copied as a template for _SRS, a string pointer for descriptor name is also
copied and it becomes stale as soon as it gets de-allocated[2]. Now _CRS is
used as a template for _SRS as ACPI specification suggests if it is usable.
The template from _PRS is still utilized but only when _CRS is not available
or broken. To avoid use-after-free the problem in this case, however, only
mandatory fields are copied, optional data is removed, and structure length
is adjusted accordingly.
Reported by: hps[1]
Analyzed by: avg[2]
Tested by: hps
reason (not all BIOSen have _DIS methods for all link devices for example).
This matches the behavior of attach() with respect to _DIS as well.
Submitted by: njl
that aren't listed as valid in the link device's set of possible IRQs.
This allows the hints to be used to work around broken BIOSes that don't
specify the correct ste of possible IRQs. A warning is issued in the
dmesg in this case to be consistent with the $PIR handling code.
MFC after: 1 week
doesn't have any actual interrupts is listed in a _PRT entry, only print
a warning rather than panic'ing when we walk the _PRT's to build up count
of entries that reference a given link (the counts are used as weights so
that we can attempt to balance the load across IRQs used by link devices).
Instead, only panic if we attempt to use the _PRT entry to route an
interrupt for a device.
PR: i386/89545
Tested by: anders
immediately from acpi_pci_link_route_interrupt() since we aren't going
to have a valid pci_link device to talk to try to route interrupts. This
fixes a page fault if you disable just pci_link. Note that trying to use
ACPI without pci_link is probably not advised however.
MFC after: 1 week
Tested by: Eugene Grosbein eugen at kuzbass dot ru
- Improve panic message if we fail to read the PCI bus number from a bridge
device.
- Don't try to lookup a BIOS IRQ for a link unless the link is routed via
an ISA IRQ since BIOSen currently only route PCI link devices via ISA
IRQs.
Tested by: Mathieu Prevot bsdhack at club-internet dot fr
MFC after: 1 week
the IRQ set by the BIOS in existing devices to actually get the correct
bus number of the child PCI bus. I was not reading the bus number from
the bridge device correctly. The __BUS_ACCESSOR() macros (from which
pcib_get_bus() is built) assume that the passed in argument is a child
device. However, at the time I'm reading the bus there is no child
device yet, so I was passing in the pcib device as the child device.
The parent of the pcib device probably returned an error in the case of
a host bridge, thus resulting in random stack garbage for the bus number.
For PCI-PCI bridges, the bus number being used was actually the subvendor
of the PCI-PCI bridge device itself.
MFC after: 1 week
- Prefer '_' to ' ', as it results in more easily parsed results in
memory monitoring tools such as vmstat.
- Remove punctuation that is incompatible with using memory type names
as file names, such as '/' characters.
- Disambiguate some collisions by adding subsystem prefixes to some
memory types.
- Generally prefer lower case to upper case.
- If the same type is defined in multiple architecture directories,
attempt to use the same name in additional cases.
Not all instances were caught in this change, so more work is required to
finish this conversion. Similar changes are required for UMA zone names.
For such devices, we require _PRS to exist and we warn if any of the
resources in _PRS are not IRQ resources (since we'll have no way of knowing
which of those resources to use without a working _CRS). When it does
come time to set resources, we build up a resource buffer from scratch
as we do for devices with _CRS that only have IRQ resources.
- Fix a bug with setting extended IRQ resources where we set the IRQ value
in the wrong resource structure meaning that whichever IRQ was listed in
_PRS was used instead. This might fix some weird issues on certain boxes
where IRQs > 16 don't seem to work when using ACPI.
- Fix a bug with how we walked the resource buffer after _SRS to call
config_intr() in that the 'end' variable was not properly updated, so we
could either terminate the loop early or loop after the end of the
buffer.
Tested by: pjd
multiple IRQs (which is nonsense for _CRS) when the link hasn't been
programmed. Before, this was a KASSERT. A ServerWorks system was
seen returning IRQs of 0, 2 in response to _CRS before link setup.
Thanks to sam@ for quick testing and turnaround on this.
Tested by: sam
in the _PRS or _CRS of link devices. If faced with multiple DPFs in a
_PRS, we just use the first one. We assume that if _CRS has DPF tags they
only contain a single set since multiple DPFs wouldn't make any sense. In
practice, the only DPFs I've seen so far for link devices are that the one
IRQ resource is surrounded by a DPF tag pair for no apparent reason, and
this should handle that case fine now.
- Only allocate link structures for IRQ resources for link devices rather
than allocating a link structure for every resource.
Reviewed by: njl
Tested by: phk
@sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c:153" panic by backing out rev 1.37 in the SMP
case. It appears that on a dual-proc machine the assertions in the rev 1.37
commit log hold true.
resource lists. It used to be sized based only on _CRS, hence _PRS could
perform an out-of-bounds access if it was larger (i.e., when there are
dependent functions). Add asserts to detect this case. Note, this is
only a temporary fix and I believe _PRS and _CRS should have separate
arrays.
Also, fix a typo where the wrong irq was being check for the APIC case.
Submitted by: tegge
- Use a new-bus device driver for the ACPI PCI link devices. The devices
are called pci_linkX. The driver includes suspend/resume support so that
the ACPI bridge drivers no longer have to poke the links to get them
to handle suspend/resume. Also, the code to handle which IRQs a link is
routed to and choosing an IRQ when a link is not already routed is all
contained in the link driver. The PCI bridge drivers now ask the link
driver which IRQ to use once they determine that a _PRT entry does not
use a hardwired interrupt number.
- The new link driver includes support for multiple IRQ resources per
link device as well as preserving any non-IRQ resources when adjusting
the IRQ that a link is routed to.
- The entire approach to routing when using a link device is now
link-centric rather than pci bus/device/pin specific. Thus, when
using a tunable to override the default IRQ settings, one now uses
a single tunable to route an entire link rather than routing a single
device that uses the link (which has great foot-shooting potential if
the user tries to route the same link to two different IRQs using two
different pci bus/device/pin hints). For example, to adjust the IRQ
that \_SB_.LNKA uses, one would set 'hw.pci.link.LNKA.irq=10' from the
loader.
- As a side effect of having the link driver, unused link devices will now
be disabled when they are probed.
- The algorithm for choosing an IRQ for a link that doesn't already have an
IRQ assigned is now much closer to the one used in $PIR routing. When a
link is routed via an ISA IRQ, only known-good IRQs that the BIOS has
already used are used for routing instead of using probabilities to
guess at which IRQs are probably not used by an ISA device. One change
from $PIR is that the SCI is always considered a viable ISA IRQ, so that
if the BIOS does not setup any IRQs the kernel will degenerate to routing
all interrupts over the SCI. For non ISA IRQs, interrupts are picked
from the possible pool using a simplistic weighting algorithm.
Tested by: ru, scottl, others on acpi@
Reviewed by: njl
should only affect current resources, it seems best to wait until all
configuration is done before disabling it. If this fixes any problems, it
is a MT5 candidate.
* Serialize access to acpi_pci_link_config(), acpi_pci_find_prt(),
acpi_pci_link_route(), and acpi_pci_link_resume().
* Add lock assertions to all functions called by them.
there is no irq link. Since we now use the stored copy of PRT, not the
one that used to be passed into acpi_pcib_route_interrupt(), we need it in
the list. [1]
Fix a bug in acpi_pci_find_prt() where we weren't checking the bus, thus
choosing the wrong PRT entry to use for routing the link. Also, add a
printf for the case where the PRT entry is not found as this should not
happen.
Tested by: marcel [1]
incomplete in that the PRT routing was not aware of link programming.
Fix this by doing all routing through the link devices. The new algorithm
for setting up links is:
1. Read _CRS to get current setting. If invalid (not in _PRS), then set
to 0.
2. Attempt to call _DIS on the link. If successful, mark the link as not
routed. Otherwise, assume it still is.
Then when a routing request occurs:
3. Update weights for all IRQs
4. Attempt to route the initial IRQ if valid
5. If that fails, walk through the sorted list, attempting to route IRQs.
6. Configure the trigger/polarity based on _PRS.
Other changes:
* Add acpi_pci_find_prt() to look up the PRT entry for a given device and
acpi_pci_link_route() to select/route the best IRQ for it.
* Remove duplicated code in acpi_pcib_route_interrupt() that picked the
first IRQ from _PRS.
* Remove unneeded arguments from acpi_pcib_resume() and friends.
* Ignore _STA on link devices but report if it seems strange.
* Add a prt_source handle to the PRT structure since the ACPI struct
ACPI_PCI_ROUTING_TABLE uses a fixed-size entry for it. We'll need to
dynamically size this object if we want to use it the same way ACPI-CA
does. Null-terminate the source.
Tested by: Luo Hong <luohong99_at_mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
Jeffrey Katcher <jmkatcher_at_yahoo.com>
Info from: jhb, Len Brown (Intel)
message if they are incorrect. Also, remove the hack of allowing the
initial irq setting to not be in _PRS. As before, the old behavior can be
regained by defining ACPI_OLD_PCI_LINK.
following behavior:
* Link devices return invalid status (_STA) values. The results are very
unreliable -- sometimes never present. Just ignore the status and pick
the best configuration from _PRS.
* Link devices return invalid current settings (_CRS). Even after setting
the link value, many systems still return a different setting for _CRS.
When setting an IRQ, don't bother to check _CRS to see if we succeeded.
Note that we still check _CRS before routing and this should be addressed
as well.
Since this is a sensitive area, leave the old behavior accessible via
uncommenting the define for ACPI_OLD_PCI_LINK at the top of the file. Once
this has been thoroughly tested, this option and the code it covers will
be removed.
Thanks to Len Brown at Intel for informing us of these issues as he worked
around them in Linux.
correct. Instead, check it against the possible settings (_PRS) when
the link is probed. This is important when using APIC mode but link
devices still have PIC mode settings. This is also what Linux does.
Additional prodding by: Len Brown len dot brown at intel dot com
