not switch, these handlers have to be explicitly wrapped
in critical_enter/exit pairs. Presently, just wrapping the handlers is
sufficient, but in the future with the fully preemptive kernel, the
interrupt must be EOI'd before critical_exit() is called. (critical_exit()
can switch due to a deferred preemption in a fully preemptive kernel.)
I've tested the changes to the interrupt code on i386 and alpha. I have
not tested ia64, but the interrupt code is almost identical to the alpha
code, so I expect it will work fine. PowerPC and ARM do not yet have
interrupt code in the tree so they shouldn't be broken. Sparc64 is
broken, but that's been ok'd by jake and tmm who will be fixing the
interrupt code for sparc64 shortly.
Reviewed by: peter
Tested on: i386, alpha
while it is on a queue with the queue lock and remove the per-task locks.
- Remove TASK_DESTROY now that it is no longer needed.
- Go back to inlining TASK_INIT now that it is short again.
Inspired by: dfr
queue, and a mutex to protect the global list of taskqueues. The only
visible change is that a TASK_DESTROY() macro has been added to mirror
the TASK_INIT() macro to destroy a task before it is free'd.
Submitted by: Andrew Reiter <awr@watson.org>
- Use swi_* function names.
- Use void * to hold cookies to handlers instead of struct intrhand *.
- In sio.c, use 'driver_name' instead of "sio" as the name of the driver
lock to minimize diffs with cy(4).
