6 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Poul-Henning Kamp	b80d982b84	As pointed out by Paul Traina, we need the libs to be 261.0 not 26.1.	1994-11-07 04:40:26 +00:00
David Greenman	b2075ecc44	Changed NO_SHARED_LIBCC_INT to SHARED_LIBCC_INT and changed the logic ... as appropriate. This makes gcc not built with a shared cc_int the default.	1994-10-25 07:02:23 +00:00
Bruce Evans	00f21b4680	Don't build profiled library.	1994-09-20 22:03:09 +00:00
Garrett Wollman	0385520e72	For Bruce: -DNO_SHARED_LIBCC_INT reverts back to static libcc_int. ... This makes the back end run faster, but at the cost of speed.	1994-09-19 21:37:50 +00:00
Garrett Wollman	b4aca961be	Make GCC's back end be shared among all languages. cc, c++, and cpp now ... no longer link against the whole library, since they don't require much from it, but just compile the few small modules they actually need static. This should save a measurable amount of space; compare: -r-xr-xr-x 1 bin bin 155648 Sep 18 18:00 cc1* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1048576 Sep 18 17:33 cc1.noshae* Of course, the library takes up a bit of space, but when you add in the savings from the C++ compiler, you more than make up the difference: -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 1157344 Sep 18 18:27 /usr/lib/libcc_int.so.26.0 -r-xr-xr-x 1 bin bin 491520 Sep 18 18:27 /usr/libexec/cc1plus*	1994-09-18 22:35:55 +00:00
Poul-Henning Kamp	b75deec600	Here comes the right import of gcc-2.6.0.	1994-08-02 20:15:59 +00:00