ftp tools aren't that useful nowadays but some might want them.
Create a FreeBSD-ftp package so users have a choice to have
them or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31794
vt files for either keyboards and fonts are totally optional
so create a separate package for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31797
mlx* are only useful for users who have a Mellanox card.
Create a package for it so users that don't have this card can
avoid having this program.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31795
cxgbetool is only useful for users who have a Chelsio card.
Create a package for it so users that don't have this card can
avoid having this program.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31793
both telnet and telnetd aren't that useful nowadays but some
might want them.
Create a FreeBSD-telnet package so users have a choice to have
them or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31791
Reviewed by: emaste
And move all the nfs related commands there.
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30754
Sponsored by: Diablotin Systems
This is useful for upgrade and also to make tiny jail so they won't
depend on FreeBSD-utilities (where openssl was packaged before).
MFC after: 1 month
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30081
The mangling was present in the initial revision of the script, but its
purpose is not clear. It may have been to avoid defining make(1)
variables with a dash in the name, but this is permitted. Furthermore,
it results in invalid dependency information if a dependency's name
contains an underscore, causing e.g., libcompiler_rt-dev to depend on
libcompiler-rt, and resulting in warnings when installing base system
packages. Remove the mangling.
Reviewed by: manu
MFC after: 2 months
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29883
make "vital" a replaceable, which defaults to "false" and only set it for
the main clib, utilities and runtime packages, not their sub-packages
PR: 254174
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29224
Man pages can be big in total, add an options to split man pages
in -man packages so we produce smaller packages.
This is useful for small jails or mfsroot produced of pkgbase.
The option is off by default.
Reviewed by: bapt, Mina Galić <me@igalic.co>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29169
MFC after: 2 weeks
They aren't needed and produce wrong package comments :
We use to have "runtime-dev package" instead of
"FreeBSD Base System (Development Files)" for example
Reviewed by: bapt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29168
MFC after: 2 weeks
Everywhere else we use objects ("scripts", generally) we do sepcify the
optional colon. Be consistent and do the same for directories.
PR: 249273
Submitted by: Martin <martin.jakob gmx com>
MFC after: 1 week
-development is long and awkward, and is also inconsistent with prior art
from the Linux world, which uses -dev (Debian) or -devel (Red Hat). Follow
the Debian convention, and similarly for debug info packages.
Also remove redundant pkgbase development tag from includes. We already tag
include files with package=runtime,dev; there is no need to separately tag
them as dev.
Discussed with: bapt
Reviewed by: manu
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24139
We don't produce these anymore as of r356797, remove the remnant in
generate-ucl.sh that accounted for them. This isn't strictly necessary, but
future work is needed for the various packages that can be generated on a
lib build.
Namely, we may produce -development packages for private/internal libs that
should be installed but won't have the base FreeBSD-libfoo pkg to depend on
because it's internal (e.g. liby, libpmcstat, libifconfig) but we want the
headers installed. It may be a better move to just shove these into
-runtime-development instead, but if not then we've just simplified the
cases that need to take private/internal libs into account.
This cuts out a large chunk of duplicated *.ucl files that just needed
dependencies tacked on, and gives generate-ucl.sh some leeway in case a
future pkg may need more than one dependency.
Run-through to determine which ones could simply be removed done with for i
in *.ucl; do diff -U3 template.ucl ${i}; done | less and inspecting for any
differences beyond just adding deps at the end. The remaining ucl files are
basically all differently-licensed, require scripts, or are marked vital.
I've opted to remove %PKGDEPS% entirely without regard for third-party ucl,
as pkgbase is not yet considered production. However, I do not hold a strong
position on this and there is approximately 0 chance it will return.
clibs should have been added previously in generate-ucl.sh as one that
doesn't have any dependencies, but do so now that we would otherwise be
tacking on the runtime dependency.
Reviewed by: manu, bapt (earlier version)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23415
The original intention for caroot was to be packaged separately, perhaps so
that users can have a more/less conservative upgrade policy for this
separated from the rest of base.
secure/caroot/Makefile doesn't have anything interesting to package, but its
subdirectories might. Move the PACKAGE= to Makefile.inc so both blacklisted
and trusted get packaged consistently into the correct one rather than the
default -utilities. Also tag the directories for package=caroot, as they
could also be empty; blacklisted is empty by default, but trusted is not.
Add a post-install script to do certctl rehash, along with a note should we
eventually come up with a way to detect that files have been added or
removed that requires a rehash.
-caroot gets a dependency on -utilities, as that's where we provide certctl
at the moment. We can perhaps reconsider this and put certctl into this
package in the future, but there are some bits within -utilities that
unconditionally invoke certctl so let's hold off for now.
Reviewed by: manu (earlier version, before -utilities dep added)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23352
These are just direct copies of the template. If they don't exist but are
attempted to be used, generate-ucl.sh will simply fallback to the template
anyways. Let it do so to reduce potential maintenance burden.
Since login and login.conf moved to the utilities packages move also
the post-install related commands.
Reported by: mj-mailinglist@gmx.de
Reviewed by: bapt
The default package use to be FreeBSD-runtime but it should only contain
binaries and libs enough to boot to single user and repair the system, it
is also very handy to have a package that can be tranform to a small mfsroot.
So create a new package named FreeBSD-utilities and make it the default one.
Also move a few binaries and lib into this package when it make sense.
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21506
It doesn't need to be in runtime and might help people who want to
experiment with other rc system or don't use one (like in small
embedded mfsroot).
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21499
Bootloader file isn't needed for jails so don't include it in FreeBSD-runtime.
Reviewed by: bapt, delphij, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21496
Move the bluetooth related files from FreeBSD-runtime to a new package named
FreeBSD-bluetooth
The FreeBSD runtime is only intended to have everything for a working
FreeBSD installation and bluetooth isn't needed for that.
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20959
Move the hostapd related files from FreeBSD-runtime to a new package n
FreeBSD-hostapd
The FreeBSD runtime is only intended to have everything for a working
FreeBSD installation and hostapd isn't needed for that.
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20958
Move the wpa related files from FreeBSD-runtime to a new package named
FreeBSD-wpa
The FreeBSD runtime is only intended to have everything for a working
FreeBSD installation and wpa isn't needed for that.
Reviewed by: bapt, gjb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20957
kernel.ucl uses a hardcoded boot/kernel for kldxref, which is the incorrect
directory when we're installing extra kernels that aren't the "default"
kernel (placed at boot/kernel).
Fix this by instead using a new %KERNELDIR% that we now replace in
Makefile.inc1 with "kernel" for the default kernel and "kernel.${_kernel}"
for these extra kernels so that, e.g. /boot/kernel.SHIVA, will get properly
kldxref'd upon update and avoid outdated linker.hints.
Reviewed by: gjb
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14689
Disconnect the dependency on the kernel package from the runtime
package. There are a number of problems here:
1) The runtime package installed into a chroot or a jail would
include the kernel package, changing the behavior of how jails
work now [1];
2) As result of (1), it is possible a binary may incorrectly
resolve kernel symbols [2]; in addition, it is possible there
will be unexpected fallout with 32-bit jails on a 64-bit host
kernel [2].
Noticed by: brd [1]
Discussed with: kib [2]
MFC after: 3 days
MFC note: record-only to wipe from the merge tracker
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
svnversion metadata to the runtime and kernel packages.
Instead of traversing src/sys, as is done by newvers.sh for uname(1),
a full tree walk is done to prevent userland and/or modifications
from not being reflected in a modified tree (M).
MFC after: 5 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Use PPID and PID to kill off the pre-install and parent pkg(8)
processes unless 'Y' or 'y' are entered at the prompt if the user
wants to proceed with upgrading the kernel and userland at the same
time.
This restores some of the logic and intent of r322327, with the
caveat of printing "child process terminated unexpectedly."
MFC after: 5 days
MFC with: r322327, r322352
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
It appears I misunderstand process forking and signal handling in
how the pre-/post-install scripts are executed internally by pkg(8).
In some cases (not all), ^C when prompted to cancel the kernel
package update will stop the pre-install script from executing, but
allow pkg(8) to continue extracting the package when it is not the
intent.
In order to keep somewhat of an anti-footshooting measure in place,
print the recommendation to install the kernel package first if
ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES is false and TERM is set, then sleep for 5 seconds
to allow the user to see the message.
MFC after: 5 days
MFC with: r322327
X-MFC-Note: Maybe not until I am happy with this..
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
The idea here is that, provided upstream pkg(8) maintainers accept
the proposed change, the kernel.ucl will contain a post-install
script causing pkg(8) to emit a message informing to reboot the
system after the kernel is upgraded using 'pkg upgrade', so the
new userland is installed on the running new kernel. At present,
this functionality does not exist in pkg(8), but will help ensure
the upgrade path follows that from UPDATING. To work around this
for now, evaluate ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES, and prompt the user if they
wish to proceed if not set to true.
Since there is a kernel dependency, and a non-GENERIC kernel may
be in use, update Makefile.inc1 to replace '%KERNCONF%' in the
runtime.ucl with the first-built kernel set either via command line
or in make.conf(5).
MFC after: 5 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
During the upgrade of clang/llvm etc to 3.9.0 in r309124, the PACKAGE
directive in the usr.bin/clang/*.mk files got dropped accidentally.
Restore it, with a few minor changes and additions:
* Correct license in clang.ucl to NCSA
* Add PACKAGE=clang for clang and most of the "ll" tools
* Put lldb in its own package
* Put lld in its own package
Reviewed by: gjb, jmallett
X-MFC-With: 309124
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8666
